HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Photography Forums > General Photography


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1521  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2012, 1:57 AM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Penticton
Posts: 3,757
D600 formally announced:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/09...ed-1080p-video

Highlights:

full frame
24MP
100% coverage
39 AF points
1080p HD video
$2,099 list
__________________
Support the mob or mysteriously disappear...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1522  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2012, 12:26 AM
diskojoe's Avatar
diskojoe diskojoe is offline
3rd Coast King
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulliver View Post
D600 formally announced:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/09...ed-1080p-video

Highlights:

full frame
24MP
100% coverage
39 AF points
1080p HD video
$2,099 list
Sony announced the a99 too. Full frame madness everywhere.
__________________
Photo Threads
Flickr
Facebook

My Book
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1523  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2012, 5:24 PM
ThatDarnSacramentan ThatDarnSacramentan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,048
Ritz Camera is going under:



My local Ritz is taking things even further, with some lenses marked at 60% off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1524  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2012, 6:10 AM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,742
Fujifilm announced new mirrorless camera, X-E1. Around $700 cheaper and more compact than X-Pro1 and has a built-in flash, but no hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder and bundled with a standard zoom lens instead of a fast prime.

I think I will buy new camera after all, but I'll wait for X-Pro1 to be discontinued and sold at clearance price in 1-2 years. I figure I will be eventually forced to buy new camera soon no matter what. How long do digital cameras last anyways? My current camera is 8 years old :/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1525  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2012, 1:58 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,184
The electronics (pcb and chips) in a digital camera should last a very long time. Heat, corrosion and water damage ruin electronics. In normal conditions, they might last decades. Any moving parts, like a shutter or mirror will wear out over time. My old Nikon D50 has well over 50,000 shutter activations and is still going strong. I have no idea what the lifespan is for an image sensor, but like other electronic parts, they probably last many years. The other point of failure would be the battery, which is usually replaceable.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1526  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2012, 2:01 PM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Penticton
Posts: 3,757
Yes, I could see the shutter/mirror failing before the sensor itself.
__________________
Support the mob or mysteriously disappear...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1527  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2012, 12:45 AM
diskojoe's Avatar
diskojoe diskojoe is offline
3rd Coast King
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady View Post
Fujifilm announced new mirrorless camera, X-E1. Around $700 cheaper and more compact than X-Pro1 and has a built-in flash, but no hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder and bundled with a standard zoom lens instead of a fast prime.

I think I will buy new camera after all, but I'll wait for X-Pro1 to be discontinued and sold at clearance price in 1-2 years. I figure I will be eventually forced to buy new camera soon no matter what. How long do digital cameras last anyways? My current camera is 8 years old :/
I like the look of these fuji cameras they have coming out. My issue is that the lenses are still pretty limited. Of course they did come out with an M-mount adaptor which is pretty swank. Get you some leica action. The nex 7 is a decent options as well and has lots of good lens options. Slr magic has come out with some really nice hyper-prime action for the e-mount.
__________________
Photo Threads
Flickr
Facebook

My Book
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1528  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2012, 9:49 PM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,742
M lenses reportedly don't work well with digital (M8 and M9 have special sensor to deal with them). I think it's better to buy lenses designed with digital and a smaller sensor in mind, but that's just me I guess.

Fujifilm already released 3 compact, fast primes, and that's what I want - no more slow, bulky zoom lenses for me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flar View Post
The electronics (pcb and chips) in a digital camera should last a very long time. Heat, corrosion and water damage ruin electronics. In normal conditions, they might last decades. Any moving parts, like a shutter or mirror will wear out over time. My old Nikon D50 has well over 50,000 shutter activations and is still going strong.
Interesting, my Olympus C-7070 is probably same age as your D50. I know higher end cameras are guaranteed for 100k shutter count or 150k, etc. minimum. Lower-end have no such guarantee.

According to this: http://www.olegkikin.com/shutterlife/nikon_d50.htm D50 has 80% survival at 48k-64k count, and survival rate declines dramatically after that.

Mine is a point-and shoot though, electronic shutter instead mechanical, so shutter count makes no difference, though there are other mechanical parts such as the dials and zooming.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1529  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2012, 12:35 AM
diskojoe's Avatar
diskojoe diskojoe is offline
3rd Coast King
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady View Post
M lenses reportedly don't work well with digital (M8 and M9 have special sensor to deal with them). I think it's better to buy lenses designed with digital and a smaller sensor in mind, but that's just me I guess.

Fujifilm already released 3 compact, fast primes, and that's what I want - no more slow, bulky zoom lenses for me.
They came out with a fuji branded converter for m-lenses. Maybe they know something you dont

http://www.adorama.com/IFJXP1MA.html...FSemPAodgC4AZw
__________________
Photo Threads
Flickr
Facebook

My Book
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1530  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2012, 2:19 AM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by diskojoe View Post
They came out with a fuji branded converter for m-lenses. Maybe they know something you dont

http://www.adorama.com/IFJXP1MA.html...FSemPAodgC4AZw
Seriously? They even talk about the problems of the M lenses right in the description:

"Three levels of distortion correction are also available to combat barrel distortion on wide-angle lenses, and pincushion distortion on telephoto lenses. Users can select from Strong, Medium or Weak correction, or simply turn any correction off.

Peripheral illumination controls the amount of darkening at the four corners of an image. Eleven levels of correction can be applied from +5 to -5 (including ?0?) with users given the choice of darkening the corners of the image to emphasise a central subject or lightening edges for more even illumination across the frame.

Finally, color shading correction allows each corner of the frame to be color corrected to combat any shift in color between the center and edges of the frame. Corrections can be made to red/cyan color shading and blue/yellow color shading from -9 to +9 relative to the green channel."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1531  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2012, 5:00 PM
Okayyou's Avatar
Okayyou Okayyou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,255
Just a rumor right now but there is talk of a new Canon body with very high megapixels (46) and improved dynamic range over their current sensors. The sensor might be larger than full frame.

http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/09/4...plus-2012-cr1/

http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/09/m...ixel-talk-cr1/

Hopefully it doesn't cost as much as other medium format cameras.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1532  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2012, 2:04 PM
diskojoe's Avatar
diskojoe diskojoe is offline
3rd Coast King
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady View Post
Seriously? They even talk about the problems of the M lenses right in the description:

"Three levels of distortion correction are also available to combat barrel distortion on wide-angle lenses, and pincushion distortion on telephoto lenses. Users can select from Strong, Medium or Weak correction, or simply turn any correction off.

Peripheral illumination controls the amount of darkening at the four corners of an image. Eleven levels of correction can be applied from +5 to -5 (including ?0?) with users given the choice of darkening the corners of the image to emphasise a central subject or lightening edges for more even illumination across the frame.

Finally, color shading correction allows each corner of the frame to be color corrected to combat any shift in color between the center and edges of the frame. Corrections can be made to red/cyan color shading and blue/yellow color shading from -9 to +9 relative to the green channel."
You could go nex7 with slr magic hyperprime action. They make a 35 and a 50 that go to 0.95.
__________________
Photo Threads
Flickr
Facebook

My Book
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1533  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2012, 3:55 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,184
It's almost getting to the point where any camera is good enough for most purposes, unless you're doing something specific or making large prints. About half the photos in my latest thread were taken with my phone: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=202053
A couple are obvious, but can you really tell which ones?

The answers are under the spoiler below

__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1534  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2012, 2:31 AM
Okayyou's Avatar
Okayyou Okayyou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,255
I think the camera on a new smartphone is about where point and shoots were in 2007. For general purpose shots a phone will work and the images look ok on FB or when presented in a photothread at reduced resolution. However camera phones are extremely limited with their wide lenses, slow focusing, lack of depth of field, poor low light performance, etc. But wide angle city shots during the day... that works.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1535  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2012, 3:39 AM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,184
Obviously a phone isn't a dslr. I came to it with no expectation that I would be able to get usable shots, but I'm pleasantly surprised. It's far better than my point and shoot, which was a decent camera in 2006. Compared to that camera, the phone focuses faster, has much less shutter lag (it can actually shoot 6fps), does better macro, is wider, has far better high ISO performance, and has more convenience features like smile detection and panoramas. Surprising dynamic range. Doesn't zoom though.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1536  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2012, 5:34 AM
entheosfog's Avatar
entheosfog entheosfog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Okayyou View Post
I think the camera on a new smartphone is about where point and shoots were in 2007. For general purpose shots a phone will work and the images look ok on FB or when presented in a photothread at reduced resolution. However camera phones are extremely limited with their wide lenses, slow focusing, lack of depth of field, poor low light performance, etc. But wide angle city shots during the day... that works.
I agree. When I take well lit photos on my phone, they turn out great. As soon as the light level goes down, some look good on the phone. But as soon as I get it onto my computer, the results are often disappointing. Lots of noise. But I find having a decent camera on me at all times is a huge bonus
__________________
Latest photo thread: Coney Island, Christmas Day
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1537  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2012, 12:34 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,184
^^I had been thinking of getting a point and shoot for the past year or so for that very reason (My old Kodak point and shoot is too big for my pocket and is so crappy I haven't been able to use it for the last few years). I just couldn't find one that I liked. The phone will fill the bill, I just need to modify it so the volume button works the shutter.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1538  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2012, 6:18 PM
diskojoe's Avatar
diskojoe diskojoe is offline
3rd Coast King
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,671
Speaking of point and clicks. Wish I had the bank for this little camera. Smallest full frame to date. Goes to ISo 25600 and has a Zeiss 35mm f2. Wish it had a built in viewfinder but you can buy an attachment for it.


Sony RX-1
__________________
Photo Threads
Flickr
Facebook

My Book
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1539  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2012, 2:25 AM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Question... so, the girl moved and left me alone here in Denver. And she took my cameras with her. Grr. But that means, I need something new.

I am a Canon guy... I want a general walkaround DSLR. Looking at body only. Don't want to spend the money for a 5D (or even the new 6D) just now.

That leaves me the 7D, the 60D, or a T4i. I hate to admit it, but despite the better specs in the 7D, for my walkaround/travel body, I kind of want the tilty LCD in back.

Which brings me to the 60D. Anybody have any experience with it? I am deathly afraid that I'll buy it tomorrow, and the 70D will be announced Wednesday... but that said, it seems reasonable enough. Plastic body isn't great, but it's weather sealed, and I tend not to drop stuff, so that's all that matters.

I've got a Death Valley/Joshua Tree road trip, and a Middle East trip in the next two months, so I am on a clock. And not sure I want to do it with solely with my fun little S100.

Thoughts? I'd appreciate any firsthand experience anybody has.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1540  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2012, 3:11 AM
Witty Nickname's Avatar
Witty Nickname Witty Nickname is offline
Look up, Waaaaaay up
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,348
__________________
I am Calgarian!
My photos on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Photography Forums > General Photography
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:20 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.