Originally Posted by kwoldtimer
So, Sean Spicer, speaking about the chemical weapon attack in Syria, managed to tell his nation's press today that Hitler had not used chemical weapons (effort to clarify followed, at the invitation of one of the reporters).
Has ever one so unsuited been given a job so impossible?
And why do so many people in and around politics continue not to get that it seldom ends well when you invoke the name of Adolph Hitler?
With all the things going on in the world, that people would try to turn a press secretary trying to shame a world leader for his use of chemical weapons into a politically opportunistic talking point, pretending that this is the most important impactful event to happen in politics in the last 72 hours, speaks volumes about the intellectual honesty of political commentators these days.