Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr
It pretty much does. Three stick-built projects are the only things that you see within the Union Station neighborhood. One is an affordable housing project (it's debatable why this is even being put up). Another is a grocery store that required DURA funding, another equity partner, and a hell of a lot of time to make it work. The final one was the lifeline project that kept the company that owns all of the land behind Union Station alive- cashflow is what brought the project to fruition.
I guess what I'm saying is that I understand why certain projects behind Union Station are stick-builds: asinine affordable housing, subsidized retail, and a cash-flow crunch project. I'm not saying that these projects are the best use of the land that they occupy- asides from 20th & Chestnut since that provides an actual grocery store DT (something that CC will soon be lacking), but I understand why they are stick built.
|
This is a good point. I never thought about CityHouse serving as a cash-flow mechanism for the master development, but that makes perfect sense. And honestly, I'd rather they build the whole thing out quickly anyway so that Denver can move on to worrying about other neighborhoods. Having not just one neighborhood like this, but several, is what will ultimately make it a really great city. The stick-build sites can always be revisited in several decades.
There are bad buildings in the heart of almost any great urban neighborhood. They don't detract from the neighborhoods themselves, if you ask me, but serve as long-term redevelopment opportunities. Mixing a few 2040s era buildings (or later, who knows) into the 2010s era buildings might not be the worst thing in the world. I would rather have a stick build that provides home to hundreds of people in the meantime than a parking lot.