HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > SSP: Local Portland > Downtown & City of Portland

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Jul 1, 2007, 4:44 PM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,974
Downtown is Growing Up

http://www.oregonlive.com/business/o...910.xml&coll=7

interactive panorama of construction: http://www.oregonlive.com/news/orego...sf?pan_graphic

slideshow of construction: http://www.oregonlive.com/business/oregonian/index.ssf

DOWNTOWN IS GROWING UP
The building boom that's produced Portland's bumper crop of high-rises could spread, changing the look of the city skyline as Stumptown sprouts and soars
Sunday, July 01, 2007
So, you think Portland's downtown is almost filled up?

It's easy to believe, seeing a half-dozen or more tower cranes piercing the sky for about a decade. Developers have churned out an average 1.3 million square feet of condos, shops and offices each year since 1990. That's almost equal to two new Wells Fargo Centers -- at 41 floors, the state's tallest building.

A panoramic view of the skyline, photographed from a helicopter, brings the construction boom into a single, vast portrait of the Portland we know today. Take a look -- it won't stay this way for long.
Without so much as a zoning change, developers could double the 103 million square feet that now make up the central city. From the South Waterfront to the River District, from Goose Hollow to the Lloyd District, the city's zoning allows a virtual forest of high-rises. By the city's count, 400 acres of underused property -- think surface parking lots, or beat-up buildings worth less than half the value of the land they occupy -- is ripe for change.

No one knows how long it will take to fill all that land. At the current pace of construction, the doubling would take 75 years. It could take much longer: Downtown has plenty of competitors in the Portland region and worldwide. Or, perhaps the central city will boom beyond anyone's imagination.

Soon, "the city that plans" will launch an update of the central city, with new schemes for shaping the coming high-rise growth to fit the region's goals for urban containment. The present plan, adopted in 1988, opened the way for urban expansion into the Pearl District and South Waterfront. And an earlier 1972 Downtown Plan set out a vision for housing west of the Park Blocks that is only now bearing fruit.

These pages show some major recent and upcoming projects.

Who knows what's next?

-- Dylan Rivera

Downtown The region's traditional center of commerce. 232 acres Existing buildings: 37 million square feet Projected increase: 17 million square feet

ffice: 6.4 million square feet

Retail: 900,000 square feet

Housing: 8,954 units Strengths: The psychological heart of the Portland metro area, downtown has the highest concentration of employment, hotels, mass transit and non-mall retail. West End, Old Town, South Auditorium, Hawthorne and Morrison bridgeheads have buildable sites on cusp of transformation. Central City's best bet for office towers and hotels. Weaknesses: High cost of development and parking. Many existing buildings complicate new construction. Homeless population scares off some employers, residents. Condo market lags Pearl District and South Waterfront. Lloyd District and Lower Albina

A mall, a convention center, two arenas and lots of underused land. Adjacent to Central Eastside Industrial District south of Interstate 84. 328 acres Existing buildings: 17 million square feet Projected increase: 28.4 million square feet

Office: 11 million square feet

Retail: 1.5 million square feet

Housing: 12,740 units Strengths: Lloyd area has zoning for the tallest, densest development outside the downtown core. Generous parking allowances compared with downtown. Great views west and east. Incomparable transit and highway access. Weaknesses: Arena and convention areas sleepy when those attractions are not in use. No neighborhood focal point. Not much built lately; major landowners passed on condo boom. Lower Albina nearly all industrial zoned, with Portland School District headquarters site a tough play. River District The Pearl District and Old Town north of West Burnside. 238 acres Existing buildings: 20.5 million square feet Projected increase: 21.7 million square feet

Office: 4 million square feet

Retail: 1.4 million square feet

Housing: 11,944 units Strengths: The Pearl comprises the region's strongest, most established urban condo market. Retail and restaurants draw from across metro area. North Pearl development sites ready to pop. Old Town section and Post Office hold potential, with complications. Weaknesses: Little employment presence aside from Brewery Blocks. Old Town stigma and historic district restrictions work against potential high-rise housing and offices closer to downtown core. North section still considered risky for offices. South Waterfront The city's newest urban neighborhood. 129 acres Existing buildings: 4.1 million square feet Projected increase: 25 million square feet

Office: 10.8 million square feet

Retail: 1.3 million square feet

Housing: 10,146 units Strengths: Plentiful vacant land with riverfront views. Oregon Health & Science University expansion forecast to last decades. Lush Pearl alternative now a proven high-rise, high-end condo market. Weaknesses: Needs roads, light rail and other infrastructure. A nonstop construction zone for decades to come. Biotech doesn't normally build to SoWa's tall, expensive, dense standard. University District Portland State University and its eastward expansion area. 50 acres Existing buildings: 3.9 million square feet Projected increase: 4.6 million square feet

Office: 1.4 million square feet

Retail: 200,000 square feet

Housing: 2,837 units Strengths: PSU on a growth path, led by student housing. Light rail soon to meet streetcar line. Fourth Avenue stretch developable. Nearby conversion of Portland Center from apartments to condos adds more homeowners to area. Weaknesses: Uncertain state funding for higher education over long term. PSU still an unproven employment draw. Students dominate housing market.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Jul 1, 2007, 5:11 PM
WestCoast's Avatar
WestCoast WestCoast is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 373
I'm a recent transplant to downtown living, and I am happy as can be.

With the Max line coming south, PSU upgrading a bit, and new towers coming, the energy seems palpable to me.

Waiting around for the montgomery blocks to get going, think that could spice up southern downtown nicely in a few years as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Jul 1, 2007, 6:21 PM
PDX City-State PDX City-State is offline
Well designed mixed use
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: under the Burnside Bridge
Posts: 1,506
This article sucked. Sure--the panorama of downtown was nice, but Mr. Rivera didn't bother to mention the Allegro, the Manhattan, the hotel on 6th and Oak, the proposed 19-story Pearl tower next to Tanner Springs, the apartment tower in development across from Living Room Theaters, the possible tower next to the Jeffrey in the West End---and worst of all there were no renderings. Anyone of us could have done a better job.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Jul 1, 2007, 7:47 PM
PacificNW's Avatar
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Inhabited Sculpture
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florence, Oregon
Posts: 2,885
I have always had the same frustrations, PDX....it seems that the Portland news publications (the Portland Business Journal/Oregonian being the biggest offenders)
seldom publish renderings of proposed/actual projects; whereas I see this being done in other city's publications to a "greater" extent.
__________________
"I had this job once where I had to attach things together with small pieces of metal. It was riveting."

Last edited by PacificNW; Jul 1, 2007 at 8:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Jul 1, 2007, 8:08 PM
Drew-Ski's Avatar
Drew-Ski Drew-Ski is offline
Green Giant
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: pdx-phx-pdx
Posts: 134
I have no confidence in the Oregonian Staff Writers. They can take a blockbuster topic and destroy it with an absence of meaningful and organized content. What a shame.
__________________
Save the Environment
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Jul 1, 2007, 8:22 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 11,528
Seattle's papers don't either...

...except the Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce, which I love with all my heart. They don't have big articles and renderings about every project, but they do have little articles at permitting junctures. When a developer sends out a press release the DJC will typically run something prominently. And having every article since 1990 at one's fingertips is a freaking miracle.

Portland has a DJC. I don't subscribe and don't really know how good it is. Our Portland office sends stories my way occasionally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Jul 1, 2007, 8:55 PM
PacificNW's Avatar
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Inhabited Sculpture
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florence, Oregon
Posts: 2,885
The Portland DJC isn't up to the standards of the Seattle DJC.... Maybe it's more expensive to actually publish renderings.....even the Puget Sound Business Journal does much better than the Portland edition.... if you are the reader who wants updates on Insurance/Medical Insurance, etc. the Portland BJ is your thing... The PDX BJ just had a special publication of Commercial Structures and nary a rendering....
__________________
"I had this job once where I had to attach things together with small pieces of metal. It was riveting."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Jul 1, 2007, 11:33 PM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 1,893
City-state: the Manhattan does get a mention in the online panorama, but it says it is "on hold", as previously reported here. I have a funny feeling that the Allegro is on hold as well.

So Harsch is considering apartments next to the Belluschi building?

Last edited by tworivers; Jul 2, 2007 at 12:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Jul 2, 2007, 12:47 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 1,893
2007 Central Portland Development Capacity Study

http://www.portlandonline.com/planni...ex.cfm?c=38338
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Jul 2, 2007, 4:10 AM
cab cab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,230
If the Oregonian had any kind of guts they would of followed up and asked WHY DT didn't build anything during the boom times while the neighborhoods to the North and south did. That would actually take a little bit of digging not something the oregonian does well. I guess why dig when a story about a cat shot with an arrow will boot you off the front page every time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Jul 2, 2007, 6:30 PM
gooddirt gooddirt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 94
When was downtown Portland's last major office development? Are any planned on the horizon?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Jul 2, 2007, 7:01 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is online now
Go By Streetcar!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,970
^Fox Tower (2000) and yes...Park Avenue West, First and Main, and possibly 100 Columbia are all in the works as far as office towers anyway.

I've e-mailed the Allegro website with two different e-mails on a few different occasions and haven't got a single reply...
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: Jul 3, 2007, 9:36 PM
ATR ATR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 12
It doesn't cost to get renderings...

but it sometimes takes a little wrangling between architects and clients (who can be hesitant to release images of projects that aren't fully formed). PDX architectural firms, though, are usually really gracious about use of renderings.


Alison
alison.ryan@djcOregon.com
Portland Daily Journal of Commerce
www.builtpdx.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted: Jul 3, 2007, 10:17 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is online now
Go By Streetcar!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,970
^hey...I know your name...not personally...but you just had a terrific interview with Becca Cavell on the Street of Eames/mid-century architecture recently!
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted: Jul 4, 2007, 1:37 AM
NorskyGirl NorskyGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 75
Speaking of growing up...

Similar photos have been posted before on other threads, but on such a beautiful day (albeit a little hazy), I thought this grownup picture of Portland belonged here. The shot was taken from near the top of the aerial tramway. Portland is such a pretty city.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted: Jul 4, 2007, 1:45 AM
PacificNW's Avatar
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Inhabited Sculpture
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florence, Oregon
Posts: 2,885
Beautiful!
__________________
"I had this job once where I had to attach things together with small pieces of metal. It was riveting."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted: Jul 4, 2007, 3:11 AM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,974
the harrison and the condos close to I-450 are such a eyesore. but its a great picture!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted: Jul 4, 2007, 4:15 AM
PacificNW's Avatar
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Inhabited Sculpture
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florence, Oregon
Posts: 2,885
I have seen much worse.....They are so-so example's of that particular architectural period...socialist???
__________________
"I had this job once where I had to attach things together with small pieces of metal. It was riveting."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted: Jul 4, 2007, 4:45 AM
WestCoast's Avatar
WestCoast WestCoast is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 373
harrison south is just being painted, and will look a bit better when it is done.

the three towers closest in that shot are the American Plaza building, and good lord do they need paint.

Sure, not the greatest building, but dense and downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted: Jul 5, 2007, 4:02 PM
gooddirt gooddirt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 94
that view of the city hasn't changed appreciably in 20 years. For all the talk of growing up and densifying, nothing will match the tax-syndication motivated office boom of the 80's

Last edited by gooddirt; Jul 5, 2007 at 4:02 PM. Reason: can't spell
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > SSP: Local Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:02 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.