Originally Posted by dreambrother808
Forumers are just looking for someone to blame when it comes to their fantasies not coming true. Let's blame the city. Let's act like we live in some horrible, provincial backwater, when the reality is actually far more balanced and mundane, as Jlousa has stated.
Burnaby has better variety? REALLY?
Sometimes I imagine that this forum consists largely of ungrateful teenagers, the kind who think they have it all figured out and complain about their parents' practical, adult counterpoints. But that isn't so, is it? It just seems that way.
The way you word your post makes you sound like some self declared ivory tower intellectual.
I'm sorry if my opinions offend anyone, and for the times I make mistakes. But those are my opinions and my mistakes to make. In this case, my opinion is, cheap or not, Burnaby is able to pull more variety out of it's sleeve than Vancouver. Granted, Vancouver has several unique towers. One Wall, Shangri-La, Woodwards, Shaw, and the Melville all stand on their own. The rest truly seem like cookie cutter designs, some on steroids.