Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeLocker
The "energy" of a city is a sign of youth. It makes perfect sense that people seek out urban areas that resemble college campuses once they start their careers.
|
Variety is another big factor. When a busy downtown area is novel it's fun. When you are just trying to run errands or get to work it is less fun.
One challenge Toronto has, like Vancouver, is the so-called "missing middle". At this point most people can only either live in a high density area or in an at best second-rate quasi-suburban area. There are some denser village-like areas but they are in short supply, they're not being built anymore, and as a result they are already expensive. If the average middle class Toronto experience were Cabbagetown or Leaside people would be pretty happy.
I'm not really sure what the solution is since the Baby Boomer generation decided that 1950's bungalow neighbourhoods must be trapped in amber while much rarer and more valuable historical areas get torn down and replaced with condos. The fastest-growing and newest cities are being constrained and harmed the most by these bad planning policies.
My biggest worry in Vancouver is that I will end up losing a lot of my friends because they will give up on the city and get sick of living in subpar rentals when they are middle aged. I own my place and I am in a stable financial situation but it still doesn't feel very stable socially. I am in my 30's so most of my cohort is in a precarious situation similar to what 18 year olds lived in in 1982, except with less family support and more debt on average. The typical 30 year old I know has about 1.2 university degrees, 0 kids, a crappy job, no car and probably no license, has lived in 4 or 5 different places in recent years, and does not know with any certainty if they will be able to live where they are in 2-5 years.