i think he was suggesting that the vatican is only a tourist destination, which in fact is, but
also the head of the catholic church, a religion which is far from dead. but let's leave that out of this thread please, and stick to the construction of this (and for a moment the mosque which even though is a bit off topic, is neighboring this behemoth).
Quote:
Originally Posted by GulfArabia
|
but anyways, there is in-fact a structure around the kaa'ba in that picture, those beautiful arches and domes. those had historic value and could have been saved. but the past is the past so nothing can be done.
moving on, i believe the building
does matter. everything matters when designing a structure which will see millions and millions of people each year. plus, if the building didn't matter it wouldn't have so many intricate (faux) details like the arches, the golden stars on the columns, giant chandeliers, etc. the structure itself might be cheaper, but the amount of details put into this building probably puts it in-par with what having simple details, but a challenging structure would have cost (the atkins design would've been quite a feat of engineering and would impress people worldwide).
Back to details, I think something simple would probably actually prove that the building didn't matter because it wouldn't be so distracting and have so much going on on the inside.
plus the atkins design allowed worshipers to view the kaa'ba from both the first and second floor.
Gulf, can you please create a proper thread for the expansion of the mosque on the General Developments section? That way I can move these posts onto the proper thread (and we can finally get more international threads in that section). Thanks in advance.