Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us
Worth pointing out, though, that the KXAN reporting linked above actually supports my point -- that it's a bad scene for business owners who'd been relying on a functioning tunnel to make the flood situation better.
|
As I said, I'm interested in hearing where that was quoted from, as
1) It seems to be directly contradicted by the actual legal filing.
2) On Wednesday, the Statesman was reporting that the city was refusing to give a statement (as you'd expect, with litigation pending).
The fact that a business owner gives in to FUD based on no data isn't really material one way or another.
Threaded Mode