HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #441  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2019, 3:39 AM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,045
Careful with that drooling. No buildings have even been sketched yet. And what economic forces could possibly ever justify a supertall in this location?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #442  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2019, 3:41 AM
jpIllInoIs's Avatar
jpIllInoIs jpIllInoIs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 978
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakeshoredrive View Post
is it possible for a supertall to be built in the 78? it would definitely balance the skyline. i am not sure what the zoning is for this site.
Thats adorable
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #443  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2019, 12:59 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Not just that, there are significant differences between the two projects that have been discussed in this thread previously.

The 78 was always going to have a big mixed-use development on it, back in the Rezko days, back with Goldberg's master plan for River City in the 1970s, and even in the 1920s when the river was being straightened this site was supposed to be an extension of downtown. The 78 is just the culmination of something decades in the making. Even Dearborn Park residents have always known that something big would eventually go here once the planets aligned.

Also, the 78's site is "out of sight, out of mind" - to Dearborn Parkers, Chinatown residents, and South Loop residents, this site exists on the other side of big infrastructural walls. It's not part of their neighborhoods.

Finally, and this is something that only matters to urban planners and us forumers: The 78 is just a better-planned development. It will have a proper connective street grid, a CTA subway station and probably water taxis and new bus routes to link it into downtown, which is directly adjacent (only a mile to Union Station). Given the design and location, it could actually function as a true transit-oriented neighborhood, so it will not cause the traffic armageddon that Lincoln Yards will.
The isolated nature of the site certainly plays a role but most of its neighbors just aren't prone to kicking up the noise that say Lincoln Park does. DP residents don't seem to really care as long as their little suburban slice of heaven isn't touched (see the need to shift the proposed Red Line head house). Certainly not the case at all for LP/Bucktown/WP residents.

The arguments for less density at LY due to street congestion aren't particularly persuasive to me when that's largely a result of a near total failure on our part to manage capacity. Lots of the city is developing even in places without optimal rail connections. We need to deal with reallocating the surface street resources we have rather than simply building to a standard that people in SOVs can tolerate. Americans will only actually do something when a situation is pushed well beyond tolerability (congestion pricing in NYC for example). Also as I already visit this pocket of the city at least a few times a week my opinion is of someone directly impacted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #444  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2019, 12:14 AM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Careful with that drooling. No buildings have even been sketched yet. And what economic forces could possibly ever justify a supertall in this location?
30 years ago Vista would have been laughed out of the room at LSE, because it too had no economic forces that would encourage someone to sell million dollar condos in that part of town... I'm not gonna argue it's likely, but it's 100% possible by 2045 that we are looking at that sort of situation...
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #445  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2019, 6:03 PM
Suiram Suiram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoboZill4 View Post
30 years ago Vista would have been laughed out of the room at LSE, because it too had no economic forces that would encourage someone to sell million dollar condos in that part of town... I'm not gonna argue it's likely, but it's 100% possible by 2045 that we are looking at that sort of situation...
Exactly. Related will work to get a generous allotment of FAR / units into their PD and start building tower by tower over the next decades. Most likely as the buildings get built there will be some leftover and leave them flexibility towards the end to decide what makes sense for their final plots. Keep in mind it will most likely be new people deciding since those in charge today will be dead or at least retired.

Maybe buildings keep getting taller. Maybe DP gets acquired for redevelopment. Nobody knows but I am sure Related is angling to give themselves flexibility
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #446  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2019, 9:56 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,045
The PD has already been approved, and building height is capped at 950 ft. But as we saw at Central Station, height limits can easily be waived.

The laws of economics are not so easily waived.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #447  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 12:33 AM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Team Alinghi
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,286
Despite City Approval, South Loop’s ‘The 78’ Mega-Project A Work In Progress As Neighbors Sound Off
https://blockclubchicago.org/2019/04...ors-sound-off/

A weak retroactive attempt at a community-driven development process?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #448  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 2:15 PM
Jim in Chicago Jim in Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 315
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Despite City Approval, South Loop’s ‘The 78’ Mega-Project A Work In Progress As Neighbors Sound Off
https://blockclubchicago.org/2019/04...ors-sound-off/

A weak retroactive attempt at a community-driven development process?
I have no doubt that there are many issues that should be resolved, but Neighborhood displacement? Um, there is no neighborhood there - the site is walled off and a wasteland. Who's being displaced?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #449  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 2:46 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,859
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in Chicago View Post
I have no doubt that there are many issues that should be resolved, but Neighborhood displacement? Um, there is no neighborhood there - the site is walled off and a wasteland. Who's being displaced?
Lol don't dispute the narrative, we gotta push the narrative at all times!

Seriously though, this site is like a Mile from anywhere that isn't already condo towers full of upper middle class white people. These DSA types are getting truly rediculous...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #450  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 2:49 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 1,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
Lol don't dispute the narrative, we gotta push the narrative at all times!

Seriously though, this site is like a Mile from anywhere that isn't already condo towers full of upper middle class white people. These DSA types are getting truly rediculous...
Chinatown is two blocks away
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #451  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 3:10 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,412
The amendment that would have approved the CTA station for the 78 has been deferred. Being in the 25th Ward and not the 3rd, there's a new alderman.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #452  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 3:19 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,859
^^^ Great so pinko is probably going to screw up the train station by trying to use it to force the developers to add "affordable housing".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Chinatown is two blocks away
I suppose, but Chinatown is an entity unto itself and I don't see that community ever being infiltrated by "gentrifiers". There was just an article the other day about how there are basically no English language apartment listings in that entire area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #453  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 3:26 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
^^^ Great so pinko is probably going to screw up the train station by trying to use it to force the developers to add "affordable housing".



I suppose, but Chinatown is an entity unto itself and I don't see that community ever being infiltrated by "gentrifiers". There was just an article the other day about how there are basically no English language apartment listings in that entire area.
Probably... He's sitting to the right of me at plan commission right now...

I have no problem with more affordable housing, but just add it on top of the density that already been approved. If the new alderman wants 1,000 affordable units, FINE! just add that 1,000 to the 10,000 units already approved.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #454  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 3:32 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 16,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
Probably... He's sitting to the right of me at plan commission right now...
^ Tap him on the shoulder and say "You better damn well not trip up the CTA Red Line station!"

Seriously, we need to END Aldermanic prerogative
__________________
I drink, therefore I am
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #455  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 3:46 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ Tap him on the shoulder and say "You better damn well not trip up the CTA Red Line station!"

Seriously, we need to END Aldermanic prerogative
He's not alderman yet. It may be Related wanting to play nice.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #456  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 4:14 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Team Alinghi
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,286
Is Related deferring the revised plan for 1061 Van Buren too? That's also in the 25th Ward.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #457  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 5:15 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Is Related deferring the revised plan for 1061 Van Buren too? That's also in the 25th Ward.
Yes...
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #458  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2019, 5:35 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 16,983
^ You've gotta be kidding me.

None. Of. This. Is. Necessary
__________________
I drink, therefore I am
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #459  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2019, 3:15 PM
Jim in Chicago Jim in Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Chinatown is two blocks away
And no one in Chinatown is being displaced - except, I guess, for the couple buildings already removed for the Wells St. expansion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #460  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2019, 3:18 PM
Handro Handro is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in Chicago View Post
And no one in Chinatown is being displaced - except, I guess, for the couple buildings already removed for the Wells St. expansion.
Not to mention Chinatown property is owned by Chinese people, and any renters are Chinese specifically rented to because they Chinese. If anything, rising property values would be great for the people in that neighborhood. Anyone raising the prospect of "gentrification" in Chinatown is either lying or oblivious.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:34 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.