HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Jan 4, 2007, 6:04 AM
urbanflyer's Avatar
urbanflyer urbanflyer is offline
Ku`u Lei
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 名古屋
Posts: 6,373
Thumbs up Nagoya's Bus Rapid Transit

A few pics from the Shindeki-machi line







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Jan 4, 2007, 6:20 AM
J Church J Church is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 12,882
Is that an O-Bahn?
__________________
San Francisco Cityscape
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Jan 4, 2007, 2:26 PM
Justin10000 Justin10000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 813
IT has to be.

I would feel sorry for the driver who has to negioate that with any kind of mechnical help.

Looks awesome though. I like seeing TRUE BRT systems, and not the sorry excuses that we have in North America(ecpet Ottawa, of course).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Jan 4, 2007, 2:53 PM
orulz orulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 400
Japan builds heavy infrastructure like nowhere else in the world. No matter what they built, function comes first, cost and aesthetics are considered later. I wish things could be built like that in the US...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Jan 4, 2007, 5:35 PM
J Church J Church is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 12,882
You know, Nagoya is like a transit junkie's playpen. There are all the usual modes, of course, but how many O-Bahns are there in existence worldwide? And it has just one of two commercially operating maglevs.
__________________
San Francisco Cityscape
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Jan 4, 2007, 5:53 PM
Justin10000 Justin10000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 813
More pics?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Jan 4, 2007, 10:28 PM
urbanflyer's Avatar
urbanflyer urbanflyer is offline
Ku`u Lei
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 名古屋
Posts: 6,373
sorry, couldn't find other pics. but I'll be taking my first ride on the line in the coming weeks. I only just recently found out about it when looking at a revised city bus map. For whatever reason it had been mapped seperately until they decided to include all bus services on the base map.

This example is the only one I know of other than the original one in Adelaide.

this article has some interesting comments on how farebox recovery has fared with these expensive projects in spite of the recently-ended Japanese recession

http://www.apta.com/services/intnatl.../asiastudy.cfm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Jan 4, 2007, 10:41 PM
J Church J Church is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 12,882
A case in point is the balance sheet of Tokyo’s major metrorail system, the TRTA, known popularly as the Eidan, which carries about 5.7 million passengers each day and last year achieved a little more than $100 million in revenues above expenditures after tax and debt service [emphasis mine]. This puts Eidan into an exclusive handful of subway systems around the globe that earn considerably more than they spend.

And that's not even charging Shinkansen fares. Just an ordinary urban Metro. If you could put it in a bottle ...
__________________
San Francisco Cityscape
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Jan 4, 2007, 11:15 PM
Deez's Avatar
Deez Deez is offline
you know my steez
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto/Ottawa
Posts: 1,397
Question: If you going to make the expense of what looks like a lot of grade separation, why not go with rail? Especially if the busses are automated? I'm not familiar with the area so I don't know what the demand level is like...all I know is that the Japanese are not usually ones to skimp out on big capital expenditures.

(Aside: Someone may point out that Ottawa's system has grade separation, but in actuality the distance over which this is true is actually quite small compared to the size of the whole Transitway.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2007, 2:39 AM
DenverTrans's Avatar
DenverTrans DenverTrans is offline
- - - - - - - - - - - ->>
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by orulz View Post
Japan builds heavy infrastructure like nowhere else in the world. No matter what they built, function comes first, cost and aesthetics are considered later. I wish things could be built like that in the US...
Maybe they care about aesthetics --


Maybe they just built a lot of things when aesthetic fashions were, uh, different.

As a culture, though, they have an incredible aesthetic tradition:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2007, 4:15 PM
martarider's Avatar
martarider martarider is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 540
Cool. So is "O-bahn" a generic term for any guided busway? For whatever reason I'd always associated that specifically with the system in Adelaide.

Anyway there are several similar systems in Europe too, UK and Germany in particular.

This one in Essen is very "green" compared to others, w/ grass planted down the middle of the guideway:



And this one in Mannheim appears to share at least a section of its ROW w/ steel-wheel trams:



Unfortunately its hard to find much info about these systems online beyond scattered photos like this, at least not in English.
__________________
Support your local transit advocacy organization
In Atlanta: Citizens for Progressive Transit | Other Cities
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2007, 4:54 PM
J Church J Church is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 12,882
Are they that common? I thought there might be one or two in Germany but I'd never heard of any in the UK.

My understanding is that any busway guided by rollers and not optics is an O-Bahn. I believe German engineers consulted on the design of the Adelaide system, the original, and that's where the name came from (though I could be wrong).
__________________
San Francisco Cityscape
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2007, 5:02 PM
G-Man's Avatar
G-Man G-Man is offline
It's all about the view!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,311
So is there a financial benefit to this. I mean isn't the main cost of a guideway system the guideway not the technology used?
__________________
Check out Vibrant Victoria
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2007, 5:31 PM
Justin10000 Justin10000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by martarider View Post
Cool. So is "O-bahn" a generic term for any guided busway? For whatever reason I'd always associated that specifically with the system in Adelaide.

Anyway there are several similar systems in Europe too, UK and Germany in particular.

This one in Essen is very "green" compared to others, w/ grass planted down the middle of the guideway:



And this one in Mannheim appears to share at least a section of its ROW w/ steel-wheel trams:



Unfortunately its hard to find much info about these systems online beyond scattered photos like this, at least not in English.
I prefer "Guided Bus" to be honest. But O-bahn can is a good coin-term.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2007, 5:46 PM
orulz orulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverTrans View Post
Maybe they care about aesthetics --
True, my statement was too general and sweeping. But then again, look at the station around the train. Completely utilitarian; no unnecessary frills or adornments. Pleasant, clean, bright, and open, but above all it's practical, useful, and safe.

As much as I appreciate mind-bogglingly awesome architecture in transit stations, sometimes letting a transit station just be a transit station and nothing more can be a work of art by itself (and could save more than a few million dollars in the process!) Particularly in the US where money for transit is extremely tight, spending money on radical station designs by famous architects would seems superfluous.

Last edited by orulz; Jan 5, 2007 at 6:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2007, 6:40 PM
martarider's Avatar
martarider martarider is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 540
Just noticed Wikipedia has a pretty good writeup on guided bus systems:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guided_bus

Regarding such systems in the UK:

Quote:
A number of guided busways currently operate in the United Kingdom. They are at:

* Ipswich (Kesgrave) - opened in 1995
* Leeds (A61 Scott Hall Road) - opened in 1995
* Leeds (A64 York Road and A63 Selby Road) - opened in 2001
* Bradford (A641 Manchester Road) - opened in October 2001.
* Crawley (Southgate Avenue) - opened in August 2003.
* Crawley (London Road) - opened in December 2004.
* Edinburgh (Fastlink - Stenhouse to Broomhouse) - opened in December 2004.
Definitely more than I expected. And there is another one u/c right now in Cambridge, for which there is actually extensive online info:

http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/transport/guided/

BTW, also from that wiki article, it appears the shared tram/guided-bus setup in Mannheim pictured above was only temporary:

Quote:
In Mannheim, Germany from May 1992 to September 2005 a guided busway shared the tram alignment for a few hundred meters, which allowed buses to avoid a congested stretch of road in a location where there was no space for an extra traffic lane. It was discontinued as the majority of buses fitted with guide wheels were withdrawn for age reasons. There are no plans to convert newer buses.
Too bad... that would have been fun to see.
__________________
Support your local transit advocacy organization
In Atlanta: Citizens for Progressive Transit | Other Cities
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted: Jan 6, 2007, 12:30 AM
Lee_Haber8 Lee_Haber8 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 757
If guided-bus is done properly, the quality of ride can be equal to that of light-rail. Because it is mechanically guided in a steel track the ride can be as smooth as rail and buses can stop in a much shorter distance. The advantage of bus-rail over light rail in certain cases is that buses at the end of the guideway can get off and serve other destinations. The disadvantages of guided-bus are it has yet to be proven to work in winter climates and capacity (though this is somewhat compensated by the fact that the buses can run more frequently).
__________________
www.winnipegrapidtransit.ca
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted: Jan 6, 2007, 1:03 AM
miketoronto miketoronto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,249
There is a difference though between guided bus and o-bahn.

Guided busways like the ones in England, are not the same as the o-bahn, which has special tracks for the buses, and special little wheels, etc on the bus.

The English Guided busways just use computer tech to keep the buses in a certain lane on the road, or on a busway that does not have the same kind of features a o-bahn bus has.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted: Jan 6, 2007, 1:10 AM
Jared's Avatar
Jared Jared is offline
senior something
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverTrans View Post
Maybe they care about aesthetics --


Maybe they just built a lot of things when aesthetic fashions were, uh, different.
Um, the Skinkansen's sleekness has far more to do with making it aerodynamic in order to minimize air resistance than it does with "looking cool/futuristic".
__________________
My Diagrams My Photos

I'm not the guy from Subway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted: Jan 6, 2007, 1:38 AM
urbanflyer's Avatar
urbanflyer urbanflyer is offline
Ku`u Lei
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 名古屋
Posts: 6,373
^
that said, the coolness factor is a welcome result
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:58 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.