HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > SSP: Local Portland > Transportation & Infrastructure

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Jul 23, 2007, 8:11 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Go By Streetcar!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,991
Pearl wants Sauvie Bridge

Pearl wants Sauvie Bridge
Sauvie Island Bridge may find new life as a bike/pedestrian span
Portland Business Journal - July 20, 2007
by Andy Giegerich

Taking sustainability to drastic new levels, the city of Portland wants to spend $5 million to move the Sauvie Island Bridge to the Pearl District. That's twice the cost it would take to build a new bridge in the Pearl altogether.

The neighbors and the city aim to create an Interstate 405 overpass connecting the Pearl and the Northwest 23rd Avenue area at Northwest Flanders Street. Once installed, the structure would limit its traffic to bicycles and pedestrians, serving as the centerpiece of a proposed Flanders Street "bike boulevard."

The $5 million project, which still needs various approvals but would take place once the new Sauvie Island Bridge is completed next summer, would create a logistical spectacle.

As the entire structure remains in one piece, workers would place it onto a massive barge, then float it upstream on the Willamette Channel to the Willamette River, then seven miles from Sauvie Island to Tom McCall Waterfront Park.

The bridge would then be loaded onto a truck and driven 14 blocks west to Northwest Flanders Street.

Neighbors like the idea so much that they're volunteering to help pay a big chunk of the estimated $2.5 million cost difference between moving the bridge's arched center truss to the Pearl and building a new one.

The Pearl District Neighborhood Association's planning committee voted unanimously on Tuesday to support creating private funding sources for the project, from both neighbors and businesses, as well as exploring whether the district's urban renewal funds could help defray some of the project's $5 million price tag.

If neighbors don't pay for the whole project, the city may need to kick in up to $2.5 million of the costs, or roughly the amount it would cost to build a new structure over I-405 as opposed to moving the Sauvie Island Bridge there. The city's share could come from system development charges or transportation funds.

"The nice thing is, this won't take money out of the general fund," said Patricia Gardner, who chairs the Pearl neighbors' planning committee. "But we're willing to raise funds for it. This is something that will work."

Neighbors and city leaders believe moving the bridge, rather than building a new one, would provide a better bike and pedestrian link between the Pearl and the Northwest 23rd neighborhood. It's difficult crossing I-405 on either Northwest Everett or Glisan street because those overpasses contain narrow sidewalks and minimal room for bikes.

As for moving an existing bridge at a higher cost than building a new structure, a new $2.5 million overpass would be 12 feet wide, as opposed to the 40-foot-wide Sauvie Bridge, making for a better walk or bike ride. It would also nicely preserve a piece of history while serving as a monument to sustainability, supporters say.

"You can build something new more cheaply than you can preserve something that's old," said David O'Longaigh, the city's bridges and structures supervising engineer. "But it's kind of like the difference between building a skinny row house, which was built to last 40 years, and moving a carriage house, which was built to last 200 years."

City Commissioner Sam Adams, who oversees the city's transportation efforts, told neighbors a year ago he wanted them and other private sector types to fund the move, said Roland Chlapowski, Adams' policy director.

"While it's a great project, we can't fiscally see diverting funds from anywhere else for it," he said.

While the project has generally drawn support, one commenter to Adams' blog voiced concerns that bicyclists, who'd benefit the most from the move, wouldn't pay their fair share toward the project.

One business owner, initially skeptical about the idea, now strongly backs it.

"It would be a wonderful amenity," said Reuel Fish, a principal in the Urban Wineworks store at 407 N.W. 16th Ave. "When you watch people coming from Northwest to the Pearl, it's certainly not pedestrian-friendly. It would actually enhance the flow of people and potential shoppers to both neighborhoods."

The most expensive part of the project, $1.6 million, would come from moving the structure upriver to Waterfront Park. It would cost $500,000 to build new foundations and $1.4 million to remove the bridge's lead paint.

Another half-million would pay for items such as stormwater provisions and relocating obstacles during the bridge's move; the final $1 million are contingency fees for unexpected developments.

The bridge weighs 500 tons, with 300 tons being concrete and 200 tons being steel.

O'Longaigh said the 200-foot-long bridge would span I-405 with 10 to 15 feet to spare and contain no intermediate supports.

"It's a perfect fit in many ways," he said. "We think we can support it on piled foundations right in that location."

agiegerich@bizjournals.com | 503-219-3419
http://portland.bizjournals.com/port...ml?t=printable
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Jul 23, 2007, 8:30 PM
mcbaby mcbaby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 562
cool. any renderings of how it will fit that location?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Jul 23, 2007, 8:43 PM
pdxtraveler pdxtraveler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 401
There was a rendering, I believe in the NW Examiner about a year ago. I looked great IMHO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Jul 23, 2007, 10:27 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Go By Streetcar!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,991
this is the only one I could find...from commissionersam.com

__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Jul 23, 2007, 10:37 PM
pdxtraveler pdxtraveler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 401
That's it one I saw Mark! Good job.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Feb 26, 2008, 10:00 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Go By Streetcar!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,991
awesome picture from today's article in the DJC




Use it or lose it: City scrambles to save old bridge from scrap heap

The city wants to use the old Sauvie Island Bridge as a pedestrian and bike bridge in Northwest Portland. But it has to find the money first.
Daily Journal of Commerce
POSTED: 06:00 AM PST Monday, February 25, 2008
BY NATHALIE WEINSTEIN

Though it’s outlived its life in terms of auto use, the center span of the old Sauvie Island Bridge could be reborn as a pedestrian and bike bridge in Northwest Portland.

But before the gap at Northwest Flanders Street over Interstate 405 can be crossed, the old green arch needs the city to find greenbacks. And fast.

Max J. Kuney Co., which built and installed the new Sauvie bridge, acquired the old bridge as part of its contract for installing a new Sauvie Island Bridge span at the end of last year.

Kuney gave the city of Portland one month to find $5.5 million to move, install and refurbish the old structure. If the money doesn’t come through, Kuney will scrap it.

The city has $4 million so far from system development fees for a bike boulevard over Northwest Flanders and River District tax-increment funding. But finding the final $1.5 million is going to be a challenge, according to Tom Miller, chief of staff to Commissioner Sam Adams.

“With the economy sliding, we’re not entirely sure about business participation,” Miller said. “We are unlikely to find funds that large at the community level, but if we can get institutional help, then we can nickel and dime it at the community level to bring in the remaining funds.”

The city plans on tapping the Oregon Department of Transportation, Metro and the state for funding, Miller added.

Once the money is found, the city will contract with Kuney to move the bridge from Sauvie Island to Flanders Street, replace existing lead paint with new paint, construct new foundation supports and tackle site improvements.

Kuney supports the project, as do city, state and neighborhood agencies and groups, according to Bill Hoffman, a project manager with the Portland Department of Transportation.

But some neighbors think it would be cheaper to build a new pedestrian bridge.

“It’s really a normal question to ask,” Hoffman said. “But no one is saying, ‘Darn it, build that cheaper bridge.’”

The old Sauvie Bridge, at 30-feet wide, is the safest and most economical choice, according to Roland Chlapowski, Adams’ senior policy director. Building a new bridge of that same width would be more expensive than moving the Sauvie structure. And while constructing a new, narrower bridge – say 15-feet wide – would be a cheaper alternative, it isn’t really a feasible option, Chlapowski said.

“We could get by with a bridge with a shorter width,” he said, “but more space means less pedestrian-bicycle conflicts. With walking and biking going in two directions, that can cause more problems. Since we have (the old Sauvie Island Bridge) on hand, we are able to get a wider bridge for less money.”

In addition to serving pedestrians and cyclists, the bridge would be a connection between the Pearl District and the Northwest District neighborhood, Hoffman said.

“There is something hugely romantic about it,” he said.

“It’s an iconic structure in the community and we are moving it into the inner city. It speaks to our commitment to diminishing the barrier that (Interstate 405) makes between these two neighborhoods.”
http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDeta...use-the-old-Sa
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Feb 26, 2008, 11:00 PM
PacificNW's Avatar
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Inhabited Sculpture
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florence, Oregon
Posts: 2,888
⇑ Outdoor art festivals/fairs could also utilize the bridge..(I have seen this done in other cities).
__________________
"I had this job once where I had to attach things together with small pieces of metal. It was riveting."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Apr 26, 2008, 1:27 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Go By Streetcar!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,991
Hey Dougall, this should probably be moved to the Transportation forum.

I can't believe with all the controversy, nobody here has commented in the last couple weeks about this...


Bridge troubles the waters
Backers say new I-405 crossing needed; foes see better uses for cash
By Jim Redden
The Portland Tribune, Apr 25, 2008

The idea of building a new pedestrian and bicycle bridge over Interstate 405 in Northwest Portland has turned into a fight over conflicting visions of the city’s future.

It is controversial because many other crossings already exist on both sides of the proposed location on Northwest Flanders Street. The other crossings include four bridges over I-405 and 11 streets that run under it.

In addition, the controversy is being heightened by the idea of using the old Sauvie Island Bridge, pushing the projected cost from $3.8 million to $5.5 million. The Sauvie Bridge will be removed later this year after the bridge Multnomah County is building to the island opens.

Advocates for the bridge – called the Flanders Street Crossing – argue that the existing crossings are either too unsafe or inconvenient for pedestrians and bicycle traffic, which are alternative forms of transportation considered essential to fighting climate change.

They also argue that reusing the old Sauvie Island Bridge will demonstrate Portland’s commitment to recycling and green technology.

“The bridge is a symbol of the commitment we’re willing to make to be a leader in the movement to build greener cities,” said Patricia Gardner, an architect who serves as the land-use committee chairwoman of the Pearl District Neighborhood Association.

Opponents – including Mayor Tom Potter – argue that the project is a luxury that will divert limited funds from more basic projects, such as filling potholes.

“Tom’s No. 1 concern is the city’s priorities,” said Potter press aide John Doussard. “These are the wrong priorities.”

The City Council appears poised to approve the project. A majority of the council – commissioners Sam Adams, Randy Leonard and Dan Saltzman – have submitted an ordinance authorizing the project that will be heard Wednesday. It caps the cost of acquiring and moving the bridge at $3.9 million.

The ordinance also puts the contract for installing the bridge over the freeway to be put out to bid. The final vote is scheduled for May 7.

Even if the council approves the project, however, the debate is likely to continue for months – if not years – to come. It has already become an issue in the mayor’s race because it is being championed by Adams and opposed by his major opponent, businessman Sho Dozono, who echoes Potter’s criticisms.

Despite the attacks, Adams is remaining firm in his support of the project, justifying it on numerous grounds, from increasing pedestrian and bicycle safety to historic preservation.

“I understand the risks of pushing this project forward while running for mayor, but I believe it is the right thing to do,” Adams said.
An idea gains momentum

According to Gardner, the idea of building a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over I-405 at Flanders first surfaced about six years ago. At that time, she was serving on an advisory committee trying to figure out how to make Burnside Street less of a barrier between downtown and the Pearl District.

The major thoroughfare between Northwest and Southwest Portland has long been considered dangerous for both bicyclists riding it and anyone trying to cross it.

One idea that quickly gained traction on the committee was giving bicyclists a safer way across I-405 – a route pedestrians could use, too. This idea was pursued even though three other bridges cross I-405 within five blocks of Burnside – at Northwest Couch, Everett and Glisan streets.

As Gardner sees it, none of these three bridges is any safer than Burnside. All have on or offramps to I-405 that cross the existing crosswalks and bicycle paths. In addition, the sidewalks on all four bridges are narrower than the current 10-foot city minimum standard. Some are only 2 feet wide.

“Everyone who crosses these bridges can tell you how dangerous they feel, especially at rush hours,” Gardner said.

The committee eventually chose Flanders Street for a new pedestrian and bicycle bridge, in part because it passes just north of the dense, mixed-use Brewery Blocks in the Pearl District.

Although every street from Johnson north to Thurman actually passes under I-405, Gardner argues that is a long detour for pedestrians and bicyclists trying to get closer to Burnside.

“What kind of a message does it send if bicyclists and pedestrians are expected to go blocks out of their way?” Gardner asked. “How does that encourage people to get out of their cars?”

The idea of the Flanders crossing was approved by the City Council in 2002 as part of the Burnside-Couch Couplet plan that could reduce traffic on Burnside through a variety of means, including turning a portion of Northwest Couch into a one-way street and running a Portland streetcar line on several blocks of both of them.

The committee originally recommended that the city build a 15-foot-wide concrete bridge over I-405 at Flanders. That is the maximum width for such a bridge allowed by the federal government over its freeways.

But then a few years ago, Multnomah County announced it would sell the old Sauvie Island Bridge as part of its project to build a new one.

“Some of us thought, ‘Wouldn’t that be cool if we could buy the bridge for $1 and move it to Flanders?’ ” Gardner said.

In fact, when the Portland Office of Transportation researched the idea, they realized such a relocation could be done. The federal width restriction applied only to new bridges. A loophole allows the 26-foot-wide Sauvie Bridge to be installed over I-405.

“At that point, it became clear moving the Sauvie Island Bridge was the best alternative,” Gardner said.

The cost difference eventually was determined to be $1.7 million – $3.8 million for a new bridge versus $5.5 million for relocating the original Sauvie Island Bridge. Convinced the additional cost was worth it, the Pearl District Neighborhood Association endorsed the relocation idea in spring 2006.
A turnaround in thinking

Adams did not immediately embrace the plan when he was assigned to PDOT in mid-2005.

“I was skeptical,” he said.

But Adams changed his mind after learning more about the high rate of serious bicycle-automobile accidents on the existing bridges – 20 in 10 years – and seeing how strongly the surrounding neighborhoods supported it.

Now he is asking the council to fund the $5.5 million project from a variety of sources: $2 million in redevelopment funds from the River District Urban Renewal Area that includes the Pearl District; $2 million from Transportation System Development Charges collected throughout the city; $1 million from a federal transportation program intended to preserve and enhance historical, cultural and environmental assets; and $500,000 from city general-fund dollars he hopes the council will approve as part of a larger transportation safety and environmental improvement program in next year’s budget.

Community supporters also are promising to raise $500,000 for such added amenities as lighting on the bridge.

“We have people willing to write out checks for thousands of dollars right now,” she said.

Opposition to either version of the project was relatively muted until March 31, when Potter sent a memo to the other council members questioning the need for the entire project, given the city’s other transportation needs.

Although the transportation development and federal funds can be spent in other parts of the city, the urban renewal funds can only be spent in the River District.

“Does the need for this bridge outweigh other capital transportation requests we currently have?” Potter wrote. “Crossing I-405 does not appear to be an immediate problem for bikes or pedestrians given that there are currently two overpasses on either side of Flanders – one on Everett, another on Glisan.”

Potter’s memo also questioned whether the high cost of using the Sauvie Island Bridge was worth it.

“Building a new, 15-foot-wide bridge would cost approximately $1.5 million less than using the 30-foot Sauvie Bridge,” Potter wrote, using a figure before the most recent cost estimate.

“Are there mitigating safety factors or other concerns that justify the much greater costs at a time when the economy is slowing? Is there any documentation on how the preference for the wider bridge was reached?”

The issue then got picked up by Dozono in his race against Adams for mayor. During several recent joint appearances, Dozono has declared that he is against the project, saying it is an example of the city’s misplaced priorities.

At an April 14 debate sponsored by Portland Spaces magazine, Dozono said the bridge was not needed because Johnson runs under I-405 just four blocks north of Flanders. He also said the council should think about the broader needs of the city. Dozono repeated his objections four days later at the mayoral debate sponsored by the City Club of Portland.

Then and now, Adams defends his commitment to the entire city, noting that half of the $11 million in new transportation safety spending approved in this year’s budget is being spent on the east side of Portland, including 82nd and 122nd avenues.

Adams also argues that reusing the old Sauvie Island Bridge will be the largest recycling program in city history.

“This is a city that is willing to spend more on green and historic buildings because we value the environment,” he said.

jimredden@portlandtribune.com

Mayor Tom Potter responded Thursday with a statement on the proposed Sauvie Island Bridge ordinance:

The debate isn't about sustainability, our commitment to bicyclists and pedestrians, or safety. The debate is about our priorities and how we spend at least $5.5 million when our streets need basic maintenance, and some neighborhoods still can't get sidewalks built.

This bridge will give the Pearl District three overpasses in a three-block span – while Cully still waits for sidewalks. And while one accident anywhere is one accident too many, the N.W. Flanders site is not on PDOT’s list of dangerous intersections for either autos, bikes or pedestrians.
http://www.portlandtribune.com/news/...07314408884500
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Apr 26, 2008, 10:05 PM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 1,911
Yeah, anyone read Phil Stanford's column? Or are we all simultaneously trying to ignore him?

The Tribune is such a waste of paper. I can't believe they keep pandering to their readership with the Sustainable Life section, and then turn around and pay some ass-backwards goon like him who would otherwise be unemployed to write a column in every issue. That guy needs to lose his platform pronto.

Anyways, I am really happy that Potter is not going to get away with his anti-Sam agenda, on this occasion at least.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Apr 26, 2008, 10:19 PM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 1,911
Just read this on bikeportland: (Tell it like it is Randy!)

Quote:
Commissioner Randy Leonard didn’t mince his feelings about Mayor Potter’s criticisms of the plan. He told the crowd he was, “extremely disappointed that Potter would divide Portlanders…into the lowest common denominator in order to further the political interests of his friend who is running for mayor.”

“From where I sit,” said Leonard, “his [Mayor Potter’s] actions couldn’t be any more disingenuous.”

Calling Potter’s conduct, “One of the most deeply disappointing experiences of my entire public life,” Leonard said the event should be “a celebration” of what Adams is doing for bicyclists and pedestrians. Leonard said the Flanders crossing is a matter of “equity” — a project that will give Northwest residents the same “unmolested [from cars]” biking opportunities that outer Southeast Portlanders (like himself) enjoy on the recently completed Three Bridges on the Springwater Corridor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Apr 27, 2008, 7:02 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is online now
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 3,791
yeah, bikeportland has been covering it in depth, if you want updates on the issue.

Potter's shown everyone how irrelevant he is again...
__________________
Portland Bike Bridge traffic:

2009 - 15,749
2010 - 17,576
2011 - 18,257
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: May 7, 2008, 6:13 PM
digme digme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 47
Bad news for the project. Its been canceled.

http://bikeportland.org/2008/05/07/l...ion/#more-7467
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: May 8, 2008, 3:36 AM
philopdx philopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 913
The first comment listed after the story was the best summary of the whole episode..

"What irony, rising fuel costs ultimately kill a project that would help reduce our reliance on fuel."

Yeah well, here's an even better idea, let's eliminate the tax on gasoline for just a little while, thereby shifting the demand curve to the right, knock the equilibrium price up a few percent while simultaneously gutting our road budget and enlarging our carbon footprint! (WAIT, someone already beat me to it!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted: May 8, 2008, 3:44 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,114
^ luckily, it's looking better and better for the one candidate who isn't proposing that kind of "solution"

Last edited by bvpcvm; May 9, 2008 at 6:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted: May 8, 2008, 4:03 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is online now
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 3,791
So who's gonna vote for Nader this time around?



joking, people...
__________________
Portland Bike Bridge traffic:

2009 - 15,749
2010 - 17,576
2011 - 18,257
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted: May 8, 2008, 5:44 AM
RED_PDXer RED_PDXer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by philopdx View Post
The first comment listed after the story was the best summary of the whole episode..

"What irony, rising fuel costs ultimately kill a project that would help reduce our reliance on fuel."

Yeah well, here's an even better idea, let's eliminate the tax on gasoline for just a little while, thereby shifting the demand curve to the right, knock the equilibrium price up a few percent while simultaneously gutting our road budget and enlarging our carbon footprint! (WAIT, someone already beat me to it!)
Either I'm getting smarter or the candidates are dumbing down... Has political posturing ever been so poor as to propose a hiatus on the gas tax when its needed most?

On a related note, I heard Al Gore on NPR this evening.. Man.. this country got shafted with the current nimrod in the white house.. It's apparent to me every time Al talks...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted: May 9, 2008, 5:10 AM
sopdx sopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by bvpcvm View Post
^ luckily, it's look better and better for the one candidate who isn't proposing that kind of "solution"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted: May 9, 2008, 7:40 AM
philopdx philopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 913
Well, you know, all I have to say is that peak oil, whenever it may arrive (assuming it hasn't already) is gonna suck real bad.

It's going to be really expensive to build out transit; which includes high capacity(think rail), buses, bike lanes and paths, pedestrian access,etc.

But it's going to be unbearably, devastatingly expensive to keep chugging along sucking down oil as the price rises into the stratosphere, crimping the very revenue sources we need to shift to a less oil-intensive kind of livelihood.

And not just that, but only 8% of the world's oil supply is accessible by the big corporations like Exxon and BP; the rest is controlled by sovereign operations like Aramco of Saudi Arabia or Gasprov or Russia.

So even if we uncork a massive supply of new oil through the more exotic sources like oil shale and tar sands, chances are we'll have to convince a state-owned oil company to allow us to pursue it. I wonder what the chances are of that happening?

We could always "drink their milkshake" - where is Daniel Plainview when you need him?

Oh well, we're going to reap what we've sown and the chickens are coming home to roost. <sigh> Sorry for the metaphorical overload

I'd hate to be a Hummer dealer right about now...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...050103773.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted: Dec 29, 2009, 2:47 AM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,370
This thing was supposed to go OVER I-405? Does the Pearl still seem interested in such a thing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted: Dec 29, 2009, 3:04 AM
PacificNW's Avatar
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Inhabited Sculpture
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florence, Oregon
Posts: 2,888
▲▲ I will mention (although you probably are aware of this) but the bridge was scrapped....the "concept" still has merit, IMO.
__________________
"I had this job once where I had to attach things together with small pieces of metal. It was riveting."
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > SSP: Local Portland > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:42 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.