HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


    Comcast Innovation & Technology Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Philadelphia Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Philadelphia Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #861  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2014, 7:24 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyscraper View Post
I think someone miscalculated the initial square footage and that this is just a correction, my personal opinion. They are still calling it 59 stories.
What I don't understand is how the cost of the building went from $1.2 billion to $933 million. Have they value engineered $300 million out of this thing?
Im pretty sure interior fit out isnt normally included in price in a leased office building where tenant is going to fund that work. Then again, Im not sure that most tenants take on that expense in the way comcast is doing. Its incredible that they are projecting this building to be $400M more than the comcast center which is only 6 years old.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #862  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2014, 7:38 PM
iheartphilly's Avatar
iheartphilly iheartphilly is offline
Philly Rising Up!
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: motherEarth
Posts: 3,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1487 View Post
Im pretty sure interior fit out isnt normally included in price in a leased office building where tenant is going to fund that work. Then again, Im not sure that most tenants take on that expense in the way comcast is doing. Its incredible that they are projecting this building to be $400M more than the comcast center which is only 6 years old.
Probably due to the radical design of this building that caused an increase in both labor cost and structural materials to support the huge floor plates and "open floor plan" per each floor (1 floor plate equals 12 tennis courts), 13 three-story collaborative work lofts, each of them will have a three-story atrium, and all glass elevators on the north side of the building, etc. Not your typical office building. Fit and finish looks very high quality too. LEED Platinum too adds to the costs.

Last edited by iheartphilly; Jul 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM. Reason: clarification
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #863  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2014, 12:50 AM
Baconboy007 Baconboy007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyscraper View Post
I think someone miscalculated the initial square footage and that this is just a correction, my personal opinion. They are still calling it 59 stories.
What I don't understand is how the cost of the building went from $1.2 billion to $933 million. Have they value engineered $300 million out of this thing?
That's the six month introductory rate. After that it goes back to $1.2 billion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #864  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2014, 1:03 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartphilly View Post
Probably due to the radical design of this building that caused an increase in both labor cost and structural materials to support the huge floor plates and "open floor plan" per each floor (1 floor plate equals 12 tennis courts), 13 three-story collaborative work lofts, each of them will have a three-story atrium, and all glass elevators on the north side of the building, etc. Not your typical office building. Fit and finish looks very high quality too. LEED Platinum too adds to the costs.
Agreed, its obvious they really have architect free hand to design a building without cost constraints because the cost per sf is going to be astronomical for this building. And it's not like the CC was a cheap building. when you consider FMC tower is projected to be only $385M for a 49 story building with over 700k sf this building is priced at a serious premium. Makes me wonder about ther chances of filling the balance of the space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #865  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2014, 11:50 AM
ConstructStudent ConstructStudent is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1487 View Post
Agreed, its obvious they really have architect free hand to design a building without cost constraints because the cost per sf is going to be astronomical for this building. And it's not like the CC was a cheap building. when you consider FMC tower is projected to be only $385M for a 49 story building with over 700k sf this building is priced at a serious premium. Makes me wonder about ther chances of filling the balance of the space.
The reason for the price being higher than FMC is due to FMC is not completely leased and the interior fitout of the office space is not included in that cost. Only the fitout of the residential units are included in that cost of FMC. Where as the cost for CITC includes the fitout for the hotel and also all of the Comcast Space. Also a large driving factor would be the excavation cost because of how deep they are digging from grade. That could add at least an extra $7 million. To excavate and truck of a cubic yard of dirt in the city is somewhere around $40-$50 /cy. for a non difficult excavation which CITC is the complete opposite.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #866  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2014, 12:27 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConstructStudent View Post
The reason for the price being higher than FMC is due to FMC is not completely leased and the interior fitout of the office space is not included in that cost. Only the fitout of the residential units are included in that cost of FMC. Where as the cost for CITC includes the fitout for the hotel and also all of the Comcast Space. Also a large driving factor would be the excavation cost because of how deep they are digging from grade. That could add at least an extra $7 million. To excavate and truck of a cubic yard of dirt in the city is somewhere around $40-$50 /cy. for a non difficult excavation which CITC is the complete opposite.
I was comparing the $385M to the $933M figure so I was not counting the comcast funded fit out of the office space in the building. even with the differences in the foundation excavation costs there is a huge differential in cost per sf between the buildings. FMC is a very standard issue, almost cookie cutter skyscraper so i suppose its cost is more in line with what a "typical" high rise commercial building would cost in Philly. CITC is obviously a building that was designed with few cost constraints.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #867  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2014, 5:50 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
They are doing test borings today at the site. There were a lot of people around, but not much digging.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #868  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2014, 5:51 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1487 View Post
They are doing test borings today at the site. There were a lot of people around, but not much digging.
Test boring is a crucial first step! Glad to see! FMC Tower finished test boring about two weeks ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #869  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2014, 6:23 PM
Philly Fan Philly Fan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
Test boring is a crucial first step! Glad to see! FMC Tower finished test boring about two weeks ago.
My dentist likes to do test boring--damn, does that hurt!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #870  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2014, 9:15 PM
Lincolndrive's Avatar
Lincolndrive Lincolndrive is offline
Realtor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 619
I updated some rather boring pictures on Building Philly although I'm fairly sure there was more than just a test drill on site around 4:45 today.

That being said, I did see one test drill on the western portion of the site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #871  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2014, 9:39 PM
Baconboy007 Baconboy007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincolndrive View Post
I updated some rather boring pictures on Building Philly although I'm fairly sure there was more than just a test drill on site around 4:45 today.

That being said, I did see one test drill on the western portion of the site.
Give yourself more credit than that, those pics show a good use of perspective and framing your subject matter to reflect the struggles of contemporary construction in the early 21st century.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #872  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2014, 11:52 PM
shadowbat2 shadowbat2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 902
Taken today:







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #873  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2014, 11:55 PM
Plokoon11 Plokoon11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,698
^ Is that one rig the boring digger?

Quote:
^ Also I noticed they installed the crane and but some steel in!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #874  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 1:13 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,917
Was this an earlier version from Foster?


http://www.visualhouse.co/comcast-to...qmoj6p5auppjn3










__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #875  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 3:11 PM
Downburst's Avatar
Downburst Downburst is offline
Bostonian
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 162
^Yes, I believe it was posted a few pages back. To be honest, seeing it again, I much prefer it to the current proposal. (Even though I do like the current proposal.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #876  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 3:14 PM
MikeNigh MikeNigh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 597
The old design was cooler. The current design is amazing too though.

Last edited by MikeNigh; Jul 10, 2014 at 3:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #877  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 8:20 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,917
Current version is probably better...the older one isn't bad.


_
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #878  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2014, 4:57 PM
apetrella802 apetrella802 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 546
monday morning

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
Current version is probably better...the older one isn't bad.


_
went by the site today, back hoes are digging and steel beams for the retaining walls are on site as well as a green privacy? fence with openings at certain pints.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #879  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2014, 6:19 PM
shakman's Avatar
shakman shakman is offline
Chairman
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PRMD - People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 2,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by apetrella802 View Post
went by the site today, back hoes are digging and steel beams for the retaining walls are on site as well as a green privacy? fence with openings at certain pints.
Is it a tarp attached to a chain link fence?
__________________
"I measure the value of life not by how much I have, instead by what I have done.

-sb
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #880  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2014, 6:28 PM
Jawnadelphia's Avatar
Jawnadelphia Jawnadelphia is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Wilmington, Delaware
Posts: 2,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakman View Post
Is it a tarp attached to a chain link fence?
It's like a fake Christmas tree material - w/ needles (like a fake bush) - attached to a chain link fence.

And yes, lots of activity, drilling, steel beams on site, it's getting loud down there!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:37 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.