HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Jan 3, 2007, 2:39 AM
Guardian Guardian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 14
USA City Security..How do you rate?

AFTER 5 1/2 YEARS, SINCE 911, HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS?

Only 6 of 75 cities get top disaster rating
By DEVLIN BARRETT, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Only six of 75 U.S. metropolitan areas won the highest grades for their emergency agencies' ability to communicate during a disaster, five years after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, according to a federal report obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press.
A draft portion of the report, to be released Wednesday, gives the best ratings to Washington, D.C; San Diego; Minneapolis-St. Paul; Columbus, Ohio; Sioux Falls, S.D.; and Laramie County, Wyo.

The lowest scores went to Chicago; Cleveland; Baton Rouge, La.; Mandan, N.D.; and American Samoa. The report included large and small cities and their suburbs, along with U.S. territories.

In an overview, the report said all 75 areas surveyed have policies in place for helping their emergency workers communicate. But it cautioned that regular testing and exercises are needed "to effectively link disparate systems."

It also said while cooperation among emergency workers is strong, "formalized governance (leadership and planning) across regions has lagged."

The study, conducted by the Homeland Security Department, was likely to add fuel to what looms as a battle in Congress this year. Democrats who take over the majority this week have promised to try fixing the problem emergency agencies have communicating with each other but have not said specifically what they will do, how much it will cost or how they will pay for it

"Five years after 9/11, we continue to turn a deaf ear to gaps in interoperable communications," — the term used for emergency agencies' abilities to talk to each other, said Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record), D-N.Y. "If it didn't have such potentially devastating consequences, it would be laughable."

Homeland Security spokesman Russ Knocke would not comment on the report, saying only that in releasing it on Wednesday, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff will "talk about nationwide assessments for interoperable communications."

The attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, revealed major problems in how well emergency agencies were able to talk to each other during a catastrophe. Many firefighters climbing the World Trade Center towers died when they were unable to hear police radio warnings to leave the crumbling buildings.

In New York now, the report said, first responders were found to have well-established systems to communicate among each other — but not the best possible. Thirteen U.S. cities scored better than New York.

Just over a year ago, Hurricane Katrina underscored communication problems when radio transmissions were hindered because the storm's winds toppled towers.

A separate report the Homeland Security Department released last month found that emergency workers from different agencies are capable of talking to each other in two-thirds of 6,800 U.S. communities surveyed.

But David Boyd, who heads the Homeland Security office that conducted the study, said in an interview that only about 10 percent of them have systems so fully developed that they can communicate with them routinely. That survey did not name the cities that provided data.

In the study to be released on Wednesday, communities were judged in three categories: operating procedures in place, use of communications systems and how effectively local governments have coordinated in preparation for a disaster.

Overall, 16 percent of the communities were given the highest score for the communications procedures they have in place and 1 percent got the lowest rating.

Nineteen percent got the top grade for their plans for coordinating during a disaster and 8 percent received the worst; and 21 percent got the best mark for how well they use their communications equipment while 4 percent got the bottom rating.

Most of the areas surveyed included cities and their surrounding communities, based on the assumption that in a major crisis emergency personnel from all local jurisdictions would respond.

Los Angeles got advanced grades in procedures and use of emergency communications systems and a well-developed grade in coordination of governance.

San Francisco, by comparison, received intermediate grades in governance and procedures, and a well-developed grade in use of systems.

Since the Sept. 11 attacks, $2.9 billion in federal grant money has been distributed to state and local first responders for the improvement of their emergency communications systems.

Congress has ordered that the television broadcast industry vacate a portion of the radio spectrum to make it available for public safety communications. Lawmakers have also created a new office at the Homeland Security Department to oversee the issue, though they have yet to provide money for it.

The areas with the six best scores were judged advanced in all three categories. The cities with the lowest grades had reached the early implementation stage for only one category, and intermediate levels for the other two categories.

Chicago, Cleveland and Baton Rouge, for example, were judged to have accomplished the early stage of government coordination. Mandan, N.D., and the territory of American Samoa were both found to have gotten to the early stage of their actual usage of interoperable emergency communications and rated intermediate in governance and procedures.

Tammy Lapp, the emergency coordinator for Mandan and Morton County, N.D., said she was not surprised by the low ranking.

"We knew with our limited funds, we were going to fall short," she said.
___

Associated Press writer Beverley Lumpkin contributed to this report.
___
On the Net: Report can be downloaded at:

(The below link report shows grading, ie, Full Circle, 3/4 Circle, 1/2 Circle, 1/4 Circle, Empty Circle).

http://wid.ap.org/documents/dhs.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Jan 3, 2007, 2:53 AM
Rise To The Top Rise To The Top is offline
We can kiss the sky! - MC
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV/ Lincoln, NH
Posts: 575
no suprise about LA, but im suprised taht NY hasent gotten better with this stuff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Jan 3, 2007, 2:55 AM
bmfarley's Avatar
bmfarley bmfarley is offline
Long-Time Californian
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California; All Over
Posts: 1,269
I have mixed feelings on this.

One, the general population will clamor for improvements in this thing or that. But when it comes to paying for it through necessary taxes, they fold. ...for the most part.

Two, natural disasters occur. Terrorism occurs. There's little that can be done to prepare for them.

In the end, what's needed is better leadership.
__________________
- Think Big, Go Big. Think small, stay small.
- Don't get sucked into a rabbit's hole.
- Freeways build sprawl. Transit builds cities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Jan 3, 2007, 3:04 AM
MayorOfChicago's Avatar
MayorOfChicago MayorOfChicago is offline
You had me at herro...
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lakeview, Chicago
Posts: 1,775
every disaster is so completely different, or has the possibility of being different. I don't really a ton of attention to these things when the variety of things that could go wrong are SO diverse. I think I just have an overly optimistic view in my mind how well our cities are prepared communication wise for a meltdown of normal life. It happens SO rarely in this country I don't think anyone can be totally prepared - people have no clue what it's really like in 95% of the cases of our cities.
__________________
So I was out biking with Jesus last week...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Jan 3, 2007, 4:00 AM
ColDayMan's Avatar
ColDayMan ColDayMan is offline
B!tchslapping Since 1998
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cincinnati-Dayton-Columbus
Posts: 18,549
I understand Columbus as it has the DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER but Cleveland? Tsk tsk.
__________________
Click the x: _ _ X _ _!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Jan 3, 2007, 4:47 AM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is online now
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 9,810
Good to see that Sioux Falls and Cheyenne are fully prepared, must be that disproportionant amount of funds going to those low-profile districts that Homeland Security has deemed vital for some god-known reason.

Sheer idiocy.
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Jan 3, 2007, 5:18 AM
BnaBreaker's Avatar
BnaBreaker BnaBreaker is online now
Y GWIR ERBYN Y BYD
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago & South Bend
Posts: 14,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr View Post
Good to see that Sioux Falls and Cheyenne are fully prepared, must be that disproportionant amount of funds going to those low-profile districts that Homeland Security has deemed vital for some god-known reason.

Sheer idiocy.
They're Republican cities. That's why they're important.
__________________
"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery. None but ourselves can free our minds."

-Bob Marley
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2007, 4:15 AM
Derek's Avatar
Derek Derek is online now
Rip City Bi+ch.
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 7,716
i guess its cool to know SD is pretty safe...
__________________
Portlandia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2007, 4:33 AM
adam-machiavelli adam-machiavelli is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 847
If North Dakota were to secede from the USA right now, it would be the world's most nuclear armed country relative to its size.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2007, 8:31 AM
passdoubt passdoubt is offline
Boxed in by parking decks
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,659
I aint afraida terrists.
__________________
My city's still breathing, but barely it's true, through buildings gone missing like teeth. The sidewalks are watching me think about you, sparkled with broken glass.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2007, 9:45 AM
Brandon716 Brandon716 is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buffalo-Niagara Region
Posts: 17,294
We're not prepared to prevent another attack, but we're okay with dealing with the aftermath as best as we can in my opinion.

Neither political party can offer blanket protection against a future terrorist attack. All we can do is try the best we can and be prepared with first responders as if an attack is imminent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Jan 7, 2007, 12:09 AM
AZheat's Avatar
AZheat AZheat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nashville, Tn
Posts: 2,163
It really isn't possible to prepare for every conceivable scenario so we've tried to cover some of the obvious ones and of course the airline industry since we've already been attacked using airplanes. Any place where large numbers of people are concentrated in one area is a potential target like open football stadiums, racecar tracks, etc. but there's so many possible ways that terrorists could find vulnerabilities and exploit them that our best course of action is to be fully prepared for dealing with mass casualties after we've been attacked. Much of the spending we hear about for unlikely targets probably is a waste of money but I honestly don't fault anyone for trying to protect those places. The really worrisome threat is the possibility of getting in a nuclear device into one of our ports or maybe a biological weapon. I'm afraid that we will get hit sooner or later no matter how hard we try to defend ourselves.
__________________
"If this is a blessing, it is certainly very well disguised" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: Jan 7, 2007, 1:54 AM
brian_b brian_b is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,213
There was an article in the paper containing the lead Chicago guys response to these ratings.

He was furious about it, and said he was demanding an explanation from DHS. Apparently, the DHS evaluators were in Chicago for a few hours, viewed part of an emergency drill, said "looks good" and then left.

If this is true, then more cities probably had the same poor (non existent?) evaluations and thus the ratings are highly suspect.

found the link:
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/1...emer04.article
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:28 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.