HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted: Feb 4, 2009, 3:09 AM
Duke-Of-Waterloo's Avatar
Duke-Of-Waterloo Duke-Of-Waterloo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Waterloo, ON
Posts: 559
Waterloo will talk about regional reform, not amalgamation

(By Liz Monteiro, THE RECORD, Tuesday, February 3, 2009)
RECORD STAFF

WATERLOO


The City of Waterloo will create a task force to talk about municipal reform -- but not amalgamation, according to the councillor who proposed it.

Councillors voted unanimously last night to create a committee -- with representatives invited from all municipalities in Waterloo Region -- to find ways to increase efficiency.


"It is not a discussion of amalgamation," said Coun. Jan d'Ailly, who proposed the task force with the goal of getting the most bang for tax dollars.

"How can we better improve our services and save costs for our citizens?"

Jim Erb, chair of Citizens for Better Government, said he was pleased with the decision.

"It's a great step," he said after councillors held a committee meeting.

"At the end of the day, we may not get what we asked for, but more co-operation and creating more efficiencies in areas such as libraries, water and emergency services -- then I'm pleased."

Citizens for Better Government supports merging eight local governments and cutting the number of municipal politicians. The group says $10 million could be saved by amalgamation.

Kitchener has said it wants to continue talking about reform, but Cambridge and North Dumfries are against amalgamation talks.

The Waterloo task force will prepare a list of projects in which cities and municipalities can find more cost-savings in their operations. The first meeting is planned for March.

Coun. Angela Vieth said she was concerned some municipalities may not want to participate. "What if the townships don't want to play?" she said.

Some residents spoke against setting up a task force, suggesting members would talk about amalgamation regardless of their brief.

Victor Hiebert told councillors that one massive city would reduce access to government.

To date, there have been no proven cost-savings, he said.

"Kitchener will dominate," he predicted if the region became one city (Duke: now that's a true Waterlooian speaking! ). "Cambridge has bowed out. Waterloo should bow out too."

Robert Fleming said it would be "repugnant" to have city staff and politicians proceed with dissolving the city without input from citizens.


http://news.therecord.com/News/Local/article/481363
__________________
Visit MyMiniCity - http://erbsville.myminicity.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted: Feb 4, 2009, 5:38 AM
notmyfriends's Avatar
notmyfriends notmyfriends is offline
Keepin it Real
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 317
So, how do we get on this committee?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted: Feb 7, 2009, 4:41 PM
Actonite Actonite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 135
What's the general feel here about amalgamation now? Does any one still think it's possible?
I would say no, it's not going to happen. When CFBG first put their report out I thought that maybe we would see much of the region united with Cambridge going it on their own but I think even that has slim to no chance now.
I don't know how I feel about partialy amalgamating the region. I'm kind of an all or nothing kind of person.
How do others feel about the posibility of part of the region amalgamating? If it was only a partial amalgamation would we keep the regional government or would we no longer need it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted: Feb 7, 2009, 7:59 PM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 1,520
I would have liked to see the whole Region amalgamate, but it seems very unlikely after hearing the various players involved at this time. Cambridge isn't interested at all, Waterloo and the townships dont seem interested. It seems a new generation will have to deal with this issue in a future age...
__________________
My Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=52344624
A proud member of the former Airborne Regiment, 87-88
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted: Feb 7, 2009, 9:15 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,577
Realistically it will be a one-step-at-a-time approach. Probably regionalized and co-shared services, giving way to regionalized oversight some day.
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted: Feb 7, 2009, 10:10 PM
Ktown4ever Ktown4ever is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actonite View Post
What's the general feel here about amalgamation now? Does any one still think it's possible?
I would say no, it's not going to happen. When CFBG first put their report out I thought that maybe we would see much of the region united with Cambridge going it on their own but I think even that has slim to no chance now.
I don't know how I feel about partialy amalgamating the region. I'm kind of an all or nothing kind of person.
How do others feel about the posibility of part of the region amalgamating? If it was only a partial amalgamation would we keep the regional government or would we no longer need it?
I have an all-or-nothing opinion on this, and while I am Pro Almagamting...I am doubtful that it will happen in this decade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted: Feb 7, 2009, 10:35 PM
dunkalunk's Avatar
dunkalunk dunkalunk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A century home in Kitchnener
Posts: 325
The last thing we want to do is copy the Montreal example in which former municipalities began to break off from the region.

The most likely scenario I see would be for Kitchener, Waterloo, Woolwich and possibly Wilmont agreeing to combine city services and administration, leaving Cambridge to do as they wish. They would be amalgamated in everything but name.

Hopefully this would help protect the countryside line similar to what hepped with the NCC and the greenbelt. We do not need any more development north of Benjamin road or County Squire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted: Jan 8, 2010, 9:00 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 6,033
Amalgamation may be back on the table, but only for two cities
http://news.therecord.com/News/Local/article/653071

January 08, 2010
BY TERRY PENDER, RECORD STAFF
KITCHENER — Amalgamation may be back on the local political agenda, but only for two cities.

Councillors for Kitchener and Waterloo will be asked Monday to support a referendum, to be included in this fall’s municipal elections, about holding merger talks between their two cities.

High-tech executives are scheduled to appear as delegations in both Kitchener and Waterloo with a simple request — that both city councils ask the Ontario government for permission to include a single question on this fall’s ballots.

The question: “Would you support members of council engaging in a dialogue about the merits of merging the cities of Kitchener and Waterloo? Yes or No.”

Unlike previous attempts at amalgamating the eight municipal governments of Waterloo Region, this one focuses solely on the cities of Kitchener and Waterloo.

The latest group to push for the talks includes Ian Klugman of Communitech and Tim Jackson of Tech Capital Partners. Part of the push includes an open letter delivered earlier this week to the mayors and councils of Kitchener and Waterloo and signed by more than 50 leaders in business and the arts, including Sandvine president Dave Caputo, Open Text executive chair Tom Jenkins, David Marskell, executive director of the Waterloo Region Children’s Museum and Jamie Grant, general manager of the Centre in the Square.

“I suspect there will be some questions but I also suspect there will be some support,” Kitchener Mayor Carl Zehr said in an interview Thursday.

“How can you say ‘no’ to engaging in some dialogue?” Zehr said.

In the 1990s, the Conservative government under then-premier Mike Harris forced amalgamations in Sudbury, Ottawa, Toronto and Hamilton, among other cities. But that government would not force the issue in Waterloo Region.

In 2006, a push for amalgamation came from a group called Citizens for Better Government. That, too, was unsuccessful in advancing the issue among the region, the three cities and the townships.

This latest move is focused solely on Kitchener and Waterloo.

Zehr is on board all the way — holding a referendum, holding talks and creating one city out of two.

“If we cannot have a one-tier system, then at a minimum, Kitchener and Waterloo should look at merging, because it makes eminent sense,” Zehr said.

In Waterloo, Coun. Mark Whaley gets excited about “extending Waterloo’s borders to the 401.”

When Whaley was first elected in 2003, the two cities were not co-operating.

“Today, we have almost 60 joint service initiatives,” Whaley said, “and I have voted for every one of them.”

Holding a referendum and then merger talks is a natural evolution, he said.

“We are talking about a dialogue on merging our cities to provide better services,” Whaley said.

Whaley does not want to see the current push for a municipal merger get bogged down in holding talks with municipalities that are not interested in even talking about it.

“Why try to partner with people who do not want to partner with you?” Whaley said.

Cambridge Mayor Doug Craig has been one of the most vocal opponents of amalgamation into a megacity. Craig and his council were not included in a letter from those pushing for the merger of Kitchener and Waterloo.

The open letter delivered to council members said, in part:

“How effective is our messaging to regional, provincial and national audiences? Are we maximizing our potential for provincial and national funding and for investment attraction? Is our current twin city structure the right plan for ensuring a sustainable and prosperous future?”

“Past efforts to address these questions have yielded no conclusive community viewpoint because the discussion has never properly begun. The only way to have this important conversation about our future is to give it the attention it requires, warrants and deserves — by asking the Province of Ontario to create the environment required for effective dialogue and debate through posing a direct question to the people of both cities during the 2010 municipal election,” says the letter.

tpender@therecord.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted: Jan 8, 2010, 12:53 PM
timc timc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 66
I really hope this gets a shot. I've wanted to see amalgamation for about as long as I've lived in K-W (15 years).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted: Jan 8, 2010, 7:45 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,577
[Obligatory comment from DukeofWaterloo about the leech that Kitchener will be if attached to Waterloo in any form./]
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted: Jan 8, 2010, 9:25 PM
kitchener-lrt's Avatar
kitchener-lrt kitchener-lrt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 699
I'd like to see Kitchener and Waterloo amalgamated. If nothing else, then at least our fire departments.
__________________
Toronto FC Supporter
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted: Jan 8, 2010, 11:55 PM
Actonite Actonite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by timc View Post
I really hope this gets a shot. I've wanted to see amalgamation for about as long as I've lived in K-W (15 years).
I feel the same way.

I was quite happy to hear that several politicians from Waterloo liked this idea of at least opening up the discussion.

I would love to see the whole region united some time but K/W would be a wonderful start. The idea of getting this on a ballot may seem like a small step. After all the referendum question would be about simply getting discussions started but the fact this has been kicked around for decades and has never made it that far makes this a much bigger step than we've ever seen before.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted: Jan 9, 2010, 4:56 AM
dunkalunk's Avatar
dunkalunk dunkalunk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A century home in Kitchnener
Posts: 325
I like the idea, especially involved will the full amalgamation of services, the only thing that still irks me is the whole name issue. What on earth would we call this new municipal entity? I for one propose K-Dubblesburgh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted: Jan 9, 2010, 5:30 AM
mpd618 mpd618 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by dunkalunk View Post
I like the idea, especially involved will the full amalgamation of services, the only thing that still irks me is the whole name issue. What on earth would we call this new municipal entity? I for one propose K-Dubblesburgh.
I think it would be pretty hard to get people behind anything except Kitchener-Waterloo -- which it already is. But how about Kitloo?

Anyway, I'm for it, as I think at this point the division between Kitchener and Waterloo is a purely academic one. It's hindering the servicing and urban planning that should be happening in a coordinated fashion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted: Jan 9, 2010, 12:59 PM
Tibor420's Avatar
Tibor420 Tibor420 is offline
The Grim Reefer
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 36
Nice to see this being talked about again.... if the region did all merge I always was partial to the name "Grand River, Ontario"... i dunno why it just sounds good...

(Raises flame shield)

The Grand River Rangers even kinda works...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted: Jan 9, 2010, 3:57 PM
DHLawrence DHLawrence is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cambridge, Ontario
Posts: 906
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpd618 View Post
Anyway, I'm for it, as I think at this point the division between Kitchener and Waterloo is a purely academic one. It's hindering the servicing and urban planning that should be happening in a coordinated fashion.
Which is why merging the two will be the easiest amalgamation to accomplish; all you have to do is cross the street to go from one to the other. With Cambridge and the townships, there's still a rather large divide between them and KW, both physically and mentally, one that's likely to persist for a long time. (Interestingly, when Galt wanted the the new Preston-Hespeler-Galt-Blair city to be called 'Galt', Preston and Hespeler threatened to join Kitchener unless they compromised.)

I wonder--considering how big the divide between the townships and the urban areas is, what would be the likelihood of the outer regions of the townships being turned over to surrounding counties if the rest of the region merges together? Presumably communities like St Jacobs and Breslau would join the new megacity since their existence is tied into ours so closely.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted: Jan 10, 2010, 1:52 AM
kitchener-lrt's Avatar
kitchener-lrt kitchener-lrt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 699
Name wise, I'd like the new city to be named Berlin. There's history behind it, plus, the region is already named Waterloo.
__________________
Toronto FC Supporter
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted: Jan 10, 2010, 2:39 AM
Actonite Actonite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by kitchener-lrt View Post
Name wise, I'd like the new city to be named Berlin. There's history behind it, plus, the region is already named Waterloo.
While I see your point about history but why give our city the same name as some other place?

Amalgamation is about moving in a new direction why not a new name?

I like Grand River but hey wouldn't Kitchener-Waterloo work? That's what everyone knows us as any way.

It sure will be fun if we actually have to decide on a name for our united twin cities in the near future. I can live with any name. I'd be ecstatic just have the two cities amalgamated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted: Jan 10, 2010, 3:47 AM
timc timc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by DHLawrence View Post
Which is why merging the two will be the easiest amalgamation to accomplish; all you have to do is cross the street to go from one to the other. With Cambridge and the townships, there's still a rather large divide between them and KW, both physically and mentally, one that's likely to persist for a long time. (Interestingly, when Galt wanted the the new Preston-Hespeler-Galt-Blair city to be called 'Galt', Preston and Hespeler threatened to join Kitchener unless they compromised.)
Just hold on a second there. It's not all rainbows and lollipops. There are a lot of differences between Kitchener and Waterloo for two cities so close together.

Things like utilities: would I still be with Waterloo North Hydro, or Kitchener Wilmot Hydro? Union Gas or Kitchener Utilities? Two separate water systems, and the related issue of fluoridation.

Things like services: fire service rationalization between the communities. Waste collection. Street cleaning.

Planning, bylaws, permits, etc. are all managed separately.

Of course, taxes are also different between the two.

I'm not saying it can't be done, and in fact, there really shouldn't be all these differences between the two communities, which is a good reason for amalgamation in the first place. I'm just saying that there is a lot of work that would need to be done to make it happen.

BTW, my vote for name is 'Kitchener-Waterloo'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted: Jan 10, 2010, 3:55 AM
DHLawrence DHLawrence is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cambridge, Ontario
Posts: 906
But there will be a lot less work than there would be if all three cities were amalgamating.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:01 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.