HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


    Monaghan Square I in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Halifax Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2011, 7:56 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
It is over the as of right development heights, but there is a schedule in the Peninsula Land Use Bylaw (Schedule 'Q') that's been there for a number of years to encourage this type of development in the area. So if some of the adjacent car lots leave or the strip mall next to superstore decided to redevelop - we could see a lot more of this.

Personally; I'm hoping Piercey's will pack it in, along with the post office. Not that I don't think a sorting facility is needed, but I seem to recall a bigger once is needed, so hopefully it will hit the road for another location - opening up way more areas for this type of thing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2011, 9:44 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,017
Right at the end of the Bayers Road bottleneck that according to Watts and her NIMBY friends doesn't need to be widened. Hope none of the folks in these towers or the others y'all are talking about never need to go to/from Bayers LAke.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2011, 9:51 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
If it were me; I'd likely go over to Dartmouth Common.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2011, 10:43 PM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
Right at the end of the Bayers Road bottleneck that according to Watts and her NIMBY friends doesn't need to be widened. Hope none of the folks in these towers or the others y'all are talking about never need to go to/from Bayers LAke.
Yes I think that 3 lane stretch between Windsor and Connaught should be widened to 4 lanes ASAP in order to encourage development in the North End. I think it is a great area for high rise redevelopment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2011, 2:26 AM
resetcbu1's Avatar
resetcbu1 resetcbu1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxboyns View Post
This is impressive.
I'm not sure if you agree with me DJ; but this reminds me of a wider version of the building your family lives in; in Calgary?

I am all in favour of this...definitely. Will be at the City office tomorrow - will ask about this.
Reminds me of the "London" , at Macleod tr & Heritage dr , once they finally finish it that is.

Think this will be great personaly, now imagne if they built a stadium in the area(forum), what a change that could be to this area. And the potential to fill those retail areas on the main floor with a team bar and CFL team official team store, now that'd be sweeeeeet!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2011, 2:34 AM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by resetcbu1 View Post
Reminds me of the "London" , at Macleod tr & Heritage dr , once they finally finish it that is.

Think this will be great personaly, now imagne if they built a stadium in the area(forum), what a change that could be to this area. And the potential to fill those retail areas on the main floor with a team bar and CFL team official team store, now that'd be sweeeeeet!
A stadium in that area would inspire building proposals much taller than 17 storeys.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2011, 2:49 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxboyns View Post
This is impressive.
I'm not sure if you agree with me DJ; but this reminds me of a wider version of the building your family lives in; in Calgary?

I am all in favour of this...definitely. Will be at the City office tomorrow - will ask about this.
It does remind me of the building in Calgary quite a bit but the height it different. The one my brother lives in has three towers. The two completed are 17 and 24 floors and the third underway is 32 floors I believe. If this is even close to as good as the Calgary one I will be very pleased.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2011, 5:28 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
From the CH website....

Twin apartment towers proposed for Young Street
A Halifax developer wants to turn a strip mall on Young Street in Halifax into a complex that includes two 17-storey apartment towers.

WM Apartments has asked the municipality for permission to build the towers around a four-storey building that would include more rental units and ground-floor retail space.

"It’s a phenomenal development," Robert Margeson, vice-president of WM Apartments, said in an interview Wednesday.

"We feel it’s very good for the city and great for the neighbourhood."

A public meeting on the proposal is scheduled for next Wednesday at 7 p.m. at the municipal planning office on Bayers Road.

WM Apartments has owned the strip mall, which included a land lease with Halifax Regional Municipality, since1994. A sister company bought the one-hectare property, which is across from the Atlantic Superstore, from the municipality last month. The property is assessed at $4.9 million.

Margeson wouldn’t put a preliminary price tag on the development, which includes 320 apartments and 33,000 square feet of retail space. Parking would be mostly underground but also include a parking lot for 57 vehicles.

"We feel the site is ideal for that type of development. It’s underutilized, with the original building built as a warehouse in the ’60s."

Construction would take about two years after the project is approved, he said.

The landlord will be involved in relocating the 14 strip mall tenants, Margeson said.

Coun. Jennifer Watts (Connaught-Quinpool) said there is a lot of development potential in the commercial area above North Street.

But the area council said such a large project should be considered as part of a regional plan that is in the works for the urban core.

"This development has the potential to set the tone. My concern is that it be done carefully, with a real eye to the future."

Watts said the project would be similar to Westwood Development Ltd.’s nearby Gladstone development.

"There was actually quite a bit of concern in the neighbourhood about the height," she said of the complex at Gladstone and Almon streets.

"Some folks may not like the height of those buildings, but I think the fear of the potential negative impact has not, in fact, played out, from my discussions with folks on the street."

The rest of the story is here.

I actually rather like Watt's comments. That gives me hope that perhaps that the issue of building height is finally starting to be understood by people. Granted, this building is much higher but there is no residential around it so the issue of height is mute.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2011, 5:36 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
It's nice to see some acknowledgement of the fact that Gladstone had very little negative impact on nearby residential and in fact is nicer than the old abandoned site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2011, 5:49 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
It's nice to see some acknowledgement of the fact that Gladstone had very little negative impact on nearby residential and in fact is nicer than the old abandoned site.
Exactly my thought. They could even go 20+ stories there and I doubt there would be any significant issues with it. The shadow impacts would be minimal if any. But the first comment in the CH article shows there is still more work to be done - a vertical slum. I nearly wanted to jump through my computer...and what's even more annoying is that the CH cut off the comments so soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2011, 6:15 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxboyns View Post
Exactly my thought. They could even go 20+ stories there and I doubt there would be any significant issues with it. The shadow impacts would be minimal if any. But the first comment in the CH article shows there is still more work to be done - a vertical slum. I nearly wanted to jump through my computer...and what's even more annoying is that the CH cut off the comments so soon.
One saying I like is "knowing just enough to be dangerous". That describes a large percentage of these comments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2011, 7:27 PM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
we built this city
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,801
Nobody lives near these, its near a grocery store, gas station, office tower, and recreational facilities.

Lets get it built, the comments from Watts are better than I expected... however she doesn't say much, so this could flip at any time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2011, 7:34 PM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
we built this city
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxboyns View Post

"There was actually quite a bit of concern in the neighbourhood about the height," she said of the complex at Gladstone and Almon streets.

I actually rather like Watt's comments. That gives me hope that perhaps that the issue of building height is finally starting to be understood by people. Granted, this building is much higher but there is no residential around it so the issue of height is mute.
What scares me about this is that she actually equates this block of all commercial to the sleepy residential streets up near Willow and Windsor.

Young needs people living on it given the built in infrastucture I mention above.

I assume council will pass this though, it makes so much sense! If a stadium was built nearby, this would be quite the area!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2011, 8:24 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,355
Public Information Meeting for this project is tomorrow night at the planning offices on Bayers Road (7pm).

I can't attend but hopefully some other froumers can go and call out the NIMBY's when they start saying this not a high-rise friendly area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2011, 9:15 PM
Dart101 Dart101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Make it happen

There is absolutely no good reason why this should not go ahead, it looks good and is an area that could accomodate plenty of residents. I hope all goes well at the meeting and the nimbys hit a wall when it comes to killing this proposal!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2011, 4:40 PM
Wishblade's Avatar
Wishblade Wishblade is offline
You talkin' to me?
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,322
Looks as though these were well received at the recent public meeting. Even Blair Beed is on board, and if anyone has ever read his letters to the media, he is usually a stark opponent of new development.


Quote:
Young Street development well-received at meeting

By PAT LEE Staff Reporter
Thu, Oct 6 - 7:41 AM

A mixed development proposed for the "wasteland" along Halifax’s Young Street was generally well-received at a public meeting Wednesday night.

While not everyone was entirely in favour of the proposed L-shaped residential towers and commercial units, there was agreement that residential development would be a welcome change in an area mostly defined by parking lots, car dealerships and strip malls.

Blair Beed, a noted opponent of many modern developments, said even he is in favour of such a proposal.

"I really like this plan to get people into the area. It’s a wasteland at night," he said. "This is great for the neighbourhood."

The property, now a one-storey strip mall, is next to Young Tower and abuts the Mayflower Curling Club on Monaghan Drive. The property faces the Atlantic Superstore on Young Street.
more here: http://thechronicleherald.ca/Metro/1266954.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2011, 8:35 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Like I mentioned in the other thread, this one ties in very well with the shipbuilding contract.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2011, 3:33 AM
Empire's Avatar
Empire Empire is offline
Salty Town
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishblade View Post
Looks as though these were well received at the recent public meeting. Even Blair Beed is on board, and if anyone has ever read his letters to the media, he is usually a stark opponent of new development.

more here: http://thechronicleherald.ca/Metro/1266954.html
Perfect..............The Young St. corridor should become the dumping ground for the Blair Beeds, Bev Millers, Phil Paceys and any other host of non development left wing radicals...oh yes, Howie Epstein.

This should be the new Cogswell St. Interchange dumping ground.....convention centres, stadiums, areans, tallllll office and apartment buildings etc.

Dump it all from Young to the basin.
__________________
Salty Town

Last edited by Empire; Nov 26, 2011 at 1:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2011, 4:03 AM
-Harlington-'s Avatar
-Harlington- -Harlington- is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Halifax-Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,097
This should be quite visible coming onto the peninsula from the west, from places like Fairview and Bedford .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2011, 4:47 AM
pblaauw pblaauw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Harlington- View Post
This should be quite visible coming onto the peninsula from the west, from places like Fairview and Bedford .
...and the MacKay Bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:03 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.