NEW YORK | 175 Greenwich St. | 1,170' Pinnacle / 1,080' Roof | 80 FLOORS - Page 137

drumz0rz · #**2721** Posted: **Jul 21, 2012, 9:47 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rail>Auto

What is that orange stuff on some of the steel?

Iron-Oxide aka Rust. It's what happens when the steel comes in contact with the air (accelerated by water).

pnapp1 · #**2722** Posted: **Jul 23, 2012, 7:55 PM**

The West sides outer columns have gone up today.

Look closely as they are hard to see in the photo because they are grey.

babybackribs2314 · #**2723** Posted: **Jul 23, 2012, 8:03 PM**

I'm crossing my fingers this rises without a hitch. Haven't they completed the core beyond the podium at this point?

Davidsam52 · #**2724** Posted: **Jul 23, 2012, 10:19 PM**

Yes great to see, and now is this thing gonna rise unimpeeded? Please, someone official let us know!

MrSlippery519 · #**2725** Posted: **Jul 24, 2012, 1:23 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by babybackribs2314

I'm crossing my fingers this rises without a hitch. Haven't they completed the core beyond the podium at this point?

Looks to me that they are in fact beyond the 7 floor podium now. If you look at the KPI cam you can see over the past week the back half is rising above the podium.

jthornton17 · #**2726** Posted: **Jul 25, 2012, 8:49 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrSlippery519

Looks to me that they are in fact beyond the 7 floor podium now. If you look at the KPI cam you can see over the past week the back half is rising above the podium.

I thought maybe they were waiting to make it official on the day of or after the topping out of 1 WTC. I know the company making the steel for 3 wtc or 175 greenwich said it was a full go. The way things are looking is great. It will be fun to see another tower going up, as 1 and 4 come to a close.

chris123678 · #**2727** Posted: **Jul 25, 2012, 9:20 PM**

Bad News-
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...788560162.html

TechTalkGuy · #**2728** Posted: **Jul 25, 2012, 10:34 PM**

I hope a lead tenant can be found soon.

Onn · #**2729** Posted: **Jul 25, 2012, 10:37 PM**

It's pitiful that businesses don't want to lend a hand in helping rebuild the WTC site. They have more money than anyone else does right now.

Dac150 · #**2730** Posted: **Jul 25, 2012, 11:21 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris123678

Bad News-
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...788560162.html

Not 'bad' news at all, just the same news we've known since 2010. The firm is fully committed to seeing the project through, however is constrained from doing so until the minimum leasing requirements are met. Nothing new here - however if the speculation from a few weeks ago was bought into, I can 'understand' the disappointment.

Don098 · #**2731** Posted: **Jul 25, 2012, 11:55 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris123678

Bad News-
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...788560162.html

Horrible news, but I hate to say I told ya so. They need a tenant before proceeding. The "full go" was incorrect as I thought.

uaarkson · #**2732** Posted: **Jul 26, 2012, 12:22 AM**

More like old news. Come on, people. Can we not freak out every time someone remembers what's going on here? It's getting old.

Zapatan · #**2733** Posted: **Jul 26, 2012, 12:46 AM**

Yea... it still sucks to have the bad news repetitively shoved down our throats though...

JayPro · #**2734** Posted: **Jul 26, 2012, 2:06 AM**

Sure, but if you *know* that another of these monotonous false alarms is coming, you don't have to stick around and open your mouth for ppl to shove it down your throat in the first place. That's what's known in technical jargon as "gluttony for punishment".
Why can't some folks just either walk away whenever the temptation to rise to the bait presents itself, or just man up and wait for something positive to happen?

chris123678 · #**2735** Posted: **Jul 26, 2012, 3:42 AM**

I refered to this article as bad news because there were rumors going around saying it could continue.

Yackemflaber69 · #**2736** Posted: **Jul 26, 2012, 6:56 PM**

cant wait for this to rise

FMIII · #**2737** Posted: **Jul 26, 2012, 10:59 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris123678

I refered to this article as bad news because there were rumors going around saying it could continue.

With the Hudson Yards towers awaiting, I am afraid Silverstein and the PA will even find it harder to look for tenants for the whole site. So if they wait for a tenant, they won't build it any time soon...

However, as they say : "There is no smoke without fire". This rumor must have a part of truth.

When you simply take into account the fact that they have already spent a huge amount of money on this project, I can not imagine a single second that they could cap it at eight floors. There are a lot of materials awaiting somewhere in a wharehouse ready to be shipped to the site and be assembled. They have already spent too much for this tower. They will build it, with or without a major tenant, albeit at a very slow pace in the second case.

Dac150 · #**2738** Posted: **Jul 27, 2012, 1:03 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris123678

rumors.

Stick to the facts . . . people need to do that more, especially when it comes to this project.

I'll reiterate my previous post - the firm is completely committed to seeing the project through once the minimum leasing requirements are met.

chris123678 · #**2739** Posted: **Jul 27, 2012, 1:19 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by FMIII

With the Hudson Yards towers awaiting, I am afraid Silverstein and the PA will even find it harder to look for tenants for the whole site. So if they wait for a tenant, they won't build it any time soon...

However, as they say : "There is no smoke without fire". This rumor must have a part of truth.

When you simply take into account the fact that they have already spent a huge amount of money on this project, I can not imagine a single second that they could cap it at eight floors. There are a lot of materials awaiting somewhere in a wharehouse ready to be shipped to the site and be assembled. They have already spent too much for this tower. They will build it, with or without a major tenant, albeit at a very slow pace in the second case.

I honestly think that this tower won't be built if they don't find a tennant.
It was very idiotic for Larry To purchase steel he might never use.

Don098 · #**2740** Posted: **Jul 27, 2012, 3:37 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris123678

I honestly think that this tower won't be built if they don't find a tennant.
It was very idiotic for Larry To purchase steel he might never use.

And we still don't have proof that he purchased the entire order of steel. That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever as I've previously stated on this forum.