HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2001  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2013, 3:08 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico Rommheim View Post
And if it isn't, it is at worst tied with the commie block boom of the 70's.
Sadly it's less aesthetically pleasing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2002  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2013, 8:04 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,047
Courtesy of CtlAltDel showing Calgary's new 1st, 3rd and 11th tallest:


Hard to believe that the proposed 571 ft Brookfield Place West won't even make the top 10. City Centre I (558 ft) is u/c and 3 Eau Claire is due to break ground this fall. Calgary will likely have 19 buildings over 500 ft within 3 years, 22 if Brookfield West, King's on Fifth and City Centre II go ahead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2003  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2013, 10:26 PM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,688
Time for Calgary to start breaching that 900ft and 1000ft barrier. Quite a few buildings in the range from 690ft and 810ft. But pretty great that 4 of our top 5 tallest will all have been completed between 2012 and 2017.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2004  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2013, 10:47 PM
travis3000's Avatar
travis3000 travis3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Simcoe County, ON
Posts: 6,247
^ In time I think Calgary will build a 900ft building. So far they are doing incredible! And considering Toronto hasn't even broke the 1000ft barrier (not including CN Tower and antennas), it might even be longer before either Calgary or Toronto actually gets a 1000ft+ tower. I am all for it, Canada needs its first super tall. And that render looks sweet!! I would like to see a complete render of Calgary showing the new Brookfield Place towers, as well as Telus Tower and Kings On Fifth. To give a complete idea of what Calgary will look like come 2018.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2005  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 5:04 AM
vegeta_skyline vegeta_skyline is offline
Registered User, Maybe
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Windsor
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooster View Post
Time for Calgary to start breaching that 900ft and 1000ft barrier. Quite a few buildings in the range from 690ft and 810ft. But pretty great that 4 of our top 5 tallest will all have been completed between 2012 and 2017.
Not that Calgary isn't deserving of a building over 1000ft, but we here in Toronto have been waiting a heck of a long time for one with 13 built & u/c buildings above 690ft and 18 over 200m without a single supertall.
In the entire world, only Singapore(23 & 29) and Tokyo(14 & 23) have more 690ft & 200m tall buildings without having a supertall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2006  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 5:14 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is online now
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,002
Well, maybe a supertall is not in the cards for Toronto. For sure the economics are better in Calgary (energy vs financial services) and possibly the zoning too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2007  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 5:41 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
Wooster: I never thought you were one for the 900-1000 footers! Good to have you on board.... LOL Just my thoughts while we're on the subject, it really wouldn't take much for Brookfield to add some height to 225 6th, at least get close to 900'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2008  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 12:56 PM
travis3000's Avatar
travis3000 travis3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Simcoe County, ON
Posts: 6,247
If Toronto is going to get a 1000ft+ building it will not be from a commercial tower... it will be either a mixed use commercial/residential, or fully residential. And I bet we will see the first one approved in the next 5 years.

Calgary on the other hand would probably get one that is solely commercial. It would be great if someone did, and to be honest it would either be TO or Calg. I can't see it happening anywhere else in Canada.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2009  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 1:56 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,170
Oxford Place is the only legitimate chance, and our only chance at a supertall. The good news is that there are two towers, the bad news is it will take a very long time to move through the approval, demolition and construction process. And there is always a chance of a let down at the very end, a la Trump with respect to a downgrade bump to below supertall status, just before construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2010  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 2:00 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
I'm sure we can all agree on the sentiment that it is a VERY good thing that Trump did not become Canada's first supertall.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2011  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 3:06 PM
travis3000's Avatar
travis3000 travis3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Simcoe County, ON
Posts: 6,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
Oxford Place is the only legitimate chance, and our only chance at a supertall. The good news is that there are two towers, the bad news is it will take a very long time to move through the approval, demolition and construction process. And there is always a chance of a let down at the very end, a la Trump with respect to a downgrade bump to below supertall status, just before construction.
I don't think Oxford Place is our only chance at all. Other plans can happen so fast. For all you know, we could have a new proposal this fall and it could be under construction within two years. You never know how things pan out. Even a small change with the 1 Yonge proposal, 2 Bloor, Mirvish buildings, and BOOM there's a supertall. One thing I'm certain of, it will probably happen when we least expect it and come from somewhere nobody would ever guess.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2012  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 4:02 PM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis3000 View Post
I don't think Oxford Place is our only chance at all. Other plans can happen so fast. For all you know, we could have a new proposal this fall and it could be under construction within two years. You never know how things pan out. Even a small change with the 1 Yonge proposal, 2 Bloor, Mirvish buildings, and BOOM there's a supertall. One thing I'm certain of, it will probably happen when we least expect it and come from somewhere nobody would ever guess.
I agree. Toronto will see more proposals. A supertall will come, eventually. But to be honest, I would be fine if the city never saw a supertall if it meant that the city's current pace of skyscraper construction was sustainable.

Aside from what we're seeing in the sky...at the street level, the city is lagging behind on streetscape improvements and the creation of green space adequate to service this ever-more plentiful population.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2013  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 4:09 PM
mistercorporate's Avatar
mistercorporate mistercorporate is offline
The Fruit of Discipline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis3000 View Post
I don't think Oxford Place is our only chance at all. Other plans can happen so fast. For all you know, we could have a new proposal this fall and it could be under construction within two years. You never know how things pan out. Even a small change with the 1 Yonge proposal, 2 Bloor, Mirvish buildings, and BOOM there's a supertall. One thing I'm certain of, it will probably happen when we least expect it and come from somewhere nobody would ever guess.
Exactly, let's not forget that all the projects above were proposed within the last 1 year Toronto will probably have a couple supertalls either under construction or completed within 10 years, whether its Oxford Place or something else.
__________________
MLS: Toronto FC
Canadian Premier League: York 9 FC
NBA: Raptors
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2014  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 4:16 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is online now
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,002
True, who know what the future holds but we can make calculated guess. Any supertall would likely be outside of the traditional core. Most of the sites that would allow a supertall in the CBD are heavily built out. I think we should expect One Yonge's proposal to be drastically reduced in density (which likely will equate to height) when the re-zoning is all said and done. It's an absolutely incredible amount what Pinnacle has proposed. The Mirvish towers have such little chance of being built that I'm not sure why they are even discussed as more than someone's vision. On top of that, the towers are grossly oversized and lack sufficient parking to gain approval as they currently stand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2015  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 4:20 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,170
I think the city is needy in terms of cash for transit, and this density although great actually reduces the need for additional expensive suburban transit maintenance and expansion. I see One Yonge going ahead with only slight modifications and major condo cash from Pinnacle to the city to offset the greater density proposed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2016  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 4:24 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,409
I think the absolute perfect site for a supertall would be the site of the World's Biggest Bookstore and the adjacent properties fronting on to Yonge just north of Dundas. It's on the subway, near Yonge-Dundas Square, not in the way of any important sightlines, and there's nothing nearby to shadow. From a skyline perspective, it wouldn't compete with the CN Tower, and probably wouldn't even be visible from the lake. I'm hoping for something massive there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2017  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 4:40 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is online now
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,002
Nevermind transit. The utilities operating in Toronto are currently in need of a billion dollar just to prevent the systems from breaking down. A project of Pinnacle size duplicated several times over would only exacerbate that need. I hope the city looks above of simply landing a wad of cash. The density proposed is ridiculous and goes against the countless dollars and hours spent to design a livable city. The suggestion that a reduction in density to something more reasonable equates to increased suburban transit funding is mind boggling to say the least.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2018  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 5:18 PM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
Going to be a long time, if ever, Calgary would ever get a 1000 footer built. Toronto will be the first.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2019  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 5:29 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,702
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 000 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 550 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 878 000
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2020  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2013, 5:45 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,597
hey hey hey! I think they have the copper roof scheduled to be replaced in 2112, so you better make sure it is brown!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:31 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.