HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6421  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2018, 9:12 PM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...osts-1.4940561

So is this thing going to Langley or not? Why can't there ever be a clear answer from these dumb politicians? Doug said he can get this built with the current 1.65 billion LRT budget. So who's lying?
Doug; there's not enough money in the Translink-proposed budget yet even if you removed all of the 25% margin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6422  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2018, 9:14 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...osts-1.4940561

So is this thing going to Langley or not? Why can't there ever be a clear answer from these dumb politicians? Doug said he can get this built with the current 1.65 billion LRT budget. So who's lying?
Doug is. I don't understand why people are willing to believe a mayor whose last transit experience was 15 years ago over a regional authority whose job it is to plan out and budget projects like this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6423  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2018, 9:32 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by flipper316 View Post
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...osts-1.4940561

So is this thing going to Langley or not? Why can't there ever be a clear answer from these dumb politicians? Doug said he can get this built with the current 1.65 billion LRT budget. So who's lying?
The answer is always Doug.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6424  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2018, 10:03 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,657
Fleetwood gets SkyTrain because... it's currently a smaller employment centre than Newton or Gilford, currently, and in the OCP is slated for less growth than either with little multi residential zoning, but in any case... all three town centres have a max FSR of 2.5. At least Gilford has a mall and rec centre along with Newton.

The OCP (2013) with this rail line is severely out of date. With Fleetwood and Langly needing we area and community plans / zoning to justify more rapid transit than B-Lines which they'll get soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6425  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2018, 11:26 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Fleetwood gets SkyTrain because... it's currently a smaller employment centre than Newton or Gilford, currently, and in the OCP is slated for less growth than either with little multi residential zoning, but in any case... all three town centres have a max FSR of 2.5. At least Gilford has a mall and rec centre along with Newton.

The OCP (2013) with this rail line is severely out of date. With Fleetwood and Langly needing we area and community plans / zoning to justify more rapid transit than B-Lines which they'll get soon.
1. The ship has sailed, there's going to be SkyTrain down Fraser Highway towards Langley. How far it goes and when depends on funding, but it'll go to at least Fleetwood in the first phase.
2. Reprioritizing community plans definitely needs to be in the works for Fleetwood, Clayton, and Langley City to take advantage of the new SkyTrain line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6426  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2018, 12:58 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
1. The ship has sailed, there's going to be SkyTrain down Fraser Highway towards Langley. How far it goes and when depends on funding, but it'll go to at least Fleetwood in the first phase.
2. Reprioritizing community plans definitely needs to be in the works for Fleetwood, Clayton, and Langley City to take advantage of the new SkyTrain line.
The Burnaby / New West area plans are scheduled for 2019 - 2020. SoF is next in line after that, so I'm guessing around 2022 they'll start it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6427  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2018, 6:38 AM
BirchTrain BirchTrain is offline
Eat the sun
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
The same SFU Gondola that said Council spent the better part of the decade rejecting? Those are some wrecking ball-sized testicles; they should consider loaning them out to construction companies.
The hypocrisy is real. The writer doesn’t seem to care about other municipalities, just if they have good transit, all is done. Second rate system for Surrey? Sure, as long as their taxes don’t go up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6428  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2018, 6:39 AM
BirchTrain BirchTrain is offline
Eat the sun
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
2. Reprioritizing community plans definitely needs to be in the works for Fleetwood, Clayton, and Langley City to take advantage of the new SkyTrain line.
Definitely should happen. Fraser Highway is gonna be lit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6429  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2018, 7:11 AM
fredinno's Avatar
fredinno fredinno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Fleetwood gets SkyTrain because... it's currently a smaller employment centre than Newton or Gilford, currently, and in the OCP is slated for less growth than either with little multi residential zoning, but in any case... all three town centres have a max FSR of 2.5. At least Gilford has a mall and rec centre along with Newton.

The OCP (2013) with this rail line is severely out of date. With Fleetwood and Langly needing we area and community plans / zoning to justify more rapid transit than B-Lines which they'll get soon.
It's because we decided to go with LRT on the L-line, and had partially completed preliminary planning for the Fraser Hwy 'Phase 2' Skytrain.

Instead of spending time going back to the drawing board, and redesigning everything, this is probably the fastest way to get the SOF transit expansion going.

Also, Doug.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6430  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2018, 9:29 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredinno View Post
It's because we decided to go with LRT on the L-line, and had partially completed preliminary planning for the Fraser Hwy 'Phase 2' Skytrain.

Instead of spending time going back to the drawing board, and redesigning everything, this is probably the fastest way to get the SOF transit expansion going.

Also, Doug.
The engineering design contract is going back out to tender, so things might take a bit to get ironed out administratively.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6431  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 3:46 AM
Monolith's Avatar
Monolith Monolith is offline
Ocean Breeze
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southwestern British Columbia
Posts: 1,202
Premier says no additional money for Surrey SkyTrain

https://vancouversun.com/news/politi...urrey-skytrain
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6432  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 4:22 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,303
Surrey–Langley Line (includes pdf links in the original)

Quote:
Surrey and Langley are among the fastest-growing communities in the Lower Mainland. Over the next 30 years, the City of Surrey, City of Langley, and Township of Langley are expected to welcome more than 400,000 new residents and create 185,000 additional jobs. That’s why improving rapid transit in the South of Fraser area is a regional priority.

In June 2014, the Metro Vancouver Mayors' Council on Regional Transportation shared a 10-year transportation Vision outlining transit and transportation priorities to keep Metro Vancouver moving.

Building on previous phases of planning and consultation, TransLink is now creating a work plan to determine how to move forward with planning, consultation and design work for rapid transit connecting Surrey and Langley.

According to a 2017 Preliminary Cost Estimates Report the budget estimate for this Project is $1.95B for LRT and $2.91B for SkyTrain. Further technical work to refine the design and scope of this project is funded as part of the Phase Two Investment Plan. A project budget will be confirmed in the future once a business case has been approved and procurement is complete.

If you want to learn more, details on what work has been done to date can be found in the Key Findings Infographic, Alternatives Evaluation Executive Summary, and the Hatch Preliminary Cost Estimates Report.
Those numbers are only for the Fraser Hwy line - not the L Line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6433  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 4:52 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,303
From the Hatch Preliminary Cost Estimates Report (pdf) pg 41

Quote:
The stations are 82.5 metres long, and are all elevated, as follows:

140th Street - Centre platform one entrance
152nd Street - Side platform overpass two entrances
160th Street - Side platform mezzanine two entrances
166th Street - Side platform one entrance
184th Street - Side platform one entrance
192nd Street - Side platform one entrance
196th Street - Side platform one entrance
Langley Terminus - Centre platform one entrance
Obviously this was before the proposed 148th St (the other side of Green Timbers) future station. 192nd St is where 64th Ave crosses and 196th is Willowbrook.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6434  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 7:48 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monolith View Post
Premier says no additional money for Surrey SkyTrain

https://vancouversun.com/news/politi...urrey-skytrain
Looks like we're stopping at Fleetwood for now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6435  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 8:47 AM
Firebrand's Avatar
Firebrand Firebrand is offline
D-Class Suburbanite
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monolith View Post
Premier says no additional money for Surrey SkyTrain

https://vancouversun.com/news/politi...urrey-skytrain
Welp, I'm fucked. With this political meddling regarding money, I'll be 30 and be driving my own car to work by the time it ends to Langley.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6436  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 9:53 AM
xd_1771's Avatar
xd_1771 xd_1771 is offline
(daka_x)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monolith View Post
Premier says no additional money for Surrey SkyTrain

https://vancouversun.com/news/politi...urrey-skytrain
Yeah I think he might need to consider how bone-headed of a comment this is.

If there's "no money" beyond $1.65B for Surrey rapid transit, then does that not mean the province was NEVER going to fund its share of the $1.9B that would've eventually been needed for a Surrey-Langley LRT?

This seems like a good opportunity for the opposition to further drum up ideas that Horgan and the NDP are ignoring Surrey's needs... I'm honestly considering going right up to them and just suggesting it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6437  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 4:13 PM
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 21,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monolith View Post
Premier says no additional money for Surrey SkyTrain

https://vancouversun.com/news/politi...urrey-skytrain
Reads more like "FU Doug, you don't tell us what to do" rather than any specific denial of more transit dollars.

Skytrain all the way to Langley will just be a part of the Phase 3 mayor's plan, which Trudeau could easily commit to as a part of his re-election campaign. I'm not sure how many Federal Liberal runnings are viable in that area. Same for Horgan on his next election in 2021.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6438  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 7:12 PM
BirchTrain BirchTrain is offline
Eat the sun
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monolith View Post
Premier says no additional money for Surrey SkyTrain

https://vancouversun.com/news/politi...urrey-skytrain
The Mayor's Council promised $3.5 billion for rapid transit south of Fraser, which was comprised of the SNG LRT and the Fraser Highway LRT. The RRT1A proposal (SkyTrain on Fraser, BRT on SNG corridor) should be able to fit into that budget, given BRT is much cheaper than LRT, which would offset the cost of RRT on Fraser Highway all the way to Langley. Even if the first phase ends in Fleetwood or Clayton, the additional money should be able to get the line all the way to Langley, and maybe extend the BRT to White Rock and Coquitlam.

They may currently have $1.6 billion for the SoF rapid transit portion of the 10 Year Plan. But they will eventually have to push for funding for the other $1.9 billion from all levels of government. It originally would've been for the Surrey-Langley LRT, but now since the switch to SkyTrain, it would fund the second phase of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6439  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 7:15 PM
Kisai Kisai is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by xd_1771 View Post
Yeah I think he might need to consider how bone-headed of a comment this is.

If there's "no money" beyond $1.65B for Surrey rapid transit, then does that not mean the province was NEVER going to fund its share of the $1.9B that would've eventually been needed for a Surrey-Langley LRT?

This seems like a good opportunity for the opposition to further drum up ideas that Horgan and the NDP are ignoring Surrey's needs... I'm honestly considering going right up to them and just suggesting it.
Live, Mayors Council: https://www.pscp.tv/w/1gqxvnDXowBxB

They're discussing the cost right now. Also "Nobody supported LRT" is a real thing.

IMO, considering how thing of margin the NDP/Green has, this really would be a way for Liberals to win votes, but not if they P3 it like they did with the Canada Line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6440  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 7:53 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kisai View Post
Live, Mayors Council: https://www.pscp.tv/w/1gqxvnDXowBxB

They're discussing the cost right now. Also "Nobody supported LRT" is a real thing.

IMO, considering how thing of margin the NDP/Green has, this really would be a way for Liberals to win votes, but not if they P3 it like they did with the Canada Line.
LOL I just started it and the first thing I hear is Doug McCallum is 'we all have to work together'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:56 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.