HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2008, 2:42 AM
miketoronto miketoronto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,249
ARC: The new trans-hudson train tunnel from N.J. to Manhattan. Video on the project

Check out the project on the ARC project at

http://arctunnel.com/video/


The website has great information in addition to the video.
This is a great project, as it puts the focus on maintaining Manhattan as the centre of the region, and improving transit to do this.
__________________
Miketoronto
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2008, 3:22 PM
Justin10000 Justin10000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 813
Yeah, I highly doubt Newark will take Manhattan's place anytime soon.

This is needed. The current entry points are at capacity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2008, 6:03 PM
Swede's Avatar
Swede Swede is offline
Chairperson YIMBY Sweden
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: sol.III.eu.se.08
Posts: 6,315
Great video. Which they'd do a similar one for the commuterrailtunnel they're starting to dig here.

Only doubt I'd have about the project is... connecting it eastward? wouldn't that be a good idea?
__________________
Forumers met so far:
Huopa, Nightsky, Jo, wolkenkrabber, ThisSideofSteinway, jacksom, New Jack City, LeCom, Ellatur, Jan, Dennis, Ace, Bardamu, AtlanticaC5, Ringil, Dysfunctional, stacey, karakhal, ch1le, Hviid, staff, kjetilab, Þróndeimr, queetz, FREKI, sander, Blue Viking, nomels, Mantas, ristov, Rafal_T, khaan, Chilenofuturista, Jonte Myra, safta20, AW, Pas, Jarmo K, IceCheese, Sideshow_Bob, sk, Ingenioren, Ayreonaut, Silver Creations, Hasse78, Svartmetall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2008, 12:00 AM
J. Will J. Will is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,799
They were considering adding two new tracks in each direction, but are only going with one new track in each direction. Hopefully there will be room to add another new track each way eventually. The video says ridership will double over the next 20 years, which would mean if it's already at capacity it will be again in 20 years, unless they start using larger trains.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2008, 5:18 AM
lazar22b lazar22b is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 24
Cool video and great project. It is very needed

However, if they are at capacity now, and are projecting the amount of people taking the train to double by 2020 is there any more immediate relief? This project isn't finished until 2017. By that time, won't they be near capacity once again. Seems like they should have just gone ahead with two double track tunnels rather then single track.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2008, 5:25 AM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 7,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazar22b View Post
Cool video and great project. It is very needed

However, if they are at capacity now, and are projecting the amount of people taking the train to double by 2020 is there any more immediate relief?
Yes, it is currently impossible to add new rush hour trains from NJ into Penn during peak rush hour, which is why they are doing the second tunnel.

Here's what NJ Transit is doing to cope until the tunnel opens:

1. Ordering only double-decker rail cars (about halfway completed).

2. Lengthening platforms at Penn and at key suburban stations (design completed, some funding, but no construction date).

3. Adding a new South Concourse at Penn to handle crowds (design completed, no funding or construction date).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Sep 17, 2008, 8:26 PM
tdawg's Avatar
tdawg tdawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 1,516
Cool video and a visionary project. I'd love to see this built in conjunction with the new Moynihan Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Sep 17, 2008, 9:17 PM
Lecom's Avatar
Lecom Lecom is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 12,497
That's great!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Sep 18, 2008, 12:10 AM
theWatusi's Avatar
theWatusi theWatusi is offline
Resident Jackass
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Your Mom's House
Posts: 11,320
Sweet. Maybe the prospect of a one seat ride into Penn will increase the chance of service to Scranton/Wilkes Barre and the Lehigh Valley.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2010, 8:25 PM
sciguy0504 sciguy0504 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 437
Can someone confirm this is now on-hold? If so, that would be a major disappointment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2010, 8:47 PM
J. Will J. Will is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,799
__________________
"I'm probably one of the most interesting, multi-faceted, and complicated people you will ever meet." -QuantumX
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2010, 10:54 PM
volguus zildrohar's Avatar
volguus zildrohar volguus zildrohar is offline
Be Cool Or Be Cast Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The City Of Philadelphia
Posts: 15,032
Following some links I came across this. Apparently some fol;ks don't see the tunnel as a good thing for NJ.
__________________
je suis phillytrax sur FLICKR, y'all
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2010, 12:32 AM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: In the Pascack Valley
Posts: 1,422
I used to be for this Project , but now i think its a waste. I rather have them expand Hoboken Terminal and Build a New station in the NJ Gold Coast. I think this project was poorly planned & should have been killed years ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2010, 1:14 AM
miketoronto miketoronto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,249
But would they need more capacity after this tunnel is built? As sad as it might be, Manhattan is going to hit a level where it won't be able to fit any more buildings or people.
So who knows this one new tunnel might be enough.
__________________
Miketoronto
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2010, 1:49 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Defend Equality!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 18,571
I'm surprised NJ Transit has only one track in each direction into and out of Manhattan.
__________________
SFMTA traffic count: 8am-9am, inbound Market Street @ Van Ness:
5/14/09: 776 bicycles
5/09/13: 1,067 bicycles
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2010, 2:01 AM
miketoronto miketoronto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by fflint View Post
I'm surprised NJ Transit has only one track in each direction into and out of Manhattan.
Until the 90's NJ was not much of a commuter market for NYC. But over the years many New Yorkers have left the city for the cheaper homes of NJ, and a whole new commuter market has started that was not there before.
I remember reading a report about NJ Transit and how their rail ridership has just skyrocketed over the last 20 years where before that they were not carrying as many people as most people did not commute between the two states for work.
__________________
Miketoronto
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2010, 2:04 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Defend Equality!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 18,571
PATH has been bringing commuters from Jersey into Manhattan for decades.
__________________
SFMTA traffic count: 8am-9am, inbound Market Street @ Van Ness:
5/14/09: 776 bicycles
5/09/13: 1,067 bicycles
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2010, 2:04 AM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: In the Pascack Valley
Posts: 1,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by miketoronto View Post
But would they need more capacity after this tunnel is built? As sad as it might be, Manhattan is going to hit a level where it won't be able to fit any more buildings or people.
So who knows this one new tunnel might be enough.
The Problem with the New Tunnel and station is it dips to deep and only adds 6 new tracks. Thats barely enough , considering Newark & Hoboken are bigger then that and at Capacity. The new station can't be expanded any further due to the New Water Tunnel. So my plan and many ppl in the Rail Community agree with my Expand Hoboken and and build a New Station somewhere in the NJ Gold Coast with connections to the Ferrys and PATH.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fflint View Post
I'm surprised NJ Transit has only one track in each direction into and out of Manhattan.
We have 2 , but we both share them with Amtrak which also plans on expanding and building New Tunnels into NYC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2010, 2:29 AM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Liver & Onions
Posts: 18,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by miketoronto View Post
But would they need more capacity after this tunnel is built? As sad as it might be, Manhattan is going to hit a level where it won't be able to fit any more buildings or people.
So who knows this one new tunnel might be enough.
err....really? details please. Have you ever been to Hong Kong or Tokyo or Seoul? A city can always fit more buildings and people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by miketoronto View Post
Until the 90's NJ was not much of a commuter market for NYC.
What the hell are you talking about? Assgassery?
__________________
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. -Donald Rumsfeld
Didn't you notice on the plane when you started talking, eventually I started reading the vomit bag?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2010, 2:46 AM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: In the Pascack Valley
Posts: 1,422
Over the Next 20-30 years NJT / West of the Hudson Metro-North will restore between 300-360miles of Rail. Only about 30% of that would feed into NY Penn , the rest would go to Hoboken Terminal which is 2x the size of NY Penn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:10 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.