Skyscraper posters - sale!  
HomeDiagramsCitiesForumSkyscraper PostersStore
     
--> Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web. The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics. SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

You are currently browsing as a guest. Register with the SkyscraperPage Forum and join this growing community of skyscraper enthusiasts. Registering has benefits such as fewer ad banners, the ability to post messages, private messaging and more.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction

Burj Dubai in the SkyscraperPage Database
  Status: under-construction    Completion: 2010

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Dubai Skyscraper Diagram

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2001  
Old 11-25-2006, 06:27 PM
alphawolf's Avatar
alphawolf alphawolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the wood...
Posts: 637

Is Al Burj still pretty hush hush? I haven't heard much about that one in some time.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2002  
Old 11-25-2006, 07:08 PM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,985

some renderings on the first page would be sweet


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2003  
Old 11-25-2006, 09:19 PM
Bergenser's Avatar
Bergenser Bergenser is offline
Information Age
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 2,951

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky Tower
Mmm, not so sure. I think the Al Burj will give this one a run for its money. It could easily reach a kilometer tall. It probably will too if Nakheel get their way......which they normally do. Got a feeling they will want to challenge the WTB when they know what height they have to beat!
EMAAR know this, so is probably the biggest driving force for them to go taller now.

Only in Dubai!
Cool! so, the Al Burj can be the next WTB?
The competition makes the buildings taller and taller.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2004  
Old 11-25-2006, 09:24 PM
Nowhereman1280's Avatar
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
Hot Stuff!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago or Milwaukee
Posts: 4,844

Al Burj better be at least decent looking, if not, I'll be pretty annoyed, anyone can build a huge structure, but very few can make a graceful, economic, efficiant, and tall building. Malec has a point a 1001 meter cuboid would look like shit and ruin the skyline!


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2005  
Old 11-25-2006, 10:07 PM
Distill3d's Avatar
Distill3d Distill3d is online now
Glorfied Overrated Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver (Coquitlam), British Columbia
Posts: 3,394

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alliance
I haven't been real happy with this building. There's nothing real special about it, save its height. "World's Tallest" is great, but that title will eventually be lost. Especailly since we havent seen any facing, I feel like this building is just mediocrity on a grand scale...nothing like what made Burj al Arab a great building.
i'm sure the architects are sorry that they couldn't make it look like the refridgerator boxes the skyscrapers in the USA have been. personally, i love the way this thing looks.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2006  
Old 11-25-2006, 10:49 PM
Dalton Dalton is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 401

I'm not too happy with it either.

The setbacks appear way too random and numerous. The developers couldn't settle on a final height - and it shows. It's pretty damn tall though, and will deserve some respect for its audacity and the technological accomplishment. I don't think there's any other place on the globe right now where such a building could be constructed. Perhaps we should be grateful. How it will work for the people who use it remains to be seen. Is it possible to build too tall? This one is getting us closer to the answer, "yes".


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2007  
Old 11-25-2006, 10:50 PM
malec's Avatar
malec malec is offline
Rrrraaaahhhhh!!!!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,764

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280
Al Burj better be at least decent looking, if not, I'll be pretty annoyed, anyone can build a huge structure, but very few can make a graceful, economic, efficiant, and tall building. Malec has a point a 1001 meter cuboid would look like shit and ruin the skyline!
Al Burj is not so decent looking, it certainly doesn't deserve the title over burj dubai. Al Burj is actually made up of 3 towers connected at various points such as the 6 skylobbies. It's also hollow and will be lit up from the inside so should look great at night. In the day however, it's a giant concrete monolith.
I believe Nakheel have such a big ego (just look at their other projects) that they'd build this even if dubai's property market crashes before then. That's of course if they survive until then.


The latest news on al burj is this:

Contractors jockey for Burj Dubai rival tower scheme
CONSTRUCTION UAE
27 Oct 2006

Local real estate developer Nakheel has selected contractors to work on pre-construction agreements for its Al-Burj project. The tower will form the centrepiece of the first phase of the Dubai Waterfront development and is expected to be one of the tallest in the world. It may even challenge the 800-metre-plus Burj Dubai scheme being developed by the local Emaar Properties . In December last year, Nakheel confirmed that the tower will be at least 700 metres tall (MEED 9:12:05).

Companies working on preconstruction agreements, which involve value engineering and construction planning, include South Korea’s Samsung Corporation , Japan’s Shimizu Corporation and Australia’s Grocon . A US team of Pei Partnership Architects (PPA) and Axis Design Group (ADG) completed the preliminary designs for the tower late last year.

The pre-construction agreements are the latest sign of contract activity at Dubai Waterfront. In September, the joint venture of the local APCC with Vibro Foundation , a wholly-owned subsidiary of France’s Soletanche Bachy , was awarded a ground improvement contract for Palm Jebel Ali, which has been incorporated into the Dubai Waterfront development, and the local Ghantoot Transport & General Contracting was awarded the phase 1 earthmoving contract for phase 1 of Dubai Waterfront. Belgium’s Jan De Nul began working on the dredging package for Dubai Waterfront in July and is close to completing the reclamation and rock placement works for Palm Jebel Ali (MEED 22:9:06).


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2008  
Old 11-26-2006, 12:54 AM
dubai 1's Avatar
dubai 1 dubai 1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 200

"2,650' Pinnacle, 1,885' Roof / 162 Storeys " ? ok 1st the roof isnt 1,885'.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2009  
Old 11-26-2006, 03:53 AM
Beyond 1000's Avatar
Beyond 1000 Beyond 1000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: vancouver, bc
Posts: 722

At this point without the spire, you can look at the height as top of main structure which includes the steel section above the concrete. By Culwulla's diagram BD to "roof" reaches 740m.

I do believe that eventually Al Burj will surpass BD in height. This building will go for the big 1km and then some. Al Burj will probably reach BD's final height to it's roof and then get the spire(s) going. It will be some time however that Al Burj surpasses Burj Dubai. BD will enjoy it's reign for at least five years.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2010  
Old 11-26-2006, 04:50 AM
Sky Tower's Avatar
Sky Tower Sky Tower is offline
Mucking Fuddled!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 786

I agree. Not only do I think the B.D will exceed 850m in height, but Nakheel certainly have the ordasity and desire to be number one at any cost.

I would put money on this undeveloped spot to challenge the B.D. to the WTB title unless EMAAR does something realy silly and aim for the 1km mark themselves.....which I doubt very much!

I.M.O, Al Burj however has much more scope for more height because of its footprint width and 3 connected tower design.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2011  
Old 11-26-2006, 05:34 AM
vanhenrik's Avatar
vanhenrik vanhenrik is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: karlskoga
Posts: 481
progress





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2012  
Old 11-26-2006, 07:35 AM
SD_Phil's Avatar
SD_Phil SD_Phil is offline
Heavy User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,586

^Thanks for that. That does an amazing job of putting it in persepctive. It's amazing that the skeleton looks tall enough as it is and to think there is sooo much left to go.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2013  
Old 11-26-2006, 07:38 AM
WonderlandPark's Avatar
WonderlandPark WonderlandPark is offline
Pacific Wonderland
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bi-Situational, Portland & L.A.
Posts: 3,532

^^^ Amazing photo, holy mother of god that thing is going to be tall.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2014  
Old 11-26-2006, 10:26 AM
malec's Avatar
malec malec is offline
Rrrraaaahhhhh!!!!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,764

The picture of the actual tower under construction should be bigger since the mechanical floors don't line up


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2015  
Old 11-26-2006, 04:24 PM
mightygoose mightygoose is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 78

heh as for the al burj, i think it gonna push the burj dubai past its official height by quite a way. and then nakheel is just gonna throw money at the al burj till that beats it, he wont want to build a building on that scale and cost unless its the biggest.... and to be honest i think the al burj is far more elegant than the burj dubai


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2016  
Old 11-26-2006, 04:35 PM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,074

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fury
The CN tower has held the record for 30 some years ... This will hold it for a long time too.
One apparently forgets the difference between a true-blooded building and a ball on a stick. I'm sorry, but I could care less about what the world's tallest man-made structure is. I care about the worlds tallest functional building.

As there are many more cities that are capable of massive developments, the title will shift more rapidly. Especially since spire count, its very easy to shove a little stick on top and claim worlds tallest.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2017  
Old 11-26-2006, 07:43 PM
Fury Fury is offline
Proudly Canadian
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 397

And I, on the other hand, could care less about the WTB record. The World's Tallest Structure record is the big one - even if it is a needle at the top. I hope they stretch it to the limit !!


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2018  
Old 11-26-2006, 07:55 PM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,074

But it has no functional significance. I personally take more interest in buildings that combine form and function. Spires can work artistically, but they can also simply be a worthless tool to raise the "official height"

Regardless, unless the skyscraper market cools down, a taller building will be built. The US seemingly won't be in competition again, because of the 2000 ft cap. However, I can easily see Dubai, Hong Kong, or Beijing building a structure taller than BD in the next ten years. Technically, Dubai already has one in the works.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2019  
Old 11-26-2006, 08:23 PM
Fury Fury is offline
Proudly Canadian
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 397

Your right - and the 1001 m proposal in Kawait. I agree with the fuctional building thing - and this structure has that. This is also the first structure that will be taller than guyed masts so even if it as thin as a mast it is still the tallest manmade point on earth Higher = Better



A couple of new (old) shots


06 09 23



06 11 24





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2020  
Old 11-26-2006, 09:38 PM
mightygoose mightygoose is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 78

when you look at those photos and then look at the progress render you think, wooooooaaaaaaaah shit thats big on a stick


Reply With Quote
     
     
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction
Forum Jump




Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:19 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums Directory