Calgary Stoney Trail [Ring Road] - Page 190

Mazrim · #**3781** Posted: **Jul 19, 2012, 6:15 PM**

It's worth noting that it's the second Henday section that got the flythrough treatment, but for whatever reason it wasn't a requirement for the SE portion in Calgary. These days with the proliferation of 3D models used for designing large scale projects like this, it's much easier to make these flythroughs than just a few years ago. They aren't going to pump these out as a favor for the government though. It's still pretty time consuming to put together.

5seconds · #**3782** Posted: **Jul 19, 2012, 10:21 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mazrim

It's worth noting that it's the second Henday section that got the flythrough treatment, but for whatever reason it wasn't a requirement for the SE portion in Calgary. These days with the proliferation of 3D models used for designing large scale projects like this, it's much easier to make these flythroughs than just a few years ago. They aren't going to pump these out as a favor for the government though. It's still pretty time consuming to put together.

I wonder if the government would do this for the SW portion, as a tool to help sell it to the Tsuu T'ina. I know that the terms of the agreement was the sticking point with the deal, but it might help convince some people.

Cage · #**3783** Posted: **Jul 20, 2012, 3:32 PM**

Perhaps the forum can help me out. Does anyone have insight into when the Stoney Trail / Nose Hill Drive detour route will be implemented?

Here is a diagram of the detour route:
http://www.transportation.alberta.ca...n/stnhd-m2.pdf

Basically the detour is meant to take out the intersection and have the intersection become only a right lane in or out. My original understand was the detour would be implemented this past spring. However there appears to be a lot of feet dragging getting the detour route operating.

The Stoney/NHD intersection is becoming a major bottle neck, especially on Thursday and Friday afternoon rushhours (when every camper van and 5th wheel east of Cochrane and west of Manitoba is going to the mountains. Southbound Stoney backs up to Scenic Acres intersection and Northbound Stoney backs up to hwy 1.

yyc_engineer · #**3784** Posted: **Jul 20, 2012, 4:16 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cage

Perhaps the forum can help me out. Does anyone have insight into when the Stoney Trail / Nose Hill Drive detour route will be implemented?

Here is a diagram of the detour route:
http://www.transportation.alberta.ca...n/stnhd-m2.pdf

Basically the detour is meant to take out the intersection and have the intersection become only a right lane in or out. My original understand was the detour would be implemented this past spring. However there appears to be a lot of feet dragging getting the detour route operating.

The Stoney/NHD intersection is becoming a major bottle neck, especially on Thursday and Friday afternoon rushhours (when every camper van and 5th wheel east of Cochrane and west of Manitoba is going to the mountains. Southbound Stoney backs up to Scenic Acres intersection and Northbound Stoney backs up to hwy 1.

Target is early August.

source: I work on the project.

freeweed · #**3785** Posted: **Jul 20, 2012, 4:38 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by yyc_engineer

Target is early August.

source: I work on the project.

Good luck. Drove through yesterday and I'd be surprised if we see it before end of September. Please prove me wrong.

Cage · #**3786** Posted: **Jul 20, 2012, 6:48 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by yyc_engineer

Target is early August.

source: I work on the project.

Thanks for the info!

You Need A Thneed · #**3787** Posted: **Jul 23, 2012, 8:00 PM**

Girder Erection at 22x/52nd Street Today.

Tropics · #**3788** Posted: **Jul 23, 2012, 9:46 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by yyc_engineer

Target is early August.

source: I work on the project.

Awesome change, those lights are a real bottleneck during rush hours.

You Need A Thneed · #**3789** Posted: **Jul 31, 2012, 5:26 PM**

It appears that the 22x will be rerouted under the 88th Street interchange any day now.

mersar · #**3790** Posted: **Jul 31, 2012, 5:43 PM**

The detour road for the Nosehill interchange looks like its getting near completion. Still haven't paved the widened part of 87th Street though. Quite a bit of earth moving going on, including what I assume is a wildlife passage culvert under the SB to WB off ramp.

Seadood · #**3791** Posted: **Jul 31, 2012, 6:24 PM**

Is there bridge widening planned for the Bow bridges on 22X? There's another 8 months chewed up with that.

mersar · #**3792** Posted: **Jul 31, 2012, 6:49 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seadood

Is there bridge widening planned for the Bow bridges on 22X? There's another 8 months chewed up with that.

Nope, I believe both bridges are adequate for the current phase of the ring road (the northern bridge is only a few years old and was pretty much built to the spec needed)

You Need A Thneed · #**3793** Posted: **Jul 31, 2012, 8:33 PM**

The bridge over the Bow will lose it's pedestrian accommodation I believe.

Seadood · #**3794** Posted: **Jul 31, 2012, 9:25 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by mersar

Nope, I believe both bridges are adequate for the current phase of the ring road (the northern bridge is only a few years old and was pretty much built to the spec needed)

I can see a bottleneck there. Lanes ending before the bridge (from Cranston/McKenzie) only to reappear on the other side (Chapparel).

mersar · #**3795** Posted: **Jul 31, 2012, 10:22 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Need A Thneed

The bridge over the Bow will lose it's pedestrian accommodation I believe.

You are partially right. The plan is the west bound bridge loses its pedestrian walkway to give three traffic lanes, and only the pedestrian walkway on the eastbound bridge is left (see page 68 of the schedule 18 PDF)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seadood

I can see a bottleneck there. Lanes ending before the bridge (from Cranston/McKenzie) only to reappear on the other side (Chapparel).

Nope, see above

lubicon · #**3796** Posted: **Aug 2, 2012, 6:15 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by mersar

Wasn't the very initial section just Crowchild to Scenic Acres Gate for a short while? I seem to recall driving down it once and that was the end.

Correct (sort of), actually it didnt even go as far south as the current Tuscany interchange is now as the entrance to Tuscany was roughly where the pedestrian bridge is now and the road ended at that point. When I moved to Tuscany in May 1997 that was the only section that was open. I don't recall when the extension down to the TCH opened but I seem to recall it not being for awhile after I moved in. So I would hazard a guess and say that portion did not open until late 1997 at the very earliest. At that point it was single lane southbound and 2 lanes northbound until you got to the bottom of the hill.

tmjr · #**3797** Posted: **Aug 6, 2012, 7:10 PM**

Does anyone know if landscaping at Crow/Stoney is finished, or is there more work planned?

You Need A Thneed · #**3798** Posted: **Aug 7, 2012, 4:16 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Need A Thneed

It appears that the 22x will be rerouted under the 88th Street interchange any day now.

The 22x is realigned this morning. Is this the first realignment onto the permanent roadway for the SE ring road?

mersar · #**3799** Posted: **Aug 7, 2012, 7:00 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Need A Thneed

The 22x is realigned this morning. Is this the first realignment onto the permanent roadway for the SE ring road?

I believe so, at least for the mainline alignment and not counting any ramps.

lubicon · #**3800** Posted: **Aug 8, 2012, 7:28 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmjr

Does anyone know if landscaping at Crow/Stoney is finished, or is there more work planned?

I certainly hope they are not finished as it is still mostly dirt. Doesn't even look like grass seed has been sprayed yet.