While I believe China is in fact a relatively safe country and I am not going to be one of those indignant westerners who suspects the government is purposely faking the stats, I do wonder if maybe China's different legal system generates different official statistics on the occurrence of crimes. Also does Chinese culture solve personal disputes with more or less involvement of the police?
It seems like it would be hard to compare different country's crime rates, especially ones that are already very safe or very dangerous. I doubt official crimes could have an accidental discrepancy large enough to greatly change one country's place in the worldwide rankings, but the relative order of the top 10 safest or bottom 10 most dangerous cities or countries could be full of errors due to small differences in how crime is measured.
For example, many European countries that are very safe are now taking a stronger stance against sexual crimes like rape and discovering that such crimes are actually more common than anyone anticipated and now they must report having more crime than they did in the past. But they did not become more dangerous, in fact they became safer. Conversely, Mexico and Latin America in general is so dangerous that I have read stories online about people finding the police completely unhelpful and unwilling to let citizens report crimes or ask for assistance. So while the country already has abysmal crime rates they are probably even worse than anyone could even imagine.
Also I think the legal rights Americans and Europeans possess may encourage the police to exaggerate offenses and the danger of confrontations, because they need to be able to legally justify searches and they need to justify a conviction. In the US people who are awaiting trial can spend a considerable time in jail despite not formally being charged with a crime yet and thus they can be pressured to accept a plea bargain. While it almost always true that the person taking the deal was in fact guilty, the actual crime they committed may not be nearly as heinous as claimed. Imagine some woman is shoplifting, and is arrested after forcing herself past a plainclothes police officer. You can guarantee the police officer will claim he was "assaulted" because she shoved him, and by shove they really mean mean she put her hand on his arm and tried to squeeze past him. That sort of thing.
Quote:
Yeah, I've always said here in Canada we waste too much taxpayer money on prisons. I think if Canada brings back the death penalty, we can get rid of the entire prison system altogether. If commit a crime, you die, simple as that. That also has the added benefit of reducing population and reducing the burden on the environment, so it can be considered a green initiative as well. Criminals are nothing more than human garbage, and garbage belongs in a landfill, and nowhere else.
|
Are you off your meds?
Honestly, I'd rather deal with petty crime, even be a victim of it, than see perfect safety achieved through some kind of "final solution".