HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > SSP: Local Portland > Downtown & City of Portland

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted: Mar 24, 2010, 3:32 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Go By Streetcar!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,973
how about the smart tower?
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted: Mar 24, 2010, 4:00 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,099
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
For instance, the largest building on the site, the four-story Convention Plaza that dates to 1926, probably will be retained instead of demolished. Parking lots and open space near it could be carved into lots as small as 30 by 85 feet and sold to individual builders who would erect new structures in the range of four to six stories.
This all sounds great, but how is this going to work - financially? If they can finance buildings like this without elevators, great - but I doubt they can, does anyone remember that ultragreen apt bldg on Williams that finally had to add an elevator to get financing? With such small floorplates - 30x85 - an elevator would be pretty expensive. To build and then to maintain. Maybe if two lots could share an elevator or something like that...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted: Mar 24, 2010, 4:43 AM
2oh1's Avatar
2oh1 2oh1 is offline
9-7-2oh1-!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: downtown Portland
Posts: 687
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
how about the smart tower?
How about the Smart Tower indeed. I'm not sure how it would fit into this project, but wow do I want that tower to happen somewhere prominent.

I have to be honest... I'm having trouble visualizing this latest version of the Burnside Bridgehead. I'm not against it by any means. I guess I just thought that thinking and doing big in that area would really serve as a catalyst. I'm not sure if or how this smaller eclectic concept would do that - but it's a good thing regardless. I realize big in this economy isn't realistic, and good grief, something has to happen with that land... except that, as the last few decades have proven, it's all too easy for nothing to happen. So, I'm excited by this latest proposal. I'm just having trouble picturing what it - and that entire area - will end up looking like. Hopefully my rambling made sense!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted: Mar 24, 2010, 4:59 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 1,893
I'm thinking of this concept/project as more of a complement than a catalyst. I'm not even sure what aspect of this area needs catalyzing. It already has a thriving industrial area nearby and that stretch of lower Burnside also feels pretty healthy with a bunch of great local businesses. Plus the u/c streetcar and the couplet. Seems like the scale of what Beam/PDC/Bruder/et al are proposing is more of an extension of what is already there, which is ideal in my opinion, rather than the much-greater-scaled project originally envisioned.

I'm really glad they're most likely saving both the older buildings (Union Arms was once slated for demo as well) because I think they'll add a lot to the immediate fabric and offer a pleasing new/old contrast. I'm excited to see how this pans out. It better!

I'm curious about the Smart Tower idea in general but 1) I highly doubt we'll ever see it get off the ground (dude can't even build his storage facility) and 2) I'm not sure about siting it at the east end of the Burnside bridge... and if it does get built, I hereby predict that it will "shrink" significantly in accordance with Portland tradition .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted: Mar 24, 2010, 5:05 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 1,893
Quote:
crow: still wonder how they are going to deal with that block made an island by the couplet - maybe a below ground connection, or maybe have a building bridge the street. As it is it is surrounded by fast traffic on all four sides - tough place for an active building...hopefully it won't become a lame ODOT parking median slash mediocre sculpture park.
I'm also extremely curious what the plan is for that halved block. I don't get it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted: Mar 24, 2010, 3:49 PM
Delaney's Avatar
Delaney Delaney is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by tworivers View Post
I'm also extremely curious what the plan is for that halved block. I don't get it.
For the time being the island is going to have a large art installation that is supposed to last for a couple of years. In the long run - who knows. The plans for the whole area are very loose, and will depend on market forces. Either way the growth will be incremental and not one big project. Works PA and Bruder have done a number of master plans that envision different levels of density growing over time. All schemes call for the Import Plaza building to remain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted: Apr 23, 2010, 2:21 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 992
new plan from the PDC

__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2010, 2:59 AM
crow's Avatar
crow crow is offline
momentum
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: portland
Posts: 521
so fixed stall count no matter what the scenario. AND I am sorry but that island created by the couplet is a throw away. The only way to really make use of that site is to either bridge over in some OMA way alla CCTV, or come underneath and poke up - neither seem very practical. This seems unrealistic in many ways...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2010, 4:16 AM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,369
I think that island should be a "sculpture park" of some sort.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2010, 4:56 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Go By Streetcar!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,973
If Vestas would pick up this site and build on it, I'd go nuts!
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted: Apr 25, 2010, 8:19 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 1,893
Yeah, I don't get the decision to run the couplet back to Burnside right through the middle of the block at all. Bizarre.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted: Apr 25, 2010, 2:59 PM
crow's Avatar
crow crow is offline
momentum
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: portland
Posts: 521
are there are any good examples of sculpture parks created by transportation engineers?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted: Apr 26, 2010, 4:22 PM
alexjon's Avatar
alexjon alexjon is offline
Bears of antiquity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Downtown/First Hill, Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,233
No.
__________________
"The United States is in no way founded upon the Christian religion." -- George Washington & John Adams in a diplomatic message to Malta
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted: Apr 26, 2010, 6:43 PM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NYC Metro
Posts: 8,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by crow View Post
are there are any good examples of sculpture parks created by transportation engineers?
Do highway interchanges count?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #155  
Old Posted: Apr 26, 2010, 7:26 PM
crow's Avatar
crow crow is offline
momentum
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: portland
Posts: 521
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife View Post
Do highway interchanges count?
yeah - actually they can be very sculptural...I love some the spaces beneath the I-405 in NW and on the other side of the river. The concrete columns and the ribbons of the overhead freeway are very sculptural.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #156  
Old Posted: May 2, 2010, 3:38 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Go By Streetcar!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,973
Friday, April 30, 2010
New plan takes shape for Burnside Bridgehead
Portland Business Journal - by Wendy Culverwell Business Journal staff writer

Five years after the Portland Development Commission teamed with Opus Northwest to transform the four blocks at the base of the Burnside Bridge into a glittery urban center, it is weighing a new plan with more modest goals.

The new plan taking shape emphasizes action and jobs, not condominiums, office towers and big box retailers.

“The idea is to get going sooner rather than later and spur redevelopment,” said Geraldene Moyle, senior project manager for PDC.

The agency is spending nearly $1 million per year on planning and preliminary development for the project. That will increase to $5 million in 2010-2011 as work gets going.

Remodeling Convention Plaza, an empty 100,000-square-foot office building once expected to be demolished, is the likely first project. Beam Development, PDC’s Bridgehead consultant, expects to propose a redevelopment plan for Convention Plaza as soon as the PDC adopts the framework plan, which could happen as early as May. Work could begin this fall.

Beam earned the right to develop up to 20 percent of the Burnside Bridgehead by serving as the PDC’s guide on the framework plan. PDC will solicit proposals from would-be partners for the balance of the site.

Beam president Brad Malsin said several unidentified tenants have lined up to occupy the building.

That’s music to the ears of the Central Eastside Industrial Council.

“Seeing anything happen is very positive at this point,” said Terry Taylor, the organization’s executive director.

In the long term, the Bridgehead plan allows the site to develop as market forces demand. In the beginning, projects will probably be low-key. As the economy improves, taller buildings could be included. No uses, including residential, have been ruled out. The zoning for the Burnside Bridgehead allows for up to 12 square feet of development for every square foot of land.

The $260 million Opus effort foundered when it couldn’t find tenants to anchor the effort and the development agreement expired. The 2005 plan presumed the entire site would be vacant and that Southeast Third Avenue would be closed to traffic.

The vision for condominiums, offices and large-format retailers did not sit well with neighboring businesses who want to retain the eastside’s gritty industrial character. The new plan honors that.

“The goal isn’t to change the industrial nature of the district. It’s not the next Pearl,” Moyle said.

Moyle said although the initial plan never came to pass, the effort wasn’t wasted. In the intervening five years, PDC and the city have learned more about the Central Eastside, its 17,000 jobs and have a much clearer picture of how the Portland Streetcar and Burnside Couplet will affect the neighborhood.

The Central Eastside is an incubator for the kinds of businesses the city wants to cultivate, such as manufacturing and apparel.
The new plan, Moyle said, is more appropriate

wculverwell@bizjournals.com | 503-219-3415

http://portland.bizjournals.com/port...ml?t=printable
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #157  
Old Posted: May 4, 2010, 7:10 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NYC Metro
Posts: 8,449
I have to say, I really like the eastside couplet, I have driven through it twice now...though I will say at first it is alittle odd because the configuration is so much different than it was, but it makes it feel like much nicer of an urban area and I could easily see new development from the Bridgehead all the way east past the Sandy reconfiguration area.

Also, the little island that is created in the couplet doesnt really seem like an island, it seems more like a small block within an urban system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #158  
Old Posted: May 4, 2010, 4:45 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 992
I actually like it as well. It reminds me of SE Morrison.
__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #159  
Old Posted: May 5, 2010, 6:03 PM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,369
I would personally be for the couplet all the way to W26th.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #160  
Old Posted: May 5, 2010, 9:32 PM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 1,481
W 26th? There is no W 26th.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > SSP: Local Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:39 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.