HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction

    

The Leadenhall Building in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • London Skyscraper Diagram
London Projects & Construction Forum
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted: May 13, 2008, 5:43 PM
Fabb's Avatar
Fabb Fabb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 8,990
Those demolition photos are fun to watch.
Thanks for the update !
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted: May 13, 2008, 5:55 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vs;hstu
Posts: 12,571
Nice to see this one moving along. London is really getting some great stuff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted: Jun 14, 2008, 1:01 PM
wjfox2004's Avatar
wjfox2004 wjfox2004 is offline
FutureTimeline.net
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,231
New rendering from the south. Includes the neighbouring Bishopsgate Tower to its left.



__________________
http://www.FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2008, 5:54 AM
Bokimon's Avatar
Bokimon Bokimon is offline
Master and Commander
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CALGARY
Posts: 1,474
^Spectacular London!!!

I love both buildings, fantastic additions to the skyline.
__________________
Second Building Boom Imminent..
Only in Calgary can one be a Skyscraper nerdlinger for life!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted: Jun 24, 2008, 8:06 PM
wjfox2004's Avatar
wjfox2004 wjfox2004 is offline
FutureTimeline.net
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,231
The box is finally coming down. Picture by JohnB of SkyscraperCity.com:


__________________
http://www.FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted: Jul 4, 2008, 7:43 AM
Gregorius's Avatar
Gregorius Gregorius is offline
Maui Built
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maui/Los Angeles
Posts: 119
Wow, Canary Warf's got company.

On a slightly unrelated note, what is the name of the 4th tall building from the left in that render? You can't tell from the picture but its glassy and has a slightly flared top. I spent a few months in London and was always curious about that one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 10:36 AM
wjfox2004's Avatar
wjfox2004 wjfox2004 is offline
FutureTimeline.net
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,231
A picture of the site, with basement works getting underway (taken by LONDON_STAR of SkyscraperCity) :


__________________
http://www.FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 10:41 AM
wjfox2004's Avatar
wjfox2004 wjfox2004 is offline
FutureTimeline.net
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregorius View Post

On a slightly unrelated note, what is the name of the 4th tall building from the left in that render? You can't tell from the picture but its glassy and has a slightly flared top. I spent a few months in London and was always curious about that one.
I think you mean Citypoint. Formerly the headquarters of British Petroleum.


__________________
http://www.FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 8:13 PM
neverdone's Avatar
neverdone neverdone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 172
They are retaining part of the old building's core?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 8:47 PM
America 117 America 117 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 613
its nice to see a great city like londen is booming!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 9:23 PM
wjfox2004's Avatar
wjfox2004 wjfox2004 is offline
FutureTimeline.net
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by neverdone View Post
They are retaining part of the old building's core?
No. Basically, demolition (of the old building) and construction (of the new building) are happening simultaneously. The old core is being taken down, and the space around it is being prepared for the basement floors, piling, etc. It saves time I guess.
__________________
http://www.FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted: Jul 12, 2008, 9:28 PM
wjfox2004's Avatar
wjfox2004 wjfox2004 is offline
FutureTimeline.net
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by America 117 View Post
its nice to see a great city like londen is booming!!
Indeed. Prior to 1999, the only skyscrapers in London were Tower 42 and Canary Wharf's main tower. In the last decade, a further 8 skyscrapers have been built, and between now and 2015 there could be a further 40 skyscrapers built (including two buildings over 950 ft).
__________________
http://www.FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted: Jul 22, 2008, 2:38 AM
cityguy's Avatar
cityguy cityguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ottawa
Posts: 583
I don't think we'll see 40 new skyscrapers built in the next few years if property values keep dropping,like they have been for the last few months.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted: Jul 22, 2008, 8:10 AM
Gregorius's Avatar
Gregorius Gregorius is offline
Maui Built
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maui/Los Angeles
Posts: 119
Thanks wfjox, thats exactly the building I meant. I kept thinking it could be Centre Point, but it looked a little too nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted: Aug 6, 2008, 9:08 AM
wjfox2004's Avatar
wjfox2004 wjfox2004 is offline
FutureTimeline.net
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,231
Steelwork of the old building is completely gone; just the core remaining now. This should be gone by mid-September apparently. Then proper basement construction will follow. The new tower should finally begin rising in December/January. Photo by JohnB of SkyscraperCity -


__________________
http://www.FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted: Aug 6, 2008, 3:47 PM
Lecom's Avatar
Lecom Lecom is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 12,497
It's nice to see that Rogers is putting up a new masterpiece right next to his earlier classic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted: Aug 7, 2008, 5:21 AM
chex's Avatar
chex chex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: gdl/ldn/ny
Posts: 2,434
i dont get it how they are tiring it down from the base to the top... why?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted: Aug 7, 2008, 6:40 AM
FrancoRey's Avatar
FrancoRey FrancoRey is offline
Stay Thirsty.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Shanghai, China 中国上海
Posts: 2,770
I absolutely love this building. A favorite of mine, no doubt. All of the new building proposals in the City are simply stunning. Shard, Bishopsgate, I am jealous.

Does anyone know the anticipated cost to build this tower? Wjfox?
__________________
Denver's getting infill like it's 1999...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted: Aug 8, 2008, 9:39 AM
wjfox2004's Avatar
wjfox2004 wjfox2004 is offline
FutureTimeline.net
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,231
Scaffolding rising this morning. From the web cam:

__________________
http://www.FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted: Aug 8, 2008, 9:53 AM
wjfox2004's Avatar
wjfox2004 wjfox2004 is offline
FutureTimeline.net
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by chex View Post
i dont get it how they are tiring [sic] it down from the base to the top... why?
The old building utilized a rare type of structural engineering - it was "hung" from, and supported by, the top floor. If they had demolished the top floor first, the whole thing would have collapsed.


Quote:
Originally Posted by FrancoRey View Post
I absolutely love this building. A favorite of mine, no doubt. All of the new building proposals in the City are simply stunning. Shard, Bishopsgate, I am jealous.
It's a shame English Heritage don't agree with you. These towers have faced incredible opposition.


Quote:
Originally Posted by chex View Post
Does anyone know the anticipated cost to build this tower? Wjfox?
£286m...

http://www.skyscrapernews.com/news.php?ref=939

(or about USD $570m)
__________________
http://www.FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:31 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.