Quote:
Originally Posted by StethJeff
Hates:
New ______
San/St./Santa/São ______
_______ City
_______apolis
_______ville
_______burg
_______grad
New York City fails on multiple grounds. And Minneapolis/St. Paul is the dreaded double whammy of successive failures.
Names should be unique, nonconformist, aesthetically pleasing, not too short or worse yet monosyllabic (Berne, Bonn). I'd say they shouldn't be too long either but frankly some of the longer polysyllabic city names sound the most elegant (Rio de Janeiro, Los Angeles, Buenos Aires, Dar es Salaam, Cartagena)
|
I hate those too, especially apolis and burg. I don't mind San and São though, they sound better than Los. New is just painfully lazy, like you couldn't be bothered to come up with a unique name for a place that you're going to create your whole life in?
I'm not sure longer names are always better, it's very hit or miss (Philadelphia is an absolutely horrid name and its nickname is even worse IMO). Rio de Janeiro can get away with it's long name since it's easily shortened to "Rio" which sounds good and is easily recognizable.