HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3221  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2018, 7:01 PM
tovan tovan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: V
Posts: 54
Build an 8 lane bridge divided into 3 barrier separated sections, with pedestrian/cycling facilities on each side.
- 3 NB lanes
- 2 counterflow (2NB in AM; 2SB in PM)
- 3 SB lanes
Total 5NB/3SB lanes in AM, 3NB/5SB in PM = same lane capacity (5) as the proposed GMB in main direction of travel and 3x current counterflow capacity in the opposite direction during peak times.

When transit demand is there and vehicle trips decline or plateaus in the future, the lanes could be reconfigured to allow for rapid bus/transit:
- 3 NB
- 2 rapid bus/transit
- 3 SB
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3222  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2018, 10:28 PM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
>Assuming anyone actually would WANT to commute by bike or walk on the George Massey Bridge.

It would make for some nice exercise for the residents of Ladner, though. Go up and down the bridge, and that's your exercise for the day. 1 lap, 2 laps if you feel ambitious. That's what I did on the Golden Ears. And yes, the air quality is a problem I deal with...

It'd provide us with excess room for future road expansions, but don't tell anyone that. Losing the pedestrian capability on a bridge here isn't a big deal.

Future ALR use here is almost certainly going to be industrial. It makes no sense to expand residential facilities next to a busy bridge, and next to Deltaport.



Would it? Wouldn't they keep the reversible lanes, then? So 3 lanes general purpose, one HOV rush hour?



Hey, the new 4-lane on the Pautello is still an improvement in every sense of the word. Wider Lanes permitting faster speeds, good pedestrian/cycling connections to New West, less collisions, a direct connection from the SFPR...
Lol at faster speeds. They'll probably still keep it at 50 you know for "safety" and the cops will still be at the Scott Road overpass fishing for drivers being "unsafe".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3223  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2018, 10:36 PM
misher's Avatar
misher misher is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
Lol at faster speeds. They'll probably still keep it at 50 you know for "safety" and the cops will still be at the Scott Road overpass fishing for drivers being "unsafe".
Isn't a bike and pedestrian walkway a requirement on new infrastructure projects?

Think of it this way, worst case motorbikes can take it



Similar to the bike crossing/spider sanctuary under the skytrain bridge from Richmond to Marine Drive that no one knows about (yes you can walk or motorbike from the casino to marine drive!). There's more than 50000 giant spiders on it (above and between all the railings so its like a cave of spiderwebs) so everyone's too scared to use it now.


Last edited by misher; Dec 5, 2018 at 10:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3224  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2018, 11:28 PM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by misher View Post
Isn't a bike and pedestrian walkway a requirement on new infrastructure projects?

Think of it this way, worst case motorbikes can take it



Similar to the bike crossing/spider sanctuary under the skytrain bridge from Richmond to Marine Drive that no one knows about (yes you can walk or motorbike from the casino to marine drive!). There's more than 50000 giant spiders on it (above and between all the railings so its like a cave of spiderwebs) so everyone's too scared to use it now.

They should turn the spiders into an attraction in and of by itself.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3225  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2018, 12:13 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 10,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
They should never have removed the tolls; it was the only thing preventing induced-demand from taking over on the bridge crossings.
I strongly disagree.

The NDP made the right choice in cancelling the tolls as they were patently unfair to people South of Fraser. The PM replacement and entire HYW#1 upgrade was one single budget but it was people SoF who were having to foot the entire bill. People from Van/Burn/NW/Tri City/MR/PM/NV all get to drive on a nice new highway free and gratis while people SoF paid for their luxury.

I understand the idea of induced demand but curbing by getting one part of the region to pay for all of it is incredibly unfair. A fair proposal would have been to toll the entire highway via distance travelled no matter what area you drive in or just a flat fare of, for example, $1 every time you get onto the road. This is the problem with the GM replacement...…….someone driving from Ladner to Steveston Road will pay thru the teeth but someone going from Steveston Road to Whistler gets a free ride. Such arbitrary tolling points also make a mockery of the idea of trying to live near where you work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3226  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2018, 3:41 AM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
I strongly disagree.

The NDP made the right choice in cancelling the tolls as they were patently unfair to people South of Fraser. The PM replacement and entire HYW#1 upgrade was one single budget but it was people SoF who were having to foot the entire bill. People from Van/Burn/NW/Tri City/MR/PM/NV all get to drive on a nice new highway free and gratis while people SoF paid for their luxury.

I understand the idea of induced demand but curbing by getting one part of the region to pay for all of it is incredibly unfair. A fair proposal would have been to toll the entire highway via distance travelled no matter what area you drive in or just a flat fare of, for example, $1 every time you get onto the road. This is the problem with the GM replacement...…….someone driving from Ladner to Steveston Road will pay thru the teeth but someone going from Steveston Road to Whistler gets a free ride. Such arbitrary tolling points also make a mockery of the idea of trying to live near where you work.
First, everyone paid the taxes to get the project built.

2nd, You couldn't do that, because you would have to quintuple the number of toll cameras to make it viable...

I agree that ideally, you should toll most of the major crossings in the Valley (with the exception of the False Creek Bridges, and Pitt R. Bridge (since the cost was already held by the government), and maybe the North Arm/YVR bridges, as all but the Lions Gate and Alex Fraser were slated for eventual replacement within the near future due to one reason or another.


But it also wasn't really entirely fair for someone in Prince George to pay taxes to pay for a bridge in Metro Vancouver (remember, the Port Mann never really made a profit due to high debts). That's the agreement we have when the Province controls the highway system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3227  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2018, 5:33 AM
shreddog shreddog is offline
Beer me Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Taking a Pis fer all of ya
Posts: 5,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by misher View Post
... that no one knows about ...
Not sure when that photo was taken, but I ride that bridge twice a day and it's always "busy", in that there is always traffic in front of me and going the opposite direction. It seems like some people do know about it.

Truthfully, I have seen more cyclists on it than I have on the Cambie bike lanes - but it may the time of day when I'm riding.
__________________
Leaving a Pis fer all of ya!

Do something about your future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3228  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2018, 5:36 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,837
I use to jog over it 4 or 5 times a week before I left for Japan. Wonderful piece of infrastructure and definitely known by those who live in the area.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3229  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2018, 5:38 AM
misher's Avatar
misher misher is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by shreddog View Post
Not sure when that photo was taken, but I ride that bridge twice a day and it's always "busy", in that there is always traffic in front of me and going the opposite direction. It seems like some people do know about it.

Truthfully, I have seen more cyclists on it than I have on the Cambie bike lanes - but it may the time of day when I'm riding.
You agree with the spider sanctuary part?

I see maybe one person every 20 minutes last year and 0 this year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3230  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2018, 6:37 AM
shreddog shreddog is offline
Beer me Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Taking a Pis fer all of ya
Posts: 5,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by misher View Post
You agree with the spider sanctuary part?
Not really sure what your mean? Not sure I have ever seen a spider on the bridge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by misher View Post
I see maybe one person every 20 minutes last year and 0 this year.
I live by the VGH and work in Richmond. Ride across this bridge twice a day. Today there was about 4 bikes ahead of me on the ride home (north) that i passed (and more ahead of me that I didn't catch up to before the switchbacks). Must have seen about about 20+ bikes heading south.

This was around 5PM - 5 Dec.
__________________
Leaving a Pis fer all of ya!

Do something about your future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3231  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2018, 3:47 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,693
I used to cycle-commute over that bridge. It's great, and was always well used by cyclists and morning walkers.

Great piece of safe crossing. The Knight st and Oak st bridges are awful for pedestrians and cyclists.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3232  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2018, 10:50 PM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 10,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
First, everyone paid the taxes to get the project built.

2nd, You couldn't do that, because you would have to quintuple the number of toll cameras to make it viable...

I agree that ideally, you should toll most of the major crossings in the Valley (with the exception of the False Creek Bridges, and Pitt R. Bridge (since the cost was already held by the government), and maybe the North Arm/YVR bridges, as all but the Lions Gate and Alex Fraser were slated for eventual replacement within the near future due to one reason or another.


But it also wasn't really entirely fair for someone in Prince George to pay taxes to pay for a bridge in Metro Vancouver (remember, the Port Mann never really made a profit due to high debts). That's the agreement we have when the Province controls the highway system.
If the project was being paid for by all taxpayers of the province then why were there tolls at all? Remember this was not a `new` bridge or highway but simply an upgrading of one that should have been done 30 years ago. As far as the cameras, all they had to do was just put cameras at one exit/entry ramp for a set small fee and then everyone would pay their fair share.

This is why any new GM should not be directly tolled. This is an already existing piece of infrastructure so people have chosen the area they live and work in based upon that. This tunnel and the entire HWY 99 has basically not be upgraded since it was built in the 1960s which is ridiculous. Vancouver is already obscenely expensive and not just in real estate/housing and to add to that only makes it even more so. People are not a bottomless pit. The new Sea to Sky was built free and gratis but of course that is because it caters to the wealthy who go to Whistler for the weekend and we can`t have tolls on a road used by well off as they voted Liberal.

In Ontario some new roads around Toronto are tolled but they are new roads but the 401 which is currently being 10 laned thru to Kitchener won`t be because it is an already existing route. BC has always had this stupid idea that building more transit and letting the highways rot will somehow suffice which of course it doesn`t. Vancouver commute times are amongst the highest in NA despite only being the 25th largest metro which shows just how poorly that scheme has worked.

Vancouver thinks that great cities have great transit which is patently false as truly great cities have great transportation systems in all it`s forms because they don`t and cannot function to their potential in isolation. Transportation is a system and like all functioning systems, one size doesn`t fit all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3233  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2018, 12:06 AM
bloomtronzero bloomtronzero is offline
Mrs. Joyce Collingwood
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Vancouver-ish
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by tovan View Post
When transit demand is there and vehicle trips decline or plateaus in the future, the lanes could be reconfigured to allow for rapid bus/transit:
- 3 NB
- 2 rapid bus/transit
- 3 SB
I reaaaaaally wish they did this with the new Port Mann.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3234  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2018, 8:40 AM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloomtronzero View Post
I reaaaaaally wish they did this with the new Port Mann.
We had HOVs.

I would guess the ones on the George Massey would be HOVs as well, the Bus lanes are partially solely bus lanes due to being built narrow.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
If the project was being paid for by all taxpayers of the province then why were there tolls at all? Remember this was not a `new` bridge or highway but simply an upgrading of one that should have been done 30 years ago. As far as the cameras, all they had to do was just put cameras at one exit/entry ramp for a set small fee and then everyone would pay their fair share.

This is why any new GM should not be directly tolled. This is an already existing piece of infrastructure so people have chosen the area they live and work in based upon that. This tunnel and the entire HWY 99 has basically not be upgraded since it was built in the 1960s which is ridiculous. Vancouver is already obscenely expensive and not just in real estate/housing and to add to that only makes it even more so. People are not a bottomless pit. The new Sea to Sky was built free and gratis but of course that is because it caters to the wealthy who go to Whistler for the weekend and we can`t have tolls on a road used by well off as they voted Liberal.

In Ontario some new roads around Toronto are tolled but they are new roads but the 401 which is currently being 10 laned thru to Kitchener won`t be because it is an already existing route. BC has always had this stupid idea that building more transit and letting the highways rot will somehow suffice which of course it doesn`t. Vancouver commute times are amongst the highest in NA despite only being the 25th largest metro which shows just how poorly that scheme has worked.

Vancouver thinks that great cities have great transit which is patently false as truly great cities have great transportation systems in all it`s forms because they don`t and cannot function to their potential in isolation. Transportation is a system and like all functioning systems, one size doesn`t fit all.

Vancouver can't fit much more highways beyond the currently planned expansions without expensive tunneling infrastructure, other than maybe the proposed Serpentine Highway (alternate route to the SFPR, but could be useful to supplant Hwy 10). Maximum lane width for Hwy 1 in North Vancouver is 6 lanes, which ultimately limits the Hwy 1 width overall- otherwise, Upper Levels would turn into a parking lot.

Road demand has to be controlled to avoid mass congestion.


But probably just as importantly, the tolls were needed to justify the expense, instead of the province just taking on more debt at a time when the Liberals were trying to balance the budget.

The tolls ended up only mitigating the costs of the Port Mann bridge, and constantly ran at a deficit due to debt payments; in the end, it was financed partially by provincial taxes, partially by tolls.

Without tolls, the province has to take on all the debt of the project, and there's no near-term way to actually pay it back. Justifying these sorts of massive capital projects becomes even more an uphill battle.

Also, you want this on every entry lane from McGill to 216th? There are 20 exits, including HOV exits. Multiply that by the total number of entry lanes per exit.



Honestly, that logic could be extended to so many things. It's not 'fair' that you are paying welfare checks to people on the opposite side of the province, nor is it fair that you pay for new transit expansions on the opposite side of the regions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3235  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2018, 1:50 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 10,737
So don`t up 20 cameras but instead let everyone SoF pay for it? This easy stuff............just ha ve cameras at entry points and add it to their yearly insurance which gets rid of middle man and the bureaucracy.


Anyway except for Golden Ears which was a new piece of insfrastructure, there should be no tollsas these are just upgrades of things that should have been done decades ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3236  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2018, 6:35 AM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
So don`t up 20 cameras but instead let everyone SoF pay for it? This easy stuff............just ha ve cameras at entry points and add it to their yearly insurance which gets rid of middle man and the bureaucracy.


Anyway except for Golden Ears which was a new piece of insfrastructure, there should be no tollsas these are just upgrades of things that should have been done decades ago.
And how did we justify spending the money to make these things?


And the bureaucracy and cameras are not removed because you moved the cameras and payment to a different location. They're still there, just more spread out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3237  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 12:02 AM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by shreddog View Post
Not sure when that photo was taken, but I ride that bridge twice a day and it's always "busy", in that there is always traffic in front of me and going the opposite direction. It seems like some people do know about it.

Truthfully, I have seen more cyclists on it than I have on the Cambie bike lanes - but it may the time of day when I'm riding.
Agreed. I don't see any cars in that shot either... therefore I guess no one drives over it either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3238  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 4:25 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
Agreed. I don't see any cars in that shot either... therefore I guess no one drives over it either.
They don't. It's a SkyTrain bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3239  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 5:21 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
They don't. It's a SkyTrain bridge.
Are you sure? Usually when I look at that bridge I don't see any Skytrains on it. Such is the logic of judging based on a single observation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3240  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 5:27 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Can we please stay on topic?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:12 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.