HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive


    Golden Buffalo Centre Tower A in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Fort McMurray Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2014, 7:54 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
FORT MCMURRAY | Golden Buffalo | 489FT / 149M | 37 Floors

Golden Buffalo - Fort McMurray - Multi-tower (tallest 150 meters [489 feet]) - Office, Medical Centre, Hotel, Retail







Quote:
Golden Buffalo proposes a multi-tower, mixed-use development consisting of a medical facility, commercial, mixed office, and hotel space in Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada, adding approximately 863,000 sqft of finished floorspace.

The facility will be designed to the highest level of sustainable development, featuring pre-cast modular and net-zero construction techniques. Setting the precedent for commercial office and residential space throughout North America, the towers will feature reinforced and post-tensioned insulated concrete within a glass façade.

We will build a vital and dynamic place to work, play and live that will become an international icon for Fort McMurray and Wood Buffalo.




http://www.goldenbuffalo.ca/wp-conte...0722-11x17.pdf
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2014, 8:05 PM
Design-mind's Avatar
Design-mind Design-mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,653
Nice find Chadillaccc! This will be a real game changer for Ft. Mac! A lot taller than their tallest now.
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2014, 8:22 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Yeah, their current tallest is only 36 meters. I like that this project includes a shorter (hotel) tower though, so that it can at least try to blend into the current scale of the city. I also like how massive the main tower is, as it could create a new scale for the city.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2014, 10:43 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,748
Very impressive.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2014, 10:50 PM
cityguy's Avatar
cityguy cityguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Windsor
Posts: 752
A new skyline is born
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2014, 10:57 PM
geotag277 geotag277 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,091
If it was 150 metres and this gets built that would seem to mean Fort McMurray would have a taller "tallest" building than Edmonton. Something seems wrong about that.

But it's great for Fort Mac. They could really use a development like this. I think it will be a great addition to the area.
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2014, 1:12 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Edmonton will be building taller than 150 meters any time now. I wouldn't worry about that. It would be the tallest building north of Edmonton on the continent though. Actually, I think it would be the tallest in the world north of the 56th Parallel.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2014, 2:51 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 13,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Edmonton will be building taller than 150 meters any time now. I wouldn't worry about that. It would be the tallest building north of Edmonton on the continent though. Actually, I think it would be the tallest in the world north of the 56th Parallel.
Yekaterinburg has a 209m building under construction and a 184m building built. Its latitude is a few minutes north of Fort McMuray.

It is very cool for Canada anywhere to be building something significant that far north.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2014, 6:17 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeInMyShoes View Post
Yekaterinburg has a 209m building under construction and a 184m building built. Its latitude is a few minutes north of Fort McMuray.

It is very cool for Canada anywhere to be building something significant that far north.
haha dang! Totally forgot about Yekaterinburg. I only thought to check Moscow and St. Petersburgh in Russia (both below 56 latitude). Several of the Baltic and Finno-scandian states also have taller towers proposed. Nonetheless, a very cool project. I look forward to the intensification of Fort McMurray. Projections place its population at 230 000 by 2030.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2014, 8:05 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by geotag277 View Post
If it was 150 metres and this gets built that would seem to mean Fort McMurray would have a taller "tallest" building than Edmonton. Something seems wrong about that.

But it's great for Fort Mac. They could really use a development like this. I think it will be a great addition to the area.
Until recently we had a 150m maximum height due to the municipal airport overlay... but that airport has recently closed.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2014, 7:50 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
The New Republic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Provinces of America
Posts: 10,804
This looks as nice as Bay-Adelaide East Tower going up in Toronto. If this gets built it will be one of the most impressive builds this country has ever seen. 149m office tower in a city of 80,000 people?
__________________
World's First Documented Baseball Game: Beachville, Ontario, June 4th, 1838.
World's First Documented Gridiron Game: University College, Toronto, November 9th, 1861.
Hamilton Tiger-Cats since 1869 & Toronto Argonauts since 1873: North America's 2 oldest pro football teams

Last edited by isaidso; Jan 23, 2014 at 8:01 AM.
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2014, 1:54 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 13,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
haha dang! Totally forgot about Yekaterinburg. I only thought to check Moscow and St. Petersburgh in Russia (both below 56 latitude). Several of the Baltic and Finno-scandian states also have taller towers proposed. Nonetheless, a very cool project. I look forward to the intensification of Fort McMurray. Projections place its population at 230 000 by 2030.
Not a problem, but I didn't believe it.

Many of us in Regina would kill, and I mean literally kill for a proposal like this. Still hoping to see a 105-110m proposal some day, but I'll probably be dead before that.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2014, 5:15 PM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,682
It's awesome how fast they're growing and this proposal is impressive. Taller than anything in London or Hamilton. I'm a bit concerned about what will happen to Fort Mac when the tar sands become depleted. What's the estimation of how many years of oil they have? FM has the potential to become one of the largest ghost towns in the world if they don't diversify their economy.
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2014, 5:23 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,842
Game changer indeed. This would be the best thing ever to happen to downtown Fort Mac. For once, the term "world-class" is entirely appropriate.
__________________
"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."-President Lyndon B. Johnson Donald Trump is a poor man's idea of a rich man, a weak man's idea of a strong man, and a stupid man's idea of a smart man. Am I an Asseau?
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2014, 7:42 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by middeljohn View Post
It's awesome how fast they're growing and this proposal is impressive. Taller than anything in London or Hamilton. I'm a bit concerned about what will happen to Fort Mac when the tar sands become depleted. What's the estimation of how many years of oil they have? FM has the potential to become one of the largest ghost towns in the world if they don't diversify their economy.
At peak production (5 million barrels per day), I think the estimate is that the oil will last for over a century. With new technologies opening up a much larger area of the sands to be produced, oil could potentially be produced there for a thousands years. Currently recoverable oil reserves are 170 billion barrels, however, there is a total of 1.7 trillion barrels in the Athabaska deposit, with potentially up to a trillion barrels recoverable with in-situ methods. Once humanity's dependence on oil is decreased, production will certainly fall. That said, if after 40 years oil becomes replaced with a different dominant energy medium, humanity will still always need oil (textiles, lubricants, etc), so oil will likely be produced from the sands indefinitely, meaning Fort Mac may decline to a stable, rather than explosive, population, but it won't die for a very very long time.

Also, yes it will be taller than anything in London or Hamilton. Also Winnipeg, Quebec City, Phoenix, and many other cities significantly larger.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2014, 7:48 PM
Deepstar's Avatar
Deepstar Deepstar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Edmonton will be building taller than 150 meters any time now. I wouldn't worry about that. It would be the tallest building north of Edmonton on the continent though. Actually, I think it would be the tallest in the world north of the 56th Parallel.
Isn't Epcor already taller than this proposal? I thought Epcor was 492'
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2014, 8:37 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Those are the poles on top of Epcor. They are 490 ft. The roof height is 140 meters, and Edmonton's tallest, Manulife, is 146 meters.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2014, 11:00 PM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Bold move, Fort McMurray.

Quote:
Fort McMurray would have a taller "tallest" building than Edmonton. Something seems wrong about that.
Mississauga already did that with Absolute World.

Edmonton's tallest is technically the EPCOR Tower, which is 149m with the spire, but in reality the building is more like 140m, this continuing Manulife Place's 30+ year reign as Edmonton's tallest at 147m.

But due to the lifted height limits over Downtown Edmonton, this shouldn't be the case for much longer. 102 St Centre is ready to go (just looking for a primary tenant, which a few may be interested) and would be 161m. The Arena District towers would also be above 150m, I do believe. There's also the (less likely) Edmontonian condos, which are pegged at over 200m now.
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2014, 2:23 AM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by ue View Post
Bold move, Fort McMurray.



Mississauga already did that with Absolute World.

Edmonton's tallest is technically the EPCOR Tower, which is 149m with the spire, but in reality the building is more like 140m, this continuing Manulife Place's 30+ year reign as Edmonton's tallest at 147m.

But due to the lifted height limits over Downtown Edmonton, this shouldn't be the case for much longer. 102 St Centre is ready to go (just looking for a primary tenant, which a few may be interested) and would be 161m. The Arena District towers would also be above 150m, I do believe. There's also the (less likely) Edmontonian condos, which are pegged at over 200m now.
I'm afraid I don't understand the connection you're trying to make. Mississauga has over 700,000 people. A 150m building there doesn't seem off at all.
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2014, 7:02 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is offline
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,318
Where does the 149 m / 37 floor height come from? The building elevations and renderings show a 107 m / 25 floor building.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:00 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.