HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction

    Shanghai Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Shanghai Skyscraper Diagram
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted: Feb 3, 2008, 2:39 AM
Shanghai_Fan Shanghai_Fan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 189
Rumour posted at ss.cn.

- Final design isn't any of the ones we have seen.
- They want it to be taller than Burj Dubai.
- They said it is expected to be 820m, 188 floors
- It is supposed to look like this:



@Vito Corleone, does it look like the front runner design you saw?

PS: I don't believe anything... I don't think it will surpass 550-650m.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted: Feb 3, 2008, 9:54 AM
xiahoudun's Avatar
xiahoudun xiahoudun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 157
I wonder when we will get some confirmation or denial about this 'rumor'... On the one hand that height would be spectacular...on the other hand...it would dwarf the Jin Mao and SWFC, and seriously change the skyline of Pudong. Would that make us really happy?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted: Feb 3, 2008, 12:11 PM
Fabb's Avatar
Fabb Fabb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 8,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by xiahoudun View Post
I wonder when we will get some confirmation or denial about this 'rumor'... On the one hand that height would be spectacular...on the other hand...it would dwarf the Jin Mao and SWFC, and seriously change the skyline of Pudong. Would that make us really happy?
You're right.
I'd rather have half a dozen 60 to 90 floor-towers than a 188-story monster that would make the other skyscrapers irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted: Feb 6, 2008, 12:47 AM
Rise To The Top Rise To The Top is offline
We can kiss the sky! - MC
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV/ Lincoln, NH
Posts: 575
Just as something to put out there, all of the proposals were in the 500-600m range. I can back this with some findings, mostly new proposals for this project, which is being called "Z3" or "Z3 Tower".

On Adrian Smith's website, I found this under Robert Forest's project experience:

"Z3 Tower
Architectural design for 550 meter supertall tower in Pudong district to complete original Pudong-Shanghai Masterplan, 2006, Shanghai, China"

I also found a new rendering from a different firm, here:



and a video of a proposal sent in by some students.

http://myspacetv.com/index.cfm?fusea...ideoid=4494821

Thats just some of what I found, many more proposals, but pointless to post them as it seems that the city wants a green building, with most not qualifying.

Last edited by Rise To The Top; Feb 6, 2008 at 12:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted: Feb 6, 2008, 10:54 PM
Pandemonious's Avatar
Pandemonious Pandemonious is offline
Chaos Machine
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,291
^That isn't new. Well, it is newly posted on this forum, but not new for this proposal.

That is the old design for Z3 that SOM did a few years ago before the Shanghai Center competition even took place.
__________________
My Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?m2346
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted: Feb 7, 2008, 6:37 PM
JDRCRASH's Avatar
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,594
+800 meters? Bullshit. I say it's speculation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted: Feb 7, 2008, 6:43 PM
Pandemonious's Avatar
Pandemonious Pandemonious is offline
Chaos Machine
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,291
^It isn't going to be 800 meters. That is pulled out of someone's ass.
__________________
My Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?m2346
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted: Feb 7, 2008, 7:14 PM
JDRCRASH's Avatar
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,594
Why make it only taller than Burj; why not make it taller than Al Burj, which is already conducting ground soil tests?
It's going to mean absolutely nothing if Al Burj get's built, which looks like it will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted: Feb 7, 2008, 10:18 PM
Pandemonious's Avatar
Pandemonious Pandemonious is offline
Chaos Machine
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,291
Why make it the tallest at all? The height of this tower will be around 600 m. It will add a nice balance to the skyline at around that height, and still be really tall.

I think it is more important to have a tower that has awesome architecture and engineering, and that despite not being the tallest in the world, will become an icon for Shanghai. This developer for this tower is also in it to make money, which building the WTB is definitely not the best route to go for that. Everyone knows that the top 200m+ of Burj are there just to make it tall, and is unusable space in respect to leasing/selling it to regain the cost to construct it. Even then, the floors 50-100m or so below that point are also very small and not all that economical.
__________________
My Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?m2346
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted: Feb 8, 2008, 5:21 AM
Ryan81's Avatar
Ryan81 Ryan81 is offline
Future Chicago
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandemonious View Post
^That isn't new. Well, it is newly posted on this forum, but not new for this proposal.

That is the old design for Z3 that SOM did a few years ago before the Shanghai Center competition even took place.
I could be completely wrong, and correct me if so, but if that proposal was a couple of years old, wouldn't SWFC (shown in the renderings) have a circular hole up top?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted: Feb 8, 2008, 10:43 AM
staff's Avatar
staff staff is offline
low life in a tall place
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne.AU | Malmö.SE
Posts: 5,478
^^
The hole design of SWFC changed more than two years ago, I think (2½ iirc).
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted: Feb 10, 2008, 2:26 AM
Rise To The Top Rise To The Top is offline
We can kiss the sky! - MC
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV/ Lincoln, NH
Posts: 575
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
Why make it only taller than Burj; why not make it taller than Al Burj, which is already conducting ground soil tests?
It's going to mean absolutely nothing if Al Burj get's built, which looks like it will.
Shanghai is a city of style. A 600m+ building would take most of that away, I highly doubt they will go taller than that. The whole skyline of Lujiazui is perfect right now. I actually kinda wish this tower gets moved north a bit to seperate the skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted: Feb 10, 2008, 7:05 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Shanghai/Vancouver
Posts: 6,562
^ It won't. I walked past the site today and it's on! All the storefronts on the site have been demolished. It's only a matter of time before we see the final rendering and the hole is dug.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted: Feb 10, 2008, 12:24 PM
The Chemist's Avatar
The Chemist The Chemist is online now
恭喜发财!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 中国上海/Shanghai
Posts: 7,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo View Post
^ It won't. I walked past the site today and it's on! All the storefronts on the site have been demolished. It's only a matter of time before we see the final rendering and the hole is dug.
Sweet! Another supertall in Lujiazui.
__________________
"Love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world."

- Jack Layton, 1950-2011
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted: Feb 11, 2008, 3:54 AM
JDRCRASH's Avatar
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo View Post
^ It won't. I walked past the site today and it's on! All the storefronts on the site have been demolished. It's only a matter of time before we see the final rendering and the hole is dug.
Well, at least the SWFC won't be the tallest in Shanghai anymore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted: Feb 11, 2008, 4:34 AM
The Chemist's Avatar
The Chemist The Chemist is online now
恭喜发财!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 中国上海/Shanghai
Posts: 7,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
Well, at least the SWFC won't be the tallest in Shanghai anymore.
Why 'at least'? The SWFC is a magnificent building and certainly deserves the title of Shanghai's tallest.
__________________
"Love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world."

- Jack Layton, 1950-2011
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted: Feb 11, 2008, 5:10 PM
JDRCRASH's Avatar
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,594
Don't get me wrong, I like it, but just not as the tallest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted: Feb 15, 2008, 6:19 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Shanghai/Vancouver
Posts: 6,562
I went to the site on February 8th and saw this:


All the storefronts have been demolished






My favourite rooftop patio was at this spot. I'm going to miss it.






Part of the site with the SWFC looming in the background.






It was sad to see the restaurant I once frequented completely destroyed. Here today, gone tomorrow.

I did this in the other thread, but it was taken down, so here it is again:

Ode to the best damn patio in the world












Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted: Feb 15, 2008, 12:07 PM
staff's Avatar
staff staff is offline
low life in a tall place
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne.AU | Malmö.SE
Posts: 5,478
R.i.p.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted: Feb 15, 2008, 5:32 PM
JDRCRASH's Avatar
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,594
So does this mean they're actually building it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:21 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.