HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2013, 5:39 AM
Alon Alon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 219
Is there a real service need for this? The #16 is a very busy bus, but is there a lot of demand along Arbutus as opposed to between Arbutus and Downtown/Hastings?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2013, 6:43 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant
Posts: 6,866
I believe that the peak total demand for transport into DT Vancouver from the south metro, by all modes combined (car, bus, train, etc.,) can be met by the canada line. if i read the traffic screenline report right, canada line has enough capacity to handle peak absolute demand (15 000 pphpd).

Last edited by logan5; Jan 30, 2013 at 6:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2013, 6:46 AM
Alon Alon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 219
It's not just a capacity question. If there are a lot of people getting on the #16 on Arbutus riding to Downtown, then light rail to Granville Island doesn't meet their transportation needs and will not get their patronage; they'd be better served by building the UBC extension faster, so that they could go from Broadway and Arbutus to City Hall and transfer there to the Canada Line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2013, 6:55 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant
Posts: 6,866
I assume an arbutus line would terminate in downtown vancouver. I would guess for most residents along arbutus, it would be faster to ride east on the bus to connect to the canada line to get downtown. If you live close to downtown, then a one ticket ride on the bus would probly be preferable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2013, 11:08 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,361
Agreed. If Artbutus is built out as LRT in 20 years or more, I could see it crossing Granville Bridge (as long as they don't remove all usable RoW space for that pedestrian path).

Even if "Combo 1"

http://www.translink.ca/en/Plans-and...e-Designs.aspx

is built and extended down Arbutus, I would expect an Arbutus extension to eventually include a False Creek crossing to downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2013, 1:46 AM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,921
I had always imagined 2 uses for arbutus, hopefully in conjunction (one stacked above the other). 1 would be access for heavy rail transit south through Richmond, then east to Surrey, Langley, Abbotsford, and maybe even Chilliwack/Hope. The other use would be as a HSR line south to Seattle, Portland, and maybe someday the California coast.
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2013, 1:58 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Mind View Post
I had always imagined 2 uses for arbutus, hopefully in conjunction (one stacked above the other). 1 would be access for heavy rail transit south through Richmond, then east to Surrey, Langley, Abbotsford, and maybe even Chilliwack/Hope. The other use would be as a HSR line south to Seattle, Portland, and maybe someday the California coast.
Why would HSR or heavy rail go down that path? They'd be better suited along Highway 1 and the Grandview Cut.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2013, 2:01 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,361
Agreed, that's way too far west.
Take a ruler north from Blaine (which itself may be west of an HSR route) and draw a line northwards.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2013, 2:45 AM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jebby View Post
Why would HSR or heavy rail go down that path? They'd be better suited along Highway 1 and the Grandview Cut.
Would they share the PMB? cause there isn't a lot of room left around PMB for a rail crossing.
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2013, 1:17 AM
MetroRailRoad MetroRailRoad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 50
I do't think there is a need to build a rail line down the Arbutus corridor at the moment. The most recent proposal that I am aware of is the Canada Line running down Arbutus, but that was rejected in favor of building it down Cambie street. I believe this was because there is little use for such a line down that corridor.
__________________
My rapid transit site
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2013, 5:30 AM
Conrad Yablonski's Avatar
Conrad Yablonski Conrad Yablonski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 682
Nominated for The Largest Load of Wank in decades-rarely have so few wasted so much electricity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 5:52 AM
AverageJoe AverageJoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 141
Well this is an interesting development...
Trains may run again on Westside Vancouver's Arbutus corridor

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/met...138/story.html

Quote:
"Ed Greenberg, a CP spokesman, said the railway company is clearing out brush along the line as well as surveying its property lines. 'We are doing a new survey to ensure we have a current record of our property,' he said. 'We are continuing to explore operational options for the line, but no decisions have been made at this time.'"

I would guess CP would be fully within their right to operate whatever trains they want on their railway. It might not be neighbourly but business is business... I'd imagine the right-of-way Starbucks owner would be rather concerned about this development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 6:17 AM
logicbomb logicbomb is offline
Joshua B.
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 962
I doubt we'll ever see a train run along the ROW, simply because there's no longer any industrial lands along the Arbutus Corridor or the Northern False Creek areas.

Would it solely service the Molson Brewery? Doubt it, the cost of re-implementing the line would exceed any potential benefit.

I think this is CP trying to irk local residents (who are now shitting their pants at the thought of having trains through their neighborhood), who will in turn begin to pressure the City into allowing CP to re-develop the lands. CP just recently abandoned the Marpole segment that runs west of Oak (which continues on as the Arbutus line) and the Marpole Spur is barely holding on nowadays too (guessing the segment will be abandoned in a few years).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 6:59 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by logicbomb View Post
I think this is CP trying to irk local residents (who are now shitting their pants at the thought of having trains through their neighborhood), who will in turn begin to pressure the City into allowing CP to re-develop the lands.
I suspect it's more likely that they want a survey of their property so they have a legal record of ownership that they can use for whatever they're planning. With Hunter Harrison now at the helm, and knowing that he can't abide waste or idle assets, it's even possible that they may be finally ready to consider selling.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 2:26 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by AverageJoe View Post
I'd imagine the right-of-way Starbucks owner would be rather concerned about this development.
Interestingly, that Starbucks property was put up for sale just a few months ago...not sure if it sold.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 4:23 PM
theKB theKB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 906
Would be interesting to pop in an LRT type route along this line...

One can dream
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 5:53 PM
Tetsuo Tetsuo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,382
Does anyone have history about the former Steveston ROW along Railway Ave in Richmond. Amazing to think Richmond city only paid CP $2 million for the entire stretch.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 7:35 PM
theho theho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 12
I have imagined that since the Arbutus corridor does not have that many level crossings that a mostly grade separated service would be possible if they trenched those crossings. (maybe covered below grade stations?). There is probably a ton of other infrastructure in the way under those crossings though. It'd be cool if it could some how terminate (or at least reach) at Marine Drive Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 7:51 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by theho View Post
I have imagined that since the Arbutus corridor does not have that many level crossings that a mostly grade separated service would be possible if they trenched those crossings. (maybe covered below grade stations?). There is probably a ton of other infrastructure in the way under those crossings though. It'd be cool if it could some how terminate (or at least reach) at Marine Drive Station.
Agreed. Cutting south through Point Grey slices through too many major east-west streets for this not to be grade-separated, even partially, as you say. Parts of it already have a route, down beside Arbutus itself, then up the tight curve on the escarpment and on to 41st. That station might need to be underground, too. But, hey, terminating as Marine Drive station would be great.
Where do you see it starting from in the other direction?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted May 9, 2014, 9:04 PM
theKB theKB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 906
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
Agreed. Cutting south through Point Grey slices through too many major east-west streets for this not to be grade-separated, even partially, as you say. Parts of it already have a route, down beside Arbutus itself, then up the tight curve on the escarpment and on to 41st. That station might need to be underground, too. But, hey, terminating as Marine Drive station would be great.
Where do you see it starting from in the other direction?
Theoretically couldn't they reconnect at granville island somehow and basically take it all the way around down to yaletown?

There is also no reason why they couldn't connect it to marine station as there is track going down to the crossing at the fraser as well as along kent. It would just have to work with the freight traffic down there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:39 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.