HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Dec 25, 2006, 12:20 AM
SSLL's Avatar
SSLL SSLL is offline
samsonyuen
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canary Wharf->CityPlace
Posts: 4,241
Sao Paolo...billboard ban angers advertisers

From: http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/12/news/brazil.php
______________
Quote:
Billboard ban in São Paulo angers advertisers
By Larry Rohter
Tuesday, December 12, 2006

SÃO PAULO
Imagine a modern metropolis with no outdoor advertising: no billboards, no flashing neon signs, no electronic panels with messages crawling along the bottom.

Come the new year, this city of 11 million, overwhelmed by what the authorities call visual pollution, plans to press the "delete all" button and offer its residents unimpeded views of their surroundings.

But in proposing to transform the landscape, officials have unleashed debate and brought into conflict sharply differing concepts of what this city, South America's largest and most prosperous, should be.

City planners, architects and environmental advocates have argued enthusiastically that the prohibition, through a new "clean city" law, brings São Paulo a welcome step closer to an imagined urban ideal.

The law is "a rare victory of the public interest over private, of order over disorder, aesthetics over ugliness, of cleanliness over trash," Roberto Pompeu de Toledo, a columnist and author of a history of São Paulo, wrote in the weekly newsmagazine Veja. "For once in life, all that is accustomed to coming out on top in Brazil has lost."

But advertising and business groups regard the legislation as injurious to society and an affront to their professions. They say that free expression will be inhibited, jobs will be lost and consumers will have less information on which to base purchasing decisions. They also argue that streets will be less safe at night with the loss of lighting from outdoor advertising.

"This is a radical law that damages the rules of a market economy and respect for the rule of law," said Marcel Solimeo, chief economist of the Commercial Association of São Paulo, which has 32,000 members. "We live in a consumer society and the essence of capitalism is the availability of information about products."

The statute's most visible impact promises to be at eye level and above. The outsized billboards and screens that dominate the skyline, promoting everything from automobiles, jeans and cellphones to banks and sex shops, will have to come down. All other forms of publicity in public spaces, like distribution of fliers, will also stop.

The law also regulates the dimensions of store signs, and will force many well-known companies to reduce them substantially by a formula based on the size of their facades. Another provision, much criticized by owners of transportation companies, outlaws advertising of any kind on the sides of the city's thousands of buses and taxis.

The law, as passed, also applied to advertising banners trailed by airplanes and ads on blimps. But in the first of what promises to be a long series of legal challenges, a court ruled the clause unconstitutional on the grounds that the federal government, not the city, controls airspace.

"What we are aiming for is a complete change of culture," said Roberto Tripoli, president of the City Council and one of the main sponsors of the legislation. "Yes, some people are going to have to pay a price. But things were out of hand and the population has made it clear it wants this."

The law, approved by a vote of 45 to 1 in September, goes into effect on Jan. 1. Opponents complain that the date does not allow enough time for merchants to comply, that fines of up to $4,500 for violations are extreme and that the result will inevitably be a diminishing of urban life — "like New York without Times Square or Tokyo without the Ginza," Solimeo said.

"I think this city is going to become a sadder, duller place," said Dalton Silvano, who cast the sole dissenting vote and is in the advertising business. "Advertising is both an art form and, when you're in your car or alone on foot, a form of entertainment that helps relieve solitude and boredom."

This is not the city's first effort to regulate outdoor advertising. A few years ago it was prohibited in the historic downtown area. But there have been complaints about inspectors taking bribes and advertisers simply flouting the law.

"All our efforts to negotiate have had no effect because none of the accords and agreements we reached with the advertising sector were ever complied with," Mayor Gilberto Kassab said in an interview. "A billboard that was forced to come down would be back up a week later in a different spot. There was a climate of impunity."

Since "it is hard in a city of 11 million to find enough equipment and personnel to determine what was and wasn't legal, we decided to go all the way, to zero things out," Kassab said. "When you prohibit everything, society itself becomes your partner in enforcing the law" and reporting violations.

Popular reaction has largely been supportive.

"I'm in favor of anything that improves the way this city looks, and this law will definitely make things better," said Fernando Gil, 25, a student interviewed on Avenida Paulista, the main street in the heart of the financial district. "All that neon and bright lights, it just doesn't fit here."

Advertising companies generally acknowledge that abuses of public space have occurred and that a majority of the city's estimated 13,000 outdoor billboards have been installed illegally. But they also complain that they are being made scapegoats, and that the real problem lies elsewhere.

"It is not politically correct to talk about the million-plus posters and signs that small businesses and mechanics' shops have up all over the place, because they are poor," said Francesc Petit, a prominent advertising executive who has spoken out against the law. "It's easier to attack McDonald's and Coca-Cola and the banks, because that doesn't offend anybody."

Kassab said that once the situation is under control he hopes to allow limited, strictly regulated advertising at bus stops, newsstands, outdoor street clocks and public bathrooms. But some residents who support the new legislation hope that day never comes, even if it were to profit the city's coffers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Dec 25, 2006, 12:41 AM
jard's Avatar
jard jard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boise
Posts: 2,831
Wow, this is quite the endeavor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Dec 25, 2006, 6:04 AM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 42nd Ward
Posts: 6,377
Absurd.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Dec 26, 2006, 3:16 AM
Urbanguy's Avatar
Urbanguy Urbanguy is online now
Live, laugh, love.
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland | Honolulu
Posts: 5,747
Take em down, that's what i say! Billboards were banned in Honolulu back in the 30s or 40s and the city looks good without them. We live in a world that is surrounded by advertisement, so those advertisers are just going to have to suck it up and find a new outlet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Dec 26, 2006, 3:37 AM
volguus zildrohar's Avatar
volguus zildrohar volguus zildrohar is offline
Be Cool Or Be Cast Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The City Of Philadelphia
Posts: 15,033
" They also argue that streets will be less safe at night with the loss of lighting from outdoor advertising."

That's about as good as it gets right there. My great fear would be the more surreptitious ways advertisers would have to find to get their messages out. We all hate ads but we understand their purpose. Why not just do this around election time?
__________________
je suis phillytrax sur FLICKR, y'all
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Dec 26, 2006, 1:05 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is online now
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,458
I used to hate ad/billboards growing up feeling somehow they were a commercialized indinity forced upon us which led to no aesthic value and in some cases blight as well. I have done pretty much a 180 degree turn since then. Frankly, there are too many blank walls, lots, rather ugly buildings that could use some covering up with creative advertising. Plus they do tend to add contrast and color to the enviroment which more often then not is a good thing. In Chicago for instance I would much rather look at some ads on some subway walls then some stained cracked dilapidated looking concrete. Or would rather see an ad board on some blank concrete/brick wall that lacks windows.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Dec 26, 2006, 1:37 PM
staff's Avatar
staff staff is offline
low life in a tall place
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne.AU | Malmö.SE
Posts: 5,478
Quote:
...with no outdoor advertising: no billboards, no flashing neon signs, no electronic panels with messages crawling along the bottom.
Sounds like Sweden!
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Dec 26, 2006, 1:53 PM
Trantor's Avatar
Trantor Trantor is offline
FUS RO DAH!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Ecumenopolis
Posts: 13,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
...Frankly, there are too many blank walls, lots, rather ugly buildings that could use some covering up with creative advertising. Plus they do tend to add contrast and color to the enviroment which more often then not is a good thing. In Chicago for instance I would much rather look at some ads on some subway walls then some stained cracked dilapidated looking concrete. Or would rather see an ad board on some blank concrete/brick wall that lacks windows.

this is 10.000 times more true to São Paulo than to Chicago!
__________________
________________________________________
Easy, Tychus. This ain´t science fiction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Dec 27, 2006, 3:36 PM
BrighamYen's Avatar
BrighamYen BrighamYen is offline
I ♥ DTLA
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: L.A.
Posts: 6,460
Wow, I thought LA was retarded when it came to this "anti-ads" mentality. I personally wish LA had more "neon, billboards, and glitz" instead of just in Hollywood/West Hollywood. I prefer LA to look more like Tokyo.
__________________
DTLA RISING | With Brigham Yen
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Dec 27, 2006, 4:05 PM
arbeiter's Avatar
arbeiter arbeiter is offline
passion for patterns
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by staff View Post
Sounds like Sweden!
There's a square in Stockholm where all the major local companies have neon signs... similar to the Radhus square in Copenhagen...
__________________
you should know that I'm womanly wise
my website/blog. or, my flickr site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Dec 28, 2006, 4:02 AM
jamesinclair jamesinclair is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 697
"Another provision, much criticized by owners of transportation companies, outlaws advertising of any kind on the sides of the city's thousands of buses and taxis."

Thats just retarded
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Dec 29, 2006, 8:20 PM
passdoubt passdoubt is offline
Boxed in by parking decks
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,659
I'm all about it, but then again I'm a commie, so...
__________________
My city's still breathing, but barely it's true, through buildings gone missing like teeth. The sidewalks are watching me think about you, sparkled with broken glass.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:21 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.