TORONTO | 401-415 King Street W | 187 M / 615 FT | 55 FLOORS

Tony · #1 Posted **Feb 11, 2011, 2:40 PM**

Currently occupied by a 1-storey LCBO (constructed & approved in 2009 with an agreement with the City that a proposal for a substantially more intense use would follow in the future). LCBO will be a tenant in the new building. The subject property also contains a heritage-listed building (which appears to be a part of the facade for the new structure).

King-spadina - RENDERING BY CORE ARCHITECTS

The City's Preliminary Report will be presented at the Feb 16, 2011 Toronto East York Community Council meeting. More details to come...

caltrane74 · #2 Posted **Feb 13, 2011, 12:52 AM**

King West is just getting more and more chic. Awesome project, and no doubt a perfect fit with the 'hood that is developing here.

Tony · #3 Posted **Feb 22, 2011, 6:23 PM**

Source: http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2...file-35427.pdf

39 Storeys, 443 residential units.
126.5 metres (excl. mechanical), 131.5 metres (overall).

Zoning Amendment was adopted at the Feb 16 Community Council Meeting.

caltrane74 · #4 Posted **Apr 4, 2011, 5:24 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpadinaBus

Here it is from the website as a teaser. They are still showing the magic solar powered balconies/glass glazing.

More renders

caltrane74 · #5 Posted **Apr 20, 2011, 1:23 PM**

http://www.urbandb.com/document/toro...2011-01-27.pdf

Staff report for 401-415 King West..

caltrane74 · #6 Posted **Mar 18, 2012, 9:37 PM**

Current site by me

Dylan Leblanc · #7 Posted **Mar 18, 2012, 9:39 PM**

That building doesn't even look very old.

caltrane74 · #8 Posted **Mar 18, 2012, 10:00 PM**

It was built 2 or 3 years ago.

caltrane74 · #9 Posted **Apr 13, 2012, 4:34 PM**

updated rendering

from buzzbuzzhome.com

yaletown_fella · #10 Posted **Apr 13, 2012, 7:19 PM**

NOoooooooo!!! The old rendering was far superior.
Hate the mixmashed windows and staggered balconies.

Travis007 · #11 Posted **Apr 14, 2012, 12:34 AM**

Beautiful, much improved design. This project is still very preliminary but will be worth the wait in the end.

yaletown_fella · #12 Posted **Apr 14, 2012, 1:30 AM**

The new design changes are pure mindlessness. Random appropriation of popular "modern" styles.

Innsertnamehere · #13 Posted **Apr 14, 2012, 2:03 AM**

I like how they managed to make the 2 towers feel like 2 different towers, but yet still distinctly part of the same building, through the mixing of the 2 facade treatments on the large base. if curtainwall is used on the taller tower (unlikely) this could turn out to be quite nice.

yaletown_fella · #14 Posted **Apr 14, 2012, 4:21 PM**

The older design had a superior vernacular program. The proportions complimented the surrounding warehouse buildings in the 'nabe.

Although I do prefer the twin tower massing plan of the new design.

I admit that I'd probably like the new design more if I didn't see the old render in the first place.

isaidso · #15 Posted **Apr 14, 2012, 7:40 PM**

The mid-rise on the corner is much better than that boring glass tower to its east.

cruzin4u · #16 Posted **Aug 20, 2013, 5:41 PM**

Address: 401-415 King Street W.
Developer: Terracap Group
Architect: CORE Architects

This development is in the middle of the buildings in the photo.

DrNest · #17 Posted **Aug 20, 2013, 6:36 PM**

Like I said on the thread for the proposal next door. Welcome density filler.

yaletown_fella · #18 Posted **Aug 21, 2013, 1:06 PM**

While I think theres too much modern design going up in the city (would prefer a few more traditional/po-mo designs to add diversity) I find the setbacks of both these buildings to be ideal. The materials on the podium could look sharp if executed right. As DrNest said can't go wrong with this awesome density. Great stuff.

Urbannizer · #19 Posted **Sep 16, 2015, 7:57 PM**

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...postcount=2380

Quote:

Originally Posted by Automation Gallery

401-415 King West (@ Spadina, Terracap/Tridel, 55s, Teeple)

187.38 metres/615 feet, 55 storeys plus mechanical penthouse.

Gresto · #20 Posted **Sep 17, 2015, 8:14 PM**

Thanks for posting, Urbannizer. I can't reconcile this latest iteration with the original rendering (short and squat) and the original height of 615 ft and 65 storeys.