Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web. The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics. SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.
-- No, the last thing we need is some paternalist weighing whether we are sufficiently noncontroversial to be admitted to subsidized quarters in a Utopian dream city. -- Jane Jacobs
Like the "shallow depth-of-field" contest, this one was maddening for me, because I have taken many pictures that would fit the theme well. I'm not saying which entry is mine, but I ended up going with a picture that I actually took since the contest was announced.
I went with 10. Not only is the landscape unusual for me but yea the big tire just sitting there is borderline strange. It would be funny if there was a huge tire junkyard just out of the picture tho
Then Again I have to edit my post cuz it is also unusual how scale is completely taken out of this picture. I'm thinking the tire is huge but it may be a regular ole car tire, that is if it's a tire at all. hmmm.
T-minus twelve hours and it's a nail biter. Who will win? 'Disturbing Lego-like guys' or 'Can you help me with my shirt?'? The suspense is killing me, but not in a killing me for pie kind of way.
-- No, the last thing we need is some paternalist weighing whether we are sufficiently noncontroversial to be admitted to subsidized quarters in a Utopian dream city. -- Jane Jacobs
-- No, the last thing we need is some paternalist weighing whether we are sufficiently noncontroversial to be admitted to subsidized quarters in a Utopian dream city. -- Jane Jacobs