HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2008, 12:56 AM
SnyderBock's Avatar
SnyderBock SnyderBock is offline
Robotic Construction
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,833
Here are some current renderings for the Denver Union Station project:





__________________
Automation Is Still the Future

Last edited by SnyderBock; Nov 3, 2008 at 5:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2008, 4:23 AM
llamaorama llamaorama is offline
Unicorn Wizard!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,211
looks great, I like the pedestrian plaza over the tracks that empties onto the platform. Can't wait for all this to build out.

Only thing is why is there a hole in the roof of the train shed? Doesn't that defeat the purpose?

Last edited by llamaorama; Nov 3, 2008 at 4:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2008, 4:31 AM
mr1138 mr1138 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,059
From what I've heard, it is because it's a concept rendering. They have a hole in the roof to show the trains. The final design will cover the top.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2008, 5:48 AM
SnyderBock's Avatar
SnyderBock SnyderBock is offline
Robotic Construction
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,833
Actually, that's pretty close to what's getting built. There is a view plain ordinance... Historical Union Station must be visible from the entire 17th Street transit plaza.

But if you study the plans back on page one of this post, you will eventually discover that large amounts of the platforms are still covered. In those first two renderings I just posted, to the right of the canopy, that is actually an elevated pedestrian platform--thus the train platforms are covered by it. Then the platforms continue under that building further to the right (especially the 1600 foot long AmTrak platform).

So even though there is a gapping hole in the middle, they claim something like 80% of the train platform area will be covered. The middle is left open so Union Station is not obscured from view. It is a historical landmark with a special view plain ordinance, so it cannot be avoided.
__________________
Automation Is Still the Future
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2008, 11:10 PM
jamesinclair jamesinclair is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnyderBock View Post
Actually, that's pretty close to what's getting built. There is a view plain ordinance... Historical Union Station must be visible from the entire 17th Street transit plaza.

But if you study the plans back on page one of this post, you will eventually discover that large amounts of the platforms are still covered. In those first two renderings I just posted, to the right of the canopy, that is actually an elevated pedestrian platform--thus the train platforms are covered by it. Then the platforms continue under that building further to the right (especially the 1600 foot long AmTrak platform).

So even though there is a gapping hole in the middle, they claim something like 80% of the train platform area will be covered. The middle is left open so Union Station is not obscured from view. It is a historical landmark with a special view plain ordinance, so it cannot be avoided.
Thats....retarded
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2008, 12:11 AM
mr1138 mr1138 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,059
I don't see why a hole in the roof is needed to protect the view plane. The canopy comes around in front of the neon sign in two places and yet, if the rendering looking down 17th is to be believed, doesn't block the view plane. I don't see why it couldn't cover the entire platform and just "dip down" to protect the view. I thought I had heard that the renderings showed a hole simply to show a cut away view in conceptual renderings and that the final version would cover the whole thing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2008, 6:05 AM
BroncosCountry BroncosCountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 42
100.66 million annual riders

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnyderBock View Post
Ridership up^
That works out to roughly 276,000 daily riders. Way to go RTD! Think of how high our numbers will be when Fastracks is all done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2008, 7:13 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,384
^
IIRC, the combined projected ridership of all the rail lines was something like 200-250k.

Some of those FasTracks riders will be existing bus users (not to mention existing LRT), so you can't just double the bus ridership, but still, I think it's fair to guess RTD will be around 400k daily riders once FasTracks is done. And it will go up from there over time.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 5:56 PM
PLANSIT's Avatar
PLANSIT PLANSIT is offline
ColoRADo
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,319
^How does that compare to other metros?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 10:06 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,384
It would vault Denver to the top of the second tier.

That is to say, ahead of places like Dallas, Miami, and even Portland (by rail, if not rail+bus), but still well behind the Washingtons and Chicagos of the world.

New York isn't so much another "tier" as it is another universe.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 10:09 PM
SnyderBock's Avatar
SnyderBock SnyderBock is offline
Robotic Construction
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,833
Well, Denver will be a metro area of roughly 3.2 million in 2018. So if daily ridership starts out at 400,000 people upon FasTracks completion, then climbs upward from there; I would say that is exceptional for a medium sized US city.
__________________
Automation Is Still the Future
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2008, 10:44 PM
SnyderBock's Avatar
SnyderBock SnyderBock is offline
Robotic Construction
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,833
Here are the latest depictions of Union Station:







===================================================================

Union Station Front South Side:




===================================================================

Union Station Front North Side:








===================================================================

Elevated Platform:








Train Room:


===================================================================

Back of Union Station (Wewatta Plaza):




===================================================================

17th Street Transit Plaza:






===================================================================

Light Rail Terminal (Opposite end from Union Station):


The Whole Picture:








===================================================================

Schedule:


Circulator Bus:


Underground Circulator Bus:


The Underground Portion (Under 17th Street) Connecting Union Station with Light Rail terminal:
__________________
Automation Is Still the Future
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2009, 10:58 PM
SnyderBock's Avatar
SnyderBock SnyderBock is offline
Robotic Construction
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,833
Here is a new report issued with much more detailed engineering. Union Station development gets underway later this year.

New detailed report with high quality renderings

Here is a glimpse of what's in this pdf, click on it and take a look at what Denver Union Station will look like and function like by 2014:
__________________
Automation Is Still the Future
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2009, 11:11 PM
pablosan pablosan is offline
Up Up and Away
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,718
I actually like those concepts.
__________________
DenZone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2009, 3:55 AM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,367
Jealous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2009, 8:44 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,477
Holy ****

Are these just for commuter trains, or long distance... I didn't think you guys had many Amtrak intercity trains??
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2009, 9:57 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,384
There are some Amtrak trains (plus one to the ski resorts), but they are pretty limited. For the most part this is for local service.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2009, 9:22 PM
SnyderBock's Avatar
SnyderBock SnyderBock is offline
Robotic Construction
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,833
If you are interested in this, here is my idea for an inner-city Denver Streetcar system to be built after this suburban system being built now is complete. I actually show it in phases. Dark blue is phase 1. Light Blue is phase 2. Pink is phase 3. Green is what will be built with FasTracks.

I have Civic Center Station serving as the Streetcar Hub. Phase one is all about rebuilding Civic Center Station into a new hub station with the capacity to handle my plan, and connecting it directly with Union Station. I have this Civic center-Union Station line as a possible subway line (as it will be very high capacity, with multiple converging streetcar lines all sharing it. It would stub end below grade in front of Union Station and the escalators would come up directly into the historic Union Station.

After this infrastructure is put in place, the streetcar lines can start growing out from Civic Center Station, in a series of phases.

Now on the Northwest side of Union Station, I have the streetcar lines coming in from the north, right into the Light Rail Terminal proposed for Union Station. Since I am proposing modern streetcars, which are actually just single car light rail vehicles, they would actually be compatible with existing light rail tracks, stations and maintenance facilities. So from Highlands, the streetcar line would travel down Platte Street, cross over the river at 20th Street and come in along the CML into an extended LRT Terminal at Union Station.

Here is the plan, check it out!


And here is how I propose the subway portion of this proposal (~1 mile subway portion) from Civic center Station to Denver Union Station be integrated into Denver Union Station. The pedestrian access to and from the subway platforms would go directly into the Historic Union Station building! As seen on the left side, coming up into the station building (the right side the the Union Station plan being built now for other lines underway).
__________________
Automation Is Still the Future

Last edited by SnyderBock; Apr 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2009, 9:50 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,383
This is truly the kind of stuff that European cities seem to be building on a regular basis, but that Americans haven't even begun to think about.

Kudos to Denver for such an ambitious and AMAZING plan. The shorter size of the office/residential buildings will make them a lot more feasible, since they cost a lot less than skyscrapers. I've long thought that the proclivity of American cities toward ever-taller skyscrapers only harms the streetscape, because skyscrapers tend to satisfy market demand in large amounts at a time, which leaves lots of building sites open as parking lots or vacant lots.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2009, 3:45 AM
Pizzuti Pizzuti is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I've long thought that the proclivity of American cities toward ever-taller skyscrapers only harms the streetscape, because skyscrapers tend to satisfy market demand in large amounts at a time, which leaves lots of building sites open as parking lots or vacant lots.

Hence all the surface parking lots that practically ruined downtown Denver for 2 decades and to this day make some near-downtown neighborhoods (Arapahoe Square) so ugly that no one wants to move there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.