HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    One World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3461  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2008, 4:10 PM
Puzzlecraft's Avatar
Puzzlecraft Puzzlecraft is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 265
Freedom Tower Core Jump - August 25, 2008

The eastern side of the south core's form structure jumped another level yesterday. Looks like it is now above street level, quite a milestone if true! Local photos would be greatly appreciated.

Here is an annimated gif I put together of yesterday's jump from the earthcam at 15 minute intervals:

     
     
  #3462  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2008, 4:15 PM
Ghost's Avatar
Ghost Ghost is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 251
Hasn't it been above ground level for a while now? I'm just wondering what's taking so long with the north core?
     
     
  #3463  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2008, 4:33 PM
Puzzlecraft's Avatar
Puzzlecraft Puzzlecraft is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 265
The steel has been above ground for some time but I think the core (concrete, etc.) was just below street level.

Within the past hour the western half of the south core also jumped up, matching the eastern half.
     
     
  #3464  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2008, 5:12 PM
NYC4Life's Avatar
NYC4Life NYC4Life is offline
The Time To Build Is Now
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 3,004
Progress! Progress! Progress!
__________________
"I want to wake up in the city that never sleeps"
     
     
  #3465  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2008, 4:14 AM
NYC4Life's Avatar
NYC4Life NYC4Life is offline
The Time To Build Is Now
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 3,004
The Wall Street Journal

New York's 9/11 Site Needed Not a Moses but a Logue

By ADA LOUISE HUXTABLE
August 27, 2008; Page D7

As we approach the seventh anniversary of 9/11, it is clear that the rebuilding of Ground Zero has failed. A recent editorial column in this newspaper by Daniel Henninger made the sad and insightful observation that even the coming together inspired by that awful event came apart as the process itself unraveled. He called the rebuilding arguably the greatest political and bureaucratic fiasco in the history of the world.



Interactive Graphic Here

I would carry that indictment further. I would say that this has probably been the greatest planning fiasco in the history of the world. Daniel Libeskind's prize-winning design, a flexible, schematic concept that established a framework of achievable, creative possibilities, has been progressively purged by political pandering and economic pragmatism. The Port Authority's own brutally detailed report earlier this year gave some cogent reasons why a strong, unified vision of civic and urban renewal on a plane worthy of a great city could not survive. These ranged from jurisdictional conflicts of the multiple agencies involved to the project's sheer logistical complexity.

Sustaining a vision while dealing with practical problems and realities requires an experienced professional to keep things on course. It takes someone with planning smarts, political savvy, and extraordinary negotiating skills, fueled by a dedicated belief in a clear objective. This kind of leadership was always the critical missing factor at Ground Zero. The businessmen and politicians appointed to the Lower Manhattan Development Corp. to guide the process lacked that expertise or resolve; they were unable or unwilling to differentiate between economically motivated development and long-term urban goals. They either undervalued the importance of those goals or were unable to hold them under pressure. Nor was there any way they could control the 19 different government entities that the Port Authority report identified as independent agencies taking uncoordinated, counterproductive actions. Both vision and plan were sabotaged by the LMDC's politically correct decisions and convenient compromises.

The conflicting constituencies of state and city governments and the independent Port Authority led to stalemate and something Mr. Henninger calls system malfunction. He noted that this increasingly common condition where nothing works and nothing is resolved has turned America's legendary "can do" into "can't-possibly-do," reinforced by political and bureaucratic inaction. Just think of all the bad roads, crumbling infrastructure, unrealized potential and ludicrous illogic of what used to be patronizingly called a Third World country. Try navigating the tortuous bureaucracies of any government program or riding a taxi in New York.



But he also noted something even more insidious: justification of a failing system by creeping euphemism. When did all of these infighting factions become benign "stakeholders," with equal rights, right or wrong? And when did those stakeholders cease to be recognized as special interests, each with its own self-directed agenda? The objective professionalism needed to balance all those agendas in the interest of a more overriding concept in the greater public interest has succumbed to the myth of an "inclusionary" process that goes beyond appropriate consideration of all relevant factors to the ridiculous denial of priorities. In one of those extreme pendulum swings that turns reason into nonsense, a reversal of the old, discredited urban renewal policies that ignored community input has become an abdication of all responsibility for a kind of goofy planning populism. This is affecting everything from the way we build to the buildings we preserve. At Ground Zero, it functioned particularly well as a device for the political evasion of difficult issues, like whether the heart of Lower Manhattan should be a dead or living place, dedicated to a dreadful past or a meaningful future. What we got was an enormously overscaled memorial that overwhelms the site, surrounded by the architectural tokenism of equally enormous, name-brand, commercial buildings. All 10 million square feet of commercial space lost with the twin towers will be replaced, which is ultimately all that matters to those who control the area. What disappeared were any dreams of real physical or spiritual renewal.

What went wrong, in the broadest sense, is that everything meant to turn the area into a symbol of rebirth and regeneration was subverted by political weakness or opportunism and New York's bottom-line, top-dollar mentality; what we have at Ground Zero is an awful marriage of deals and death. What was supposed to be a planning process was actually a huge planning black hole.

Everything that would have enriched and enlivened the area is gone -- the visual and performing arts groups and institutions originally planned and chosen, a variety of public spaces to serve and ameliorate the heavy commercial uses, even the initial focus on the drama of the surviving slurry wall that saved Lower Manhattan from the river. Some features were the casualties of unforeseen complications; others were just let go. The cultural participants were dropped or forced to withdraw. This was the easiest option when there was no one to champion the city's creative assets against the commercial value of the land, or to put the emotional demands and political clout of a group of bereaved families opposed to the presence of cultural institutions as possible sources of disrespect for the dead or controversial interpretations of democracy into the proper perspective of the area's larger destiny. Grief became the unexpected and untouchable third rail that derailed the plan. The ultimate irony was the supine acceptance of precensorship where the nation's freedoms were to be celebrated.

The only reference to the idea of planning was made by occasionally invoking the name of Robert Moses as the man who "got things done." Although it is impossible to overstate the complexity of the problems involved at Ground Zero, what was needed there was not a Robert Moses breaking heads and eggs, but someone more in the mold of Edward J. Logue, the planner who successfully rebuilt New Haven and Boston in the downbeat decades of the 1950s and 60s, and brought Roosevelt Island through conception to completion in New York in the 1970s. After presidents and public officials had walked the smoking ruins of the South Bronx, it was Logue who brought hope and an ultimately successful housing model to the ashes of the infamous Charlotte Street.

Logue was the kind of smart, tough, dedicated professional who would have provided the leadership that Ground Zero needed desperately and never had. Unlike the autocratic Moses, he was a remarkable human being who cared about people as much as he revered the quality of the environment. A practical visionary, he knew how to implement a plan without rolling over to every political constituency and special interest. And he got things done. After decades of turning dreams into reality, he knew a lot about what made cities good places to live and work.

He operated under rules we might not sanction now, using the draconian slum clearance of the 1960s as a tool to revitalize dying cities, but he did it with style and sensitivity. His belief in the future and his willingness to gamble on it was ultimately undone by New York state's "full faith and credit" bonds -- with their risky guarantees backed by the state's word rather than its money; his affordable housing programs, which he believed in and actually built, were the victim of the 1970s recession when he stretched his credit too far.

Logue died in 2000 at the age of 78, and I don't know if we even have his counterpart today. Mention his name to most people and you draw a blank, that is how completely he has been forgotten. It is unlikely that anyone in the city's power structure would recognize his capabilities if they were to meet him now. They wouldn't care; it's not their game.

It was never inevitable that the greatest opportunity growing out of the greatest disaster in the city's history should be so badly squandered. The critical factor that did Ground Zero in was the denial of the professional planning role essential to coordinate and execute an effort of this magnitude, while keeping its priorities and promises alive. Its greatest failure may be the fact that no one appeared to be aware that such a role, person, or process, ever existed. We know all about deals, and that is what we got in the end.

Ms. Huxtable is the Journal's chief architecture critic.
__________________
"I want to wake up in the city that never sleeps"
     
     
  #3466  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2008, 9:23 AM
Dequal's Avatar
Dequal Dequal is offline
Architecture student
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ghent
Posts: 138
It's sad that they think things like that. They should be happy.
__________________
My Flickr :: FrédericLouis.be - photography|architecture
All scale models of skyscrapers can be found here.
     
     
  #3467  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2008, 3:45 PM
Complex01's Avatar
Complex01 Complex01 is offline
Endless Moments...
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas...
Posts: 2,927
Its coming along. Very Nice...

     
     
  #3468  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 1:21 AM
Apathanoia Apathanoia is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dequal View Post
It's sad that they think things like that. They should be happy.
You think that's bad? Take a look at this.

http://www.downtownexpress.com/de_277/waitforwtc.html

Wait for W.T.C. trains may be at least 8 years

By Julie Shapiro

The World Trade Center PATH hub will not open until 2016, according to a February 2007 engineering study, a portion of which was obtained by Downtown Express.

The study also pins the completion of Tower 3 at 2014 and Tower 2 at 2015 — two and three years later than Tower 4, which is located farther from the hub.

Since officials are now pushing to speed up the memorial timetable, 2016 may be in effect a bestcase scenario for the PATH station, said a source currently involved in the rebuilding process who spoke to Downtown Express on the condition of anonymity. “The dates could be even longer off,” he said, referring to projects adjacent to the memorial including the hub.

The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation and the Lower Manhattan Construction Command Center commissioned the risk-based study to get a realistic set of completion dates for the World Trade Center projects. The study’s results slashed the Port Authority’s construction timeline, listing delays between several months and five years for every project.

News reports earlier this year revealed L.M.D.C. warnings of schedule delays in December 2007, but it has not been previously reported that the first warnings came ten months earlier, just as the Spitzer administration was taking over. The Daily News reported that based on a memo in December, the hub would open in 2014, not in 2016 — the year the rebuilding source now thinks may be too optimistic.

The Port Authority has never directly addressed the study’s findings, and Port officials continued repeating unrealistic dates to the public for more than a year after the study was completed.

When Gov. David Paterson asked Chris Ward, the Port’s new executive director, to examine the W.T.C. rebuilding schedule in June, Ward did his own study and came up with dates similar to the ones the L.M.D.C. had found early in 2007, a Downtown real estate source said.

“That’s when they realized, ‘We’ve got a big problem on our hands,’” the source said.

The L.M.D.C.’s 2007 study also says the Freedom Tower will not open until 2014 and the memorial museum will not open until 2015.

Ward is working with the World Trade Center stakeholders to prepare a new timetable, which he will release by Sept. 30. His goal is to bring the projects closer to their original schedules and budgets.

Julie Menin, chairperson of Community Board 1, said she doesn’t have to look far to predict what the impact of the site’s delays will be.

“The impact is already there,” she said, referring to small businesses that are counting on foot traffic from the rebuilt W.T.C. “People’s faith and confidence in the neighborhood ends up being shaken.”

Steve Coleman, a spokesperson for the Port Authority, said this week that the 2007 study is more of a worst-case scenario than a timeline, and he declined to comment on whether the study’s dates are still realistic estimates.

It would be premature to guesstimate on specific timetables [before Ward gives his report],” Coleman said. “That’s what [officials] did before — they guesstimated and then they had to redo them all.”

The biggest source of the delays is the fact that each project overlaps with others.

“Everything is tied in together,” said the source currently involved in the rebuilding. For example, construction on one project may require the Port Authority to use another part of the site as a staging area, preventing work from moving forward there.

When two projects conflicted, the 2007 study prioritized the project that was closer to completion.

Ward’s Steering Committee is looking at potential conflicts to decide on priorities for the site. The top priority, the Steering Committee decided, will be to open the permanent memorial, including the reflecting pools in the tower footprints, by the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, several sources said.

But Menin, who is also on the board of the National September 11 Memorial & Museum, heard that the Port Authority was thinking of opening the memorial temporarily and then closing it, which she said was not acceptable.

“In this society, dates matter,” said Joe Daniels, president of the memorial organization. “They’re symbolic, but there’s meaning behind the symbolism…. We have three years to finish the building of the memorial. The bottom line is we should be able to do it.”

But Daniels won’t be able to open the memorial on time unless the Port Authority agrees to redesign a belowground portion of the PATH hub, he said.

The northeast corner of the memorial plaza sits atop the underground PATH station. Daniels needs the Port Authority to put the roof on that part of the PATH station by July 2010 if he is going to finish the tree-studded memorial by 9/11/11. The problem is that current designs for the underground PATH hall would require the roof to stay off for much longer, preventing Daniels from opening the plaza on time. Ward’s Steering Committee has to decide whether they want to redesign the PATH hall to allow the memorial work to happen earlier.

“That’s the most important decision we need to have made,” Daniels said.

If he wins that battle, his next challenge will be figuring out how to open the memorial in the midst of a construction site, without the infrastructure that the finished World Trade Center will have. The questions abound: How will pedestrians access the secure site? Where will tour buses drop off the millions of visitors expected and park? How will visitors be kept safe as five Empire State Buildings rise around them?

Daniels doesn’t know the final answers to these questions yet, but he said construction happens every day in this densely packed city, and while the challenges will take work to resolve, he said they are manageable. One possibility is creating a buffer zone between the memorial and the construction.

Once the memorial issues are resolved, the next thing on Daniels’s plate is getting the 9/11 memorial museum open. The L.M.D.C.’s 2007 report said the museum would not open until 2015, but Daniels is pushing for a 2012 opening date. He recognizes that that will require another slew of coordination decisions, which will be more complex because the memorial is underground.

Ward’s Steering Committee has met three times to weigh options for the W.T.C. site, and the project causing the most difficulty is Santiago Calatrava’s PATH hub, a Downtown real estate source said.

“People think of the above-grade oculus, but that’s just the tip of the iceberg,” the source said. “The whole PATH infrastructure is connected to every part of the site.”

The design by Calatrava, an artist, architect and engineer, is patterned after a bird in flight and was the most universally praised W.T.C. design when it was unveiled nearly five years ago.

The steel to build it will have to come from Spain, because no one in the United States can manufacture it, the source said. No two pieces of steel in the design are the same, so putting the pieces together is akin to “a giant jigsaw puzzle,” he said. That’s true of the below-ground parts in addition to the above-ground wings.

“A lot of what makes it beautiful is its uniqueness, which is fine if you’re building a sculpture, but tricky if you’re building a train station,” the source said. “The Port Authority is working around the clock to try to fix the problem.”

One of the key proposals in the L.M.D.C.’s 2007 report was to simplify the design for the PATH station, which would save money and allow other projects to move forward, the report says.

The design of the PATH station is also one of the 15 issues the Port has pledged to resolve by the end of September. Ward has already announced that Calatrava’s white wings will no longer open.

The complexities and delays predicted for the PATH station had a ripple effect on the surrounding projects in the L.M.D.C.’s 2007 study. The reason Towers 2 and 3 were delayed is because they abut the PATH hub, a Downtown real estate source said. Tower 4 faced only a year-long delay, to 2012, because it is farther from the PATH station, the source said.

Silverstein Properties and the L.M.D.C. declined to comment for this article.

The February 2007 study also noted a delay on the demolition of 130 Liberty St., the former Deutsche Bank building. The L.M.D.C. had promised the building would be down by the end of 2007, but the study lists April 2008 as the revised date. However, for months after the study was completed, the L.M.D.C. continued to publicly state that the building would be down by the end of 2007, despite growing skepticism of C.B. 1 members. A fire at the Deutsche Bank building in August 2007 killed two firefighters and delayed the demolition goal to the middle of 2009.

With all the discussion about future deadlines, there’s one looming over the Port Authority right now — and an expensive one at that.

The Port Authority was supposed to turn the excavated site for Tower 2 over to Silverstein Properties by July 1, and the Port has been paying Silverstein a $300,000-a-day penalty since then. The Port has since said they would complete the excavation work by the end of August, but now the clock is ticking down on that revised deadline as well.

“We’re working to meet the deadline,” Coleman, the Port spokesperson, said Wednesday. He would not say whether the Sunday deadline was realistic.

Ward, the Port’s executive director, has said that he would use previous studies of the World Trade Center site’s timetable to inform his work this summer. He apparently has already taken one of the February 2007 study’s recommendations to heart: The study recommends creating a group of project stakeholders, led by the Port Authority, to make decisions about the site. The Steering Committee Ward announced last June is just that, though Ward declined to say then who was in charge of it.

The “committee of stakeholders” structure is very different from the chain of command back when Guy Tozzoli was running the show in the 1960s, ’70s and ’80s.

Tozzoli, now 86, was director of the Port’s World Trade Department, charged with planning, designing, building, renting and operating the World Trade Center.

“When I was in charge, I was in charge of everything,” Tozzoli told Downtown Express this week. “It was easy — I was the guy they came to.”

People familiar with the Steering Committee’s work this summer agreed that the Calatrava hub will face some design changes, but Ward appeared to be hinting that even more drastic changes were on the horizon during a speech at 7 W.T.C. two weeks ago. Although the speech focused on continuing regional economic growth in an environmentally friendly way, Ward closed by mentioning renowned architect Cass Gilbert — perhaps the Santiago Calatrava of nearly a century ago.

Ward showed a rendering of Gilbert’s original and never-built 1926 drawings of the George Washington Bridge with majestic stone arches. Then he showed a picture of the present-day bridge, which was designed by engineer Othmar Ammann. When the bridge opened in 1931 it was derided as “less than first class” and an embarrassing version of what could have been, Ward said, but today, the bridge’s design is considered an architectural marvel.

He said the lesson is that even within budgets, “we can still build greatness.”

With reporting
by Josh Rogers
__________________
Do not misunderestimate the stupidity of our politicians. Or any politician, for that matter.

Last edited by Apathanoia; Aug 29, 2008 at 1:22 AM. Reason: getting rid of unnecessary break line
     
     
  #3469  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 2:05 AM
CoolCzech's Avatar
CoolCzech CoolCzech is offline
Frigidus Maximus
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,618
Can somebody tell the PA, "Just shut up and build!"?
__________________
http://tinyurl.com/2acxb5t


I ❤️ NY
     
     
  #3470  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 2:18 AM
theWatusi's Avatar
theWatusi theWatusi is offline
Resident Jackass
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Your Mom's House
Posts: 11,702
Umm they are building it.

     
     
  #3471  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 3:21 AM
kenratboy kenratboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolCzech View Post
Can somebody tell the PA, "Just shut up and build!"?
Sure, allow them to shut down Lower Manhattan for 18 months and it will be all done in no time!
     
     
  #3472  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 11:36 AM
CoolCzech's Avatar
CoolCzech CoolCzech is offline
Frigidus Maximus
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by theWatusi View Post
Umm they are building it.
I think the operative term was, "shut up." I know they are building, though taking into the middle of the next decade seems just a little too slow, don't you think? I can appreciate the complexities of the site - but Jeesh, what about the implications of keeping Lower Manhattan one vast construction site for 1.5 decades? But in the interest of keeping up morale - the PA should shy away from worst case scenario descriptions and stick to building. You know... "shut up and build."
__________________
http://tinyurl.com/2acxb5t


I ❤️ NY
     
     
  #3473  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 12:26 PM
trvlr70 trvlr70 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 2,245
The completion dates[which are subject to being pushed back even further] are ridiculous. The state of the art designs will be outdated relics by that time.

Step on, NYC!
     
     
  #3474  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 3:05 PM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,749
By no means am I convinced that it’ll take as long as stated. In the best interests of the project and the people involved, the worst case scenario always has to make an appearance in order to prevent any surprises down the road, because that’ll only lead to more conflict and complications if not previously stated.

As I’ve said before, this is an ‘open minded’ project. The good news is that construction is going on and when it’s finished it’s finished. Frankly there is nothing we can do about it, but just keep a positive and open mind.

Honestly I think the P.A. is just looking for breathing room which calls for this ‘eight year minimum’. That doesn’t mean it’ll take that long, but having that time will allow them to sleep better at night. Larry is running a tight shift down there and I’m sure that no one is just sitting around. Work is getting done.
__________________
"I'm going there, but I like it here wherever it is.."
     
     
  #3475  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 5:26 PM
37TimPPG 37TimPPG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 212
Mayor Bloomberg has been uncharacteristically quiet during all this mess. Maybe Hizzoner should be screaming for an accelerated timetable?

I can't believe it is going to take this long to build a damn skyscraper!? I mean, seriously, Goldman Sachs has already been topped out and FT just poked its nose above ground within the last 6 weeks.

Port Authority should just stick to planes, trains and busses and give the whole damn site (INCLUDING FT!) over to Mr. Silverstein!

Proof once again that the minute politicians get their hands on ANYTHING it is f***ed up!
     
     
  #3476  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 5:52 PM
NYC4Life's Avatar
NYC4Life NYC4Life is offline
The Time To Build Is Now
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 3,004
Silverstein should take over all Port Authority venues and operations.
__________________
"I want to wake up in the city that never sleeps"
     
     
  #3477  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 7:03 PM
37TimPPG 37TimPPG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 212
After viewing the live webcam it looks as though another order of steel beams has been delivered and stored just off the bottom of the supply ramp.

Could the FT superstructure rise some more in the coming days???
     
     
  #3478  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2008, 8:11 PM
androo3's Avatar
androo3 androo3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYC4Life View Post
Silverstein should take over all Port Authority venues and operations.
They better hurry up... the guy looks pretty old he may not make it to see it finished
     
     
  #3479  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2008, 4:46 AM
vskyline81's Avatar
vskyline81 vskyline81 is offline
Pleasure Delayer
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ------
Posts: 1,175
A couple of shots I took on Thursday (August 28th)







__________________
"Like everyone else, you want to learn the way to win but never to accept the way to lose. To accept defeat, to learn to die is to be liberated from it."
     
     
  #3480  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2008, 4:57 AM
Ghost's Avatar
Ghost Ghost is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 251
Quote:
Originally Posted by 37TimPPG View Post
After viewing the live webcam it looks as though another order of steel beams has been delivered and stored just off the bottom of the supply ramp.
I think those beams are for the memorial... From lowermanhattan.info:
- Steel installation scheduled to begin September 1, 2008
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:20 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.