HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Central Park Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1281  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 3:17 AM
UTEPman UTEPman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 235
Wow. That is pretty awful. Shame it will be a centerpiece of Manhattan's skyline.

Seriously though, if you are going make a building with that much impact on one of the worlds iconic skylines you should put a little thought into aesthetics.
     
     
  #1282  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 3:22 AM
easy as pie's Avatar
easy as pie easy as pie is offline
testify
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 94109
Posts: 853
totally wrong for that part of midtown, man, that's a bummer. with any luck, there's some serious revision after a full-on public campaign against the design.
     
     
  #1283  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 3:24 AM
JayPro JayPro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,047
@Onn;
Yeah, but remember One57's architects had the task of making the structure conform to an odd-shaped lot. This one, obviously, doesn't.
I can only hope that the facade shows at least *some* intiative towards aspiring to the "iconic" status that already has been conferred upon this monolith...and perhaps too hastily.
     
     
  #1284  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 4:10 AM
patriotizzy's Avatar
patriotizzy patriotizzy is offline
Metal Up Your !
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,585
After all this hype, this is what we get? I expected something close to the sexiness of the Hudson Yards. That lot is full of architectural porn. This however, is something like trying to get off on a mutilated cow carcass
     
     
  #1285  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 5:06 AM
mistermetAJ mistermetAJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onn View Post
Trump Tower is awesome (best US skyscraper of the last decade), and is so Burj Khalifa. There might be more creative designs out there (and certainly safer, they could have gone with Peli AGAIN), but not many as instant classics.
Trump Tower is awful. No texture, all glass, and no creativity. Pretty bland with the exception of the set backs.

However, Trump Tower is miles and miles better than this mess proposed by Adrian Smith. This thing is beyond offensive to the skyline. Its an atrocity. It is completely out of context with its surroundings in form. Yet its break away from conformity doesnt even have a hint of creativity, but is merely a box stacked awkwardly on a box.

New York would be better off if this thing wasnt built. How incredibly disappointing. Is there anything that can stop this monstrosity?

New York needs to implement design review boards. Based on its size and prominence in the skyline, this is wosre than any street wall killing budget hotel designed by Kaufman.

Why Adrian Smith did you have to ruin New York?
     
     
  #1286  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 5:14 AM
King DenCity's Avatar
King DenCity King DenCity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: With Your Pancakes :|
Posts: 507
^So true we need a new supertall tower to hope for.
__________________
Pancakes are as they should be and that is life.
Let the man made forests rule!
     
     
  #1287  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 5:24 AM
mistermetAJ mistermetAJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onn View Post
One57 wasn't a stunner at first either (with poor renderings) but the finished product turned out way better than expected. I think they will pull it off successfully. If people are disappointed with the design from a creative standpoint that's fair to say, yet that doesn't mean they won't like the finished product. Yeah it's a mixed bag right now.
One 57 had acceptable massing. We were all worried about the skin.

This "mixed bag" of garbage doesnt even have that, and you can look at any Adrian Smith design to know its going to be flat, probably blue glass devoid of detail.

He is a horrible architect. Such a disappointment for the city.
     
     
  #1288  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 7:14 AM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
Guys calm down you havnt seen the entire structure yet it's not perfect but not terrible either
__________________
New York City,The City That Never Sleeps,The Capitol Of The World,The Big Apple,The Empire City,The Melting Pot,The Metropolis,Gotham

Buildings Over 200 Meters 62 Completed 20 Under Construction 50 Proposed 0 On Hold
     
     
  #1289  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 7:21 AM
babybackribs2314 babybackribs2314 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UWS, Manhattan
Posts: 1,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyscrapersOfNewYork View Post
Guys calm down you havnt seen the entire structure yet it's not perfect but not terrible either
Strongly disagree!

Were you standing behind the LPC table/the one that gave the pro-skyscraper statement, btw? I liked what you said - and am I incorrect in thinking the chair totally cut me off?!!
     
     
  #1290  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 7:54 AM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by babybackribs2314 View Post
Strongly disagree!

Were you standing behind the LPC table/the one that gave the pro-skyscraper statement, btw? I liked what you said - and am I incorrect in thinking the chair totally cut me off?!!
what was your statement and yup that was me... The chair was rude I might add and I couldn't handle all those dead beats who were afraid of Shadows.
__________________
New York City,The City That Never Sleeps,The Capitol Of The World,The Big Apple,The Empire City,The Melting Pot,The Metropolis,Gotham

Buildings Over 200 Meters 62 Completed 20 Under Construction 50 Proposed 0 On Hold
     
     
  #1291  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 7:54 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onn View Post



Hard to get a read when we can't see the whole building, but it doesn't look bad. I kind of like the cantilevering actually.


I look at this as the kid who didn't get exactly what he wanted for Christmas, but still got a really great gift, one that a lot of kids would love to have. That being said, I feel they had a chance to do somthing special here, and didn't. Also, I don't like the cantilever on a building this tall. The tower should soar, from the,bottom to the top, and the cantilever cuts in to that. Lose it, and the tower is better.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1292  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 8:09 AM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
Where ever the tower falls short I blame nordstrom they specifically requested that the buildings core not be in the middle of the lot to maximize Sq. Footage in the store. Place the core in the middle. Get more bulk for the tower and you get more space to build a more dynamic design... Nordstrom cheated us here let's not blame the architects.
__________________
New York City,The City That Never Sleeps,The Capitol Of The World,The Big Apple,The Empire City,The Melting Pot,The Metropolis,Gotham

Buildings Over 200 Meters 62 Completed 20 Under Construction 50 Proposed 0 On Hold
     
     
  #1293  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 8:43 AM
babybackribs2314 babybackribs2314 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UWS, Manhattan
Posts: 1,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyscrapersOfNewYork View Post
what was your statement and yup that was me... The chair was rude I might add and I couldn't handle all those dead beats who were afraid of Shadows.
I mentioned Vornado's 220 CPS & he shut me down completely after less than 30 seconds. I think I went one or two people after you.
     
     
  #1294  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 8:45 AM
babybackribs2314 babybackribs2314 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UWS, Manhattan
Posts: 1,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyscrapersOfNewYork View Post
Where ever the tower falls short I blame nordstrom they specifically requested that the buildings core not be in the middle of the lot to maximize Sq. Footage in the store. Place the core in the middle. Get more bulk for the tower and you get more space to build a more dynamic design... Nordstrom cheated us here let's not blame the architects.
The core could have easily gone where 1780 Broadway used to be; they're only keeping the facade.

The argument that it was bc of Nordstrom is totally BS, and people came up to me afterwards in agreement - they located the core there because of 220 CPS's potential to block 217 W 57th's views.
     
     
  #1295  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 10:03 AM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
Yep, quite the disappointment.

Height

1300ft? 1400ft? Meh, that ain't special anymore, not even in New York City. Barnett had a unique chance to make a bold statement. So 57th Street will be a wall of 1300 footers, great. The skyline needs a real peak and only a 1600 / 1700 footer (to the roof) can achieve that. I realize developers built only on demand and maximum profit, but this city needs to move forward, heightwise.

Design

So far, pretty lame. AS+GG surely can do better. What were they thinking? Are they in love with 432 PA and decided to mess around a bit? Pathetic. Now I'd rather have a green tower which is curvy and more interesting.

And btw thanks Nikolai for attending the meeting. Your info is very much appreciated.
     
     
  #1296  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 10:36 AM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,098
Wow, this could really hurt if later on we find out how Adrian Smith's original design or the scrapped H de M design might have looked like.

This design is just too blockish. Reminds me of some of those awkward WTC proposals that didn't get selected.

With all those people involved in this project, you'd think some of them could see how unflattering this tower looks.
     
     
  #1297  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 11:28 AM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
This is what New York needs as a signature tower!

Something like this:

Guangzhou Chow Tai Fook Center: 1739ft/530m






or this:

Shenzhen Ping An Finance Center: 2165ft/660m





Maybe someone needs to book a plane ticket for AS & GG to China so they can get some inspiration from there ... argh, I'm so angry now.
     
     
  #1298  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 11:41 AM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
For the first time ever I find myself in the position of actually preventing a NYC project to see the light of day. Never thought this would happen!
     
     
  #1299  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 11:48 AM
De Minimis NY De Minimis NY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hell's Kitchen, NY
Posts: 68
This article on curbed seems to suggest that the landmarks committee could have some say in the design. To be fair, the artlicle also misstates the new height of the building, but is there any possibility that the cantilever over the American Fine Arts society building would allow the committee to influence what will be built?

Look At Extell's Next Midtown Tower, A 1,550-Foot-Tall Doozy

1/10/2013 By Hana R. Alberts

http://ny.curbed.com/archives/2013/1...tall_doozy.php

"The glassy design cantilevers over the uber-historic American Fine Arts Society building next door, and neighbors are worried about its height and general appropriateness. They're used to Extell's 57th Stret megaprojects, of course, but this time a landmark is involved."
     
     
  #1300  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2013, 12:11 PM
yankeesfan1000 yankeesfan1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 10014
Posts: 1,617
All courtesy of Funkyskunk2 on SSC:



     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:32 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.