HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2024, 11:10 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,845
By far the best option is option A. A free flow connection between highway 1 to the Pattullo Bridge and to the SFPR would actually bring some completion / true connection to our highway system.

Not expecting any free flow movements under the NDP. After they removed the free flow movements from the Pattullo Bridge project on the Surrey side and reduced the Steveston Interchange from a triple stacked with rapid bus station to essentially retaining the current design with bus on shoulder… not to mention the complete elimination of any interchange upgrades on the 99 south of the tunnel…
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2024, 11:53 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
By far the best option is option A. A free flow connection between highway 1 to the Pattullo Bridge and to the SFPR would actually bring some completion / true connection to our highway system.
That's wrong, option A would not be free flowing. There's still a light at the E Columbia Street intersection and the Cumberland Street intersection that Option C completely avoids. Not to mention the light at Richmond Street and the light for the Front Street turnoff...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2024, 12:21 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
That's wrong, option A would not be free flowing. There's still a light at the E Columbia Street intersection and the Cumberland Street intersection that Option C completely avoids. Not to mention the light at Richmond Street and the light for the Front Street turnoff...
I didn’t say that option A alone completed the free flow movement, but it is the closest to building towards that.

The interactions with highway 1 are free flow towards and from the the west.

Option C ovoids some of that but had no free flow connections with the highway.

I would actually support option C if made free flow with the highway connections.

But this entire conversation is mute anyways, since what we will likely get under this government is minimal improvements (likely retaining existing structures, or at most a 1 to 1 replacement) with a few new bike lanes. (Please note, this is not anti bike lanes, but they are likely all we are going to get for any real improvements)
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2024, 1:09 AM
rickvug rickvug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 150
I wonder if this will end up being for a much more limited scope. I'm specifically thinking about the bottleneck and safety disaster that is the intersection of East Columbia and Brunette. Tragically there was a pedestrian fatality there in February of 2023. Before this there was citizen lobbying about this specific section of sidewalk, which also happens to be a notable gap in the Central Valley Greenway. I know that the CNW views it as a priority but have been frustrated by the high cost and complexity (ie. expropriation requirements). The fatality along with the Pattullo Replacement Project may have finally pushed this work up the priority list and secured funding.

No inside info on this, just a guess based on having followed the situation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2024, 2:06 PM
Bobert Bobert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 233
Option c, and really B aswell would be nice if they had some sort of Tupper Ave on-ramp to remove the truck traffic from Brunette. Seems like a big omission to build a new overpass but still have westbound highway 1 traffic funnel into brunette
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2024, 5:26 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
-snip-
Yeah Option C could have better connections with the Highway. Any option that involves an intersection at E Columbia Street will never be free-flowing though, as there's just not enough physical space there to build an interchange without needing to demolish parts of the Brewery District or remove the CN mainline tracks.

Although I think you're correct that we're likely to see modest improvements though. This was projected in the $500 - 650M range back in 2016, placing the likely figures 8 years later at somewhere north of a billion for something similar in scope.

Will be interesting to see what options are presented and the figures associated with them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2024, 12:09 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,174
where are y'all seeing options and info? is it online or did you attend an event?
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2024, 12:10 AM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 571
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
where are y'all seeing options and info? is it online or did you attend an event?
We are referring to the 2016 options / info. Nothing for 2024 available yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2024, 12:31 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,174
ah ok.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:42 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.