HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Dec 13, 2006, 8:25 AM
James Bond Agent 007's Avatar
James Bond Agent 007 James Bond Agent 007 is online now
Posh
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Seattle-Upon-Rust
Posts: 16,657
Bellevue wants light-rail tunnel through town

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...tlink13e0.html

Wednesday, December 13, 2006
Bellevue wants light-rail tunnel through town
By Ashley Bach
Seattle Times Eastside bureau

While Sound Transit prepares this week to narrow the number of potential routes for an Eastside light-rail line, officials in Bellevue and Redmond are chiming in with their own wish lists for the project.

At the top of Bellevue's list: a tunnel through downtown.

The added expense of a tunnel, though, could mean dropping an extension of the rail line to downtown Redmond, Sound Transit officials said.

Sound Transit won't choose a preferred route for the Eastside extension until 2008, but the board is expected to eliminate some potential routes at its Thursday meeting. Bellevue and Redmond say they want an early say on a project that could affect land use and quality of life into the next century.

"It's incredibly important to do it right," Bellevue Deputy Mayor John Chelminiak said.

Voters next fall will be asked to approve an $11 billion Phase 2 plan for regional light rail that will include an expansion into Snohomish and Pierce counties as well as the Eastside.

In a letter to Sound Transit, the Bellevue City Council advocated a light-rail tunnel through downtown that would start as far south as 112th Avenue Southeast and Bellevue Way Southeast.

Even a shorter tunnel could cost three times as much as an elevated line in the neighborhood. City officials said looking out for residents is their top priority at this point — and expense will be dealt with later.

"Cost is not the issue we are dealing with here," said Councilwoman Claudia Balducci. "We should ask for all the options that we think might happen."

The Sound Transit board will wait until April to decide whether to end the Eastside line near Microsoft or continue to downtown Redmond. Under a proposal being considered by the board, the line would end at Microsoft, at least initially, but design and other planning would be completed for a line into downtown Redmond.

The tunnel would add up to $354 million more to the cost of an 11-mile line from Seattle to downtown Bellevue, according to Sound Transit.

Joel Pfundt, a Redmond principal planner, said both cities are "united" to get light rail to downtown Redmond.

South of downtown Bellevue, city officials want Sound Transit to study routes along 112th, Bellevue Way, 118th Avenue Southeast and the old rail line along Interstate 405. The city also wants to eliminate two of the routes that would cross over the environmentally sensitive Mercer Slough, as well as an elevated line that would travel up Bellevue Way and 112th.

Residents from the neighborhoods south of downtown, such as Surrey Downs and Enatai, have been vocal with their concerns about noise and loss of property; some have pushed for a tunnel that would start as far south as Interstate 90.

In downtown Bellevue, which isn't flat and has little open land, city officials want a tunnel, probably along the length of 108th Avenue — or along Bellevue Way, turning east at Northeast Sixth Street. A third option, winding up 106th Avenue and then Sixth Street, may be too long, some council members said.

The council also doesn't want Sound Transit to consider elevated lines along 112th or 110th avenues, or a surface line along 108th and 110th avenues.

The light rail-trains would run east from downtown, on an elevated line over Interstate 405 and into the Bel-Red Corridor, a 900-acre stretch of aging warehouses and office parks near Bellevue-Redmond Road that the city wants to redevelop.

The council says the rail line there should run primarily along Northeast 16th Street, a corridor the city plans to build, and not along Bellevue-Redmond Road or Highway 520. The line could be elevated or partially elevated, officials said.

In Redmond, city leaders also want a line to run along 16th Street and then into the Overlake neighborhood. In central Redmond, the trains should run along the north edge of Marymoor Park and then turn back into downtown, Pfundt said.

The route would serve commuters in Sammamish and Redmond Ridge, as well as downtown Redmond.

Another potential route through central Redmond, along Bear Creek Parkway, should be eliminated because it doesn't serve downtown and would hurt street traffic, Pfundt said.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Here's a link to a map of the proposed routes:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABP...2003474765.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Dec 13, 2006, 2:53 PM
MrVandelay MrVandelay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Downtown Bellevue
Posts: 487
Map from a couple months ago

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Dec 13, 2006, 3:52 PM
Dr. Smoke's Avatar
Dr. Smoke Dr. Smoke is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 128
Brav-o!

More power to them.
__________________
George the Second, to wounded veterans in the Amputee Care Center of Brooke Army Medical Center, Jan. 1, 2006:
"As you can possibly see, I have an injury myself -- not here at the hospital, but in combat with a cedar. I eventually won. The cedar gave me a little scratch."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Dec 13, 2006, 4:09 PM
OhioGuy OhioGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 6,272
I always prefer the idea of subway over just about any other form of transit, but I wouldn't think the aerial option would be too terribly bad. If nothing else, it would allow riders to enjoy the beautiful views throughout the region. When I was up in Seattle last month, I couldn't help but imagine how great it will be riding the light rail on the aerial portions of the route between the airport and downtown. Subway is preferred, but aerial wouldn't be an awful option either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Dec 13, 2006, 7:02 PM
bgwah's Avatar
bgwah bgwah is offline
TEH KING
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 4,203
I'd rather have a tunnel. And a connection to Redmond. Hmm...
__________________
Favorite Music: Everything except country
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Dec 13, 2006, 7:04 PM
WesTheAngelino's Avatar
WesTheAngelino WesTheAngelino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Washington and Main, Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 2,239
If they want a tunnel in lieu of an el, then pay for it themselves.
__________________
Drop Bush, Not Bombs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Dec 15, 2006, 12:56 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 3,770
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't a "light rail tunnel" actually be more accurately termed a "subway?" I hope they're planning on running trains with more than just two cars on them...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Dec 15, 2006, 5:22 AM
MrVandelay MrVandelay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Downtown Bellevue
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by zilfondel View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't a "light rail tunnel" actually be more accurately termed a "subway?" I hope they're planning on running trains with more than just two cars on them...
I was looking up the wiki on subway vs light rail, and it seems that there really is no clear definition. Light rail seems to be defined more as a cross over between surface, elevated, and underground, while subway tends to refer to systems that are primarily underground only.

I did find a cool link though that shows the mass transit rail systems of the world.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ransit_systems
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Dec 16, 2006, 7:42 PM
sequoias's Avatar
sequoias sequoias is offline
Bellevue in 2006
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Shoreline, WA
Posts: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by zilfondel View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't a "light rail tunnel" actually be more accurately termed a "subway?" I hope they're planning on running trains with more than just two cars on them...
The Sound Transit light rail will handle up to 4 cars that will fit the station's length so it will be 4 cars max with more ridership from Bellevue and University District. For now, it may be 2 or 3 cars long until the future demand of ridership is met.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Dec 17, 2006, 1:12 AM
PaSkyX's Avatar
PaSkyX PaSkyX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Jersey City/上海
Posts: 452
It's light rail because of overhead wiring. Though this is good, the more light rail, the better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Dec 18, 2006, 10:30 AM
mcbaby mcbaby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 558
good for bellevue! seattle too!
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:14 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.