HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 1:51 AM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,752
NAU - Just throwing this out there

North American Union

Just throwing this out there, what are peoples opinions?

Do we want this?
What would be the benefits?
What are the Cons?
Will this end up like NAFTA? Broken promises, failed policies, didn't work the way it was suppost to, etc.
Will there be unofficial classes, where Americans (or Canadians) are held to a higher standard compared to each other plus Mexicians?


"[A] $200-billion North American Investment Fund, is for the purpose of narrowing the income disparity between Mexico, on the one hand, and the U.S. and Canada, on the other. "You need a lot of money to do it and do it effectively," he said. He said Mexico would be required to put up half of the money, with the U.S. contributing 40 percent and Canada 10 percent."

Why would Americans contribute only 4 times as much as us when they have 9-10 times the population? Opinions on that particular quote.




I know NAU has likely been brought up before, but I've never seen it. I'd rather this be a discussion amongst ourselves about it rather than commenting about the article.
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 2:00 AM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 16,327
Bad idea, we are associated with the US too much as it is. We don't really need to group together, as the EU did, just to survive. Maybe in 20 years when China and India become more of an economic powerhouse than they currently are, but for now things are fine the way they are.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 2:16 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam/Rainbow Lake
Posts: 25,426
I think its inevitable that it will happen

the benefits:
being able to retire to a warmer climate
stronger currency when travelling abroad

i really don't think much about it - but I do cross the border a lot as pretty much everything is so much cheaper down there
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 2:22 AM
Archiseek's Avatar
Archiseek Archiseek is offline
http://www.archiseek.com
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dublin / Winnipeg
Posts: 1,369
cue sounds of lots of emigrants buggering off because if they had wanted to emigrate to the great satan, they would have.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 2:33 AM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,752
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
I think its inevitable that it will happen

the benefits:
being able to retire to a warmer climate
stronger currency when travelling abroad

i really don't think much about it - but I do cross the border a lot as pretty much everything is so much cheaper down there
2 questions: why can't you retire down there anyways, and a stronger currency just means less cash at home does it not? and who's to say our currency will become as strong or stronger than the US dollar if we merge?
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 2:49 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam/Rainbow Lake
Posts: 25,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Mind View Post
2 questions: why can't you retire down there anyways, and a stronger currency just means less cash at home does it not? and who's to say our currency will become as strong or stronger than the US dollar if we merge?
cause we can only spend 6 months out of the country before we lose our medical benefits etc.

my parents have many friends who spend the winters down in arizona and spend the summers up here

I guess thats good enough but having to maintain two residences etc...

well i imagine like the European union and the euro we would adopt one common currency and assume it would be as strong as the US dollar thus eliminating the US dollar and the peso and the Canadian dollar

thus we would have a better currency if we were combined as a union the way the euro has become so strong...
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 2:58 AM
Distill3d's Avatar
Distill3d Distill3d is offline
Glorfied Overrated Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver (Burnaby), British Columbia
Posts: 4,151
if it means passport free travel between canada and all other countries involved, i'm in. if it means one currency (AND NOT the US Dollar), lets do it.

a NAU would only work if we follow the EU model. this will not happen because the USA is too proud to allow it to happen.

its a nice dream, but...in the end we're all getting screwwed.
__________________
The Brain: Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?

Pinky: I think so, Brain, but this time, you put the trousers on the chimp.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 3:08 AM
ibz's Avatar
ibz ibz is online now
GT Champion
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,698
I think the biggest question is what would the USA have to gain from such a union? Probably not a whole lot at this point.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 3:26 AM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa-Gatineau
Posts: 9,860
I will never live under the heel of Uncle Sam
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 3:43 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
trespasser
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 33,694
Look at what NAFTA has done for us. Do we want more? I don't.
__________________
Winnipeg: June 2012 + other photos / random things
It's not about what you don't have—it's the little you've got, and how far you can run with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 3:55 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam/Rainbow Lake
Posts: 25,426
I think what the USA would gain is being part of a strong union that compete on the global stage as it slowly loses its position
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 3:56 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
trespasser
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 33,694
The US isn't losing population. They gain every year what Canada has gained in the last Decade.
__________________
Winnipeg: June 2012 + other photos / random things
It's not about what you don't have—it's the little you've got, and how far you can run with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 4:02 AM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 16,327
Position not population
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 4:02 AM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa-Gatineau
Posts: 9,860
I think the question is what would Canada gain from this?

Having such a comparatively small population, how much say would we have in anything? We would lose any ability to control our destiny.
We would become even more complicit in the much reviled American foreign policy, and this would invite the hatred of terrorists.
Would we inherit America's crumbling public education system and social policy?
How long would our medicare last?
Do we really want to become the dog eat dog society the the US is?

Is it worth it just so we can have a bit more spending power and travel to Florida without a passport?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 4:24 AM
Boris2k7's Avatar
Boris2k7 Boris2k7 is offline
Majestic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,193
^ Wow, REACTIONARY!

The matter is not 'if' there is such a union, but 'when,' 'what,' and 'how?'

A full political union is highly unlikely, given the divergence between American and Canadian social policies. More likely it would be a harmonization of some economic and border policies, a common currency, a boost to NORAD and shared defence, etc. We know it is eventually going to happen, what we need to figure out is how we would position ourselves in such a union and what the structure of said union would look like.

I really don't think it is as radical as some people seem to suggest.
__________________
"That's the most passive-aggressive, hall monitor bullshit I've heard yet." -freeweed

Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 4:30 AM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 5,212
Canada would gain nothing from this....

Have you even looked into the negative deficit the USA runs?? One day it's going to crash hard, and I really hate to think so, but if you look at the figures - it's almost inevitable the country is headed for (very) hard times... whether it be in 200 years, or whether it be as quick and hard as what we saw in the dirty 30's (albeit under different conditions).

It's not really a sovereignty issue here - it's an economic issue. Would we want to pear up with such a beast that could one day fall and affect everyone associated with it?

God I sound too way "glass half empty"....

I say, let's stick with what we've created here. We're doing pretty damned good (less the debts we owe), and strive to be better - not amalgamate. We are so closely tied to the country already - we should be heading in the opposite direction.... IMO.
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 4:36 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
trespasser
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 33,694
"God I sound too way "glass half empty".... "

Well, if you're like me, you live in a poor city. In which case, that glass is probably paper. Rip the top third off, and voilà! Cup two-thirds full!

Considering 8-+% of our trade is with America, that crash will effect us either way. Might as well minimize the damage as much as possible.
__________________
Winnipeg: June 2012 + other photos / random things
It's not about what you don't have—it's the little you've got, and how far you can run with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 5:07 AM
malek's Avatar
malek malek is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montréal
Posts: 8,185
you guys bitch at some (one) provinces getting some equalization money, now you're talking about sending some to some other country??

hehehehehe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 5:32 AM
ScottFromCalgary's Avatar
ScottFromCalgary ScottFromCalgary is offline
Calgreedian
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by malek View Post
you guys bitch at some (one) provinces getting some equalization money, now you're talking about sending some to some other country??

hehehehehe
Well at least the states are self sufficient and don't have to subsidize the weaker parts of the country. Sure it creates some massive shit holes, but some parts of the country are as good as it gets.
__________________
"The point is, ladies and gentlemen, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted: Feb 22, 2007, 5:36 AM
ScottFromCalgary's Avatar
ScottFromCalgary ScottFromCalgary is offline
Calgreedian
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Look at what NAFTA has done for us. Do we want more? I don't.
At least NAFTA has helped Alberta by decreasing restrictions on energy exports and trading while allowing us to import cheaper goods from Mexico. It's been pretty much win-win here.
__________________
"The point is, ladies and gentlemen, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind."
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.