HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #14561  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 12:18 AM
Hayward's Avatar
Hayward Hayward is offline
The land of beige precast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,519
Eventually we may see large online versions of the exterior. I think the exterior of this building by AMLI is nice:

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=South+...9.35,,0,-36.15

But that greenspace out front is useless. Regardless of neighborhood complaints, pushing the buildings to the perimeter and creating a large private courtyard behind would be a huge selling point. I mean...large private courtyards with recreation, trees, etc is pretty damn rare in this city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14562  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 1:58 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 4,679
Burberry - last week


Jan 13




Jan 26

Putting a floor on top of the foundation. This gravel is being poured out on top of the thick rebar laden "pad", today they were covering the gravel with a yellow plastic, and had the wire mesh that is used in floors nearby.
__________________
Harry C --- Picassa ---- Prarie School Traveler
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14563  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 2:39 AM
aic4ever aic4ever is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
Well I have the winning bid sitting right here in front of me and the total works out to about $72/SF and that includes extending HVAC (including VAV boxes), sprinklers/life safety system, Electrical, Plumbing, Drop ceiling, Interior Framing and all finishes. It doesn't include Furniture, but then again a construction bid almost never includes furniture since tenants usually bid that out separately. Also I've never seen "equipment" included in a build out cost. Any equipment (excluding IT infrastructure) you are bringing into the space is going to be completely separate from the fit-out costs. They are planning on using above average (but not stunning) finishes including a lot of stone work.

As I said before, we just did another build out a few years ago that was considered ridiculously high end with tons of interior walls, mahogany paneling, marble floors, Parquet floors in the massive executive offices, etc for a hair over $90/SF.

I'm not sure why you are comparing a track house to a Class A Office Building or why you are comparing from the ground up construction to interior fit out, but that has nothing to do with the subject at hand. Fact is I'm actually doing this kind of work and these are the real numbers we are paying. There is really nothing I can do to convince you if you don't believe me.
$50 to $100 per square foot is right for interior fit outs, depending on the finishes and what the property owner's definition of "white box" is.

I've got bids for the Barney's TI, Fred's Restaurant TI, Intermix, Bebe, two Lululemons including their flagship, Sprinkles, Ted Baker and Pomelatto under my belt over the past few years. Unless you're getting ludicrously high end like Ted Baker and Pomelatto did then that's a good range, especially for a tenant that sticks to a simple build-out.

A lot of times the responsibility for scope of work gets split between owner and tenant (Sprinkles in particular was a nightmare as far as that goes, renovating the base building for the developer then the buildout for the tenant) and you have to hash out who pays for what with the MEP/FP systems, but generally speaking you're talking about being in that range.

And yeah, usually the equipment and furniture is direct by the owner. Especially in the restaurants. They always seem to "have a guy" for their kitchen equipment in particular.

A lot of time they furnish light fixtures themselves, too, which also brings the construction number down, at least until they don't send plenum rated fixtures and it blows up the whole schedule anyway. Also millwork, which always throws another wrench in the works since if there's lighting in it that needs to be hard piped in the City, so if they pre-wire any lighted cabinets without conduit that ends up needing to be re-done.

The restaurants can climb into the $400/sf range when you factor in all the extra electrical, mechanical and plumbing they need, plus equipment and crazy light fixtures and finishes.

A lot of that is pretty speculative too, though, depending on how much stuff they're trying to cram into how little space.

Still, generally speaking, "normal" retail TI's are in that $50-$100 range.
__________________
Don't be a left wing zombie!

Free Nowhereman...fat girls need lovin' too

Last edited by aic4ever; Feb 2, 2012 at 2:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14564  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 8:02 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
insouciant
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: unconventionally bicoastal
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
No. In a meeting a couple of weeks ago about the AMLI project, one of the guys said "...but the cost to build it; well, I don't know if I have enough digits on my calculator," as if putting an underpass under Metra tracks were an undertaking comparable to building a nanotube into outer space.
This was a city official, an AMLI representative, or a community member?

That's pretty galling coming from a city official, but understandable from a member of the latter groups.
__________________
The joy and stimulus in architecture is the discovery of fresh combinations of old ingredients appropriate to present problems. I’d rather be right than contemporary. - Harry Weese
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14565  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 9:54 AM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
The architect claims this design is "for the future."
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
This is the kind of music they'll be playing in the lobby:

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14566  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 1:25 PM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
NEW YORK | CHICAGO
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ Problem is, until the South Loop's land values rise, you're going to see worthless crap like this get built, with lots of wasted land. Expect this to go one for another 50 years.
AMLI building useless crap? I can't believe my ears!

However I wouldn't point out that even high land values in River North haven't prevented them form building useless crap.
__________________
My: Skyscraper Art - Diagrams - Diagram Thread
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14567  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 2:23 PM
Hayward's Avatar
Hayward Hayward is offline
The land of beige precast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,519
Regarding the Clark and Polk project, I put together a quick 3D model of how I may have arranged the buildings on site.

Disclaimer: This is just an idea and of course I don't know the specifics behind the project. Don't look too deep into the architecture either. I slapped this together in 2 hours. Basically, I don't think the streetwall on Clark would be all that bad.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14568  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 3:46 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by J_M_Tungsten View Post
^lol! Great first post!
I'm not sure if he's a moron or if he's being sarcastic. Lol.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aic4ever View Post
$50 to $100 per square foot is right for interior fit outs, depending on the finishes and what the property owner's definition of "white box" is.

I've got bids for the Barney's TI, Fred's Restaurant TI, Intermix, Bebe, two Lululemons including their flagship, Sprinkles, Ted Baker and Pomelatto under my belt over the past few years. Unless you're getting ludicrously high end like Ted Baker and Pomelatto did then that's a good range, especially for a tenant that sticks to a simple build-out.

A lot of times the responsibility for scope of work gets split between owner and tenant (Sprinkles in particular was a nightmare as far as that goes, renovating the base building for the developer then the buildout for the tenant) and you have to hash out who pays for what with the MEP/FP systems, but generally speaking you're talking about being in that range.

And yeah, usually the equipment and furniture is direct by the owner. Especially in the restaurants. They always seem to "have a guy" for their kitchen equipment in particular.

A lot of time they furnish light fixtures themselves, too, which also brings the construction number down, at least until they don't send plenum rated fixtures and it blows up the whole schedule anyway. Also millwork, which always throws another wrench in the works since if there's lighting in it that needs to be hard piped in the City, so if they pre-wire any lighted cabinets without conduit that ends up needing to be re-done.

The restaurants can climb into the $400/sf range when you factor in all the extra electrical, mechanical and plumbing they need, plus equipment and crazy light fixtures and finishes.

A lot of that is pretty speculative too, though, depending on how much stuff they're trying to cram into how little space.

Still, generally speaking, "normal" retail TI's are in that $50-$100 range.
Thanks for backing me up on this. I'm not sure what retail use he is expecting in RC that will exceed $100/SF. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of tenants end up spending $50 or less building out depending on existing conditions. If you are putting in a Big Lots your finishes are going to be dirt cheap and you'll have almost no interior framing to complete. Most of the cost is shelving and building systems.

Of course we are not talking about a Barneys here. Obviously when you slather the inside of your space with marble and custom everything and have all sorts of atriums in your space the TI's are going to skyrocket. What was your bid for Barneys at if you dont mind sharing. You can just give me a range. I'm shocked if it's less than $150 judging by what I've seen of that building. Does it include the restaurant on top?

And restaurants are completely different because you are talking about a space that requires commercial grade kitchens, a bar area, ventilation system, etc. Also, there is a good reason most restaurants go out of business in a year or two. Comparing a restaurant to normal retail is like comparing lab space to office space, same shell, completely different product.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14569  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 4:24 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,066
AMLI South Loop Proposal

What an obnoxious proposed development all-around. Apart from the anti-urban site plan (even Hayward's suggested repositioning of the same basic towers around the site would I think be quite helpful.....incidentally after an instant viewing the actual plan, I also imagined them better oriented exactly as Hayward places them), the architecture is just junk. AMLI is an atrocious developer of downtown projects - atrocious. Their first effort in 900 South was probably passable as a work of architecture - maybe just barely, but instead of improving their design impact on the city, AMLI decided to just completely throw in the towel and go cliff-diving.....what a trashy firm as far as being a contributer to the development of this city!! This proposal makes the former AvalonBay plan for the site look like AIA first-place prize material....
__________________
In the Loop, 24/7
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14570  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 6:27 PM
nicksplace27 nicksplace27 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayward View Post
Regarding the Clark and Polk project, I put together a quick 3D model of how I may have arranged the buildings on site.

Disclaimer: This is just an idea and of course I don't know the specifics behind the project. Don't look too deep into the architecture either. I slapped this together in 2 hours. Basically, I don't think the streetwall on Clark would be all that bad.
For the love of God man! Send that to the developers please!!!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14571  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 6:31 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young & Egotistic View Post


I'm not a moron I just feel developments with parking lots gives a little to the neighborhood. Lately it has been proven to developers that having suburban style developments are better.


I'm very confused...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14572  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 6:41 PM
eaguir3 eaguir3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 144
[QUOTE=Young & Egotistic;5574517]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
I'm not sure if he's a moron or if he's being sarcastic. Lol.


I'm not a moron I just feel developments with parking lots gives a little to the neighborhood. Lately it has been proven to developers that having suburban style developments are better.
I think your in the wrong forum.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14573  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 6:59 PM
lawfin lawfin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayward View Post
Regarding the Clark and Polk project, I put together a quick 3D model of how I may have arranged the buildings on site.

Disclaimer: This is just an idea and of course I don't know the specifics behind the project. Don't look too deep into the architecture either. I slapped this together in 2 hours. Basically, I don't think the streetwall on Clark would be all that bad.



That is really much better than what is proposed. and that interior space if I am not mistake gets western sun to boot. You have transmuted dog shit into lead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14574  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 7:09 PM
untitledreality untitledreality is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicksplace27 View Post
For the love of God man! Send that to the developers please!!!!!
Agreed. It is absurd how such a simple reorientation improves this project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14575  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 7:11 PM
rgolch's Avatar
rgolch rgolch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 626
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
Navy Pier designs!!!!!!
Some really good potential here!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...,5213075.story
Sorry, I'm a few days late to this post.

So what's the deal with this Navy Pier concepts. Is the city earnestly thinking of redesigning Navy Pier. Or is this all just vaporware? I really don't want to get excited about something that has no chance of coming to fruition.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14576  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 9:46 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,543
^^^ There are concrete plans to do something with Navy Pier, but the question is whether there is actually the budget to do anything more than light updates.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14577  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2012, 11:37 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
insouciant
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: unconventionally bicoastal
Posts: 8,452
Nice. I like how Hayward's scheme preserves space for a future third building along Polk. If the garage is designed for vertical expansion, it would be a great way for AMLI to plan for the future.

The site plan also continues LaSalle southward though the site, which is theoretically great but not very useful unless the Feds ever decide they don't need a bomb-proof loading dock and reopen LaSalle. I'm guessing AMLI would prefer a private interior space, which could be done with a tasteful garden wall and an electronic gate on the driveways.
__________________
The joy and stimulus in architecture is the discovery of fresh combinations of old ingredients appropriate to present problems. I’d rather be right than contemporary. - Harry Weese
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14578  
Old Posted: Feb 3, 2012, 1:17 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,917
Hayward, I second whoever said to send your renderings to the developer. They are 10 times better!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14579  
Old Posted: Feb 3, 2012, 3:07 AM
Hayward's Avatar
Hayward Hayward is offline
The land of beige precast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,519
Thanks guys, I appreciate your comments. Wish I could do more with them, unfortunately my hands are tied.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14580  
Old Posted: Feb 3, 2012, 2:25 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,066
As we were just discussing, below link to the leasing brochure McCaffery currently has posted on its website - I hadn't seen this version before. It highlights the changes McCaffery is working on....looks like they are making some escalator/elevator changes as well:


http://www.mccafferyinterests.com/re...n_11_22_11.pdf


I'm really hoping - although I fear this may be futile - that McCaffery will find the courage to hire an architecture firm other than Antunovich to design the rental tower(s) that will be coming for the adjoining parcel..........McCaffery Interests is one of these developers that seems to be just hopelessly addicted to bad design......others include Prime Group (Michael Reschke), AMLI (Greg Mutz), Sedgwick Properties (Marty Paris).............my suspicion is perhaps more than any other single factor (including apathy toward design), the most common driving force may simply be personal bad taste among the leaders of such outfits....
__________________
In the Loop, 24/7
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:58 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.