Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 5:18 PM
|
 |
New Yorker for life
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 24,984
|
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/31/ny...1&ref=nyregion
A $40 Million Gift, a Proposed Bike Arena, and Now Skepticism in Brooklyn

The proposed site of Brooklyn Bridge Park’s velodrome.

Such track-cycling facilities drew huge crowds to sites around New York a century ago; only one remains, in Queens.
By LISA W. FODERARO
July 30, 2012
Quote:
Leaders of the major community groups in the neighborhoods abutting the park, including Brooklyn Heights and Dumbo, have questions about the track. They say they worry about the building’s size (with a footprint of up to 70,000 square feet, it is larger than a football field) and the traffic it might draw to the cobbled streets of Brooklyn Heights, while pointing out the relatively obscure nature of track cycling, in which riders on fixed-gear bicycles without brakes travel at terrific speeds around curves banked at 45-degree angles.
Some also doubt Mr. Rechnitz’s motives: a 47-year-old resident of the Upper West Side, he is an avid amateur track cyclist who has tried — and failed — to bring a velodrome to the city. Now, they say, he is buying the track he wants, on public land. “You can paint stripes on a horse, but that doesn’t make it a zebra,” said Peter Flemming, co-chairman of the independent Brooklyn Bridge Park Community Council and a resident of Brooklyn Heights. “Nor can calling this a ‘field house’ make it anything other than an Olympic-class track-cyling velodrome.”
Not everyone is against the proposed track. Joan L. Millman, a state assemblywoman who represents the area containing the park, said she supported it, in part because it would replace a rundown storage building near Pier 5 that she called an “eyesore.” But she confessed that, at first, she was not even sure what a velodrome was. “I had to go look it up,” she said. Regina Myer, president of the Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation, which governs land use in the park, emphasized that “it’s not taking away any green space; the plan always called for that location to be a maintenance building.”
|
|