HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture

    Federal Reserve Bank in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Boston Skyscraper Diagram
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2009, 4:56 AM
plinko's Avatar
plinko plinko is online now
them bones
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara adjacent
Posts: 6,626
BOSTON | Federal Reserve Bank Building | 614 FT / 187 M | 32 FLOORS | 1977

An anchor to the downtown Boston skyline (actually the tallest in DT Boston), the Federal Reserve Bank Building is a sleek, aluminum-skinned tower that looks more like a wall heater than a skyscraper.

Designed by Hugh Stubbins (Landmark Tower, Yokohama; Chase, Indianapolis), the building had major security requirements in the programming that required the first office floors to be substantially above street level. Giving these floors a similar treatment as Gunnar Birkerts did in Minneapolis four years earlier, Stubbins created a very slender vertical box with elevator cores at either end (kind of gives the building 'ears').

The tower was then given a very unique tri-angular shade element on the facade at each floor that has a very distinctive look. As I said, kind of like a wall heater.

The aluminum shines in the sun, and gives off a metallic hue in cloudy weather.

I'd have to say that this is probably my favorite tower architecturally in Boston. It doesn't have the purity or height of Hancock, but it's massing and materials due to program make it a subtle monster on the south end of the Boston skyline.











































__________________
Even if you are 1 in a million, there are still 7,000 people just like you...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2009, 6:13 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,538
I wish we could steal this and bring it to Chicago...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2009, 9:12 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is online now
vertical
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: unconventionally bicoastal
Posts: 10,328
It looks a lot newer than 1977. When I came across it heading to South Station, I really loved it, but I assumed it was just as old as the other recent buildings along Atlantic/Central Artery/Rose Kennedy Greenway or whatever the hell you call it.

Either way, it's wonderful. The aluminum gives a dappled appearance that looks fantastic. I wish more architects would use this material for their big flat surfaces.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2009, 3:26 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: AUSTIN
Posts: 36,048
I've always liked it. It's gotta be one of the most interesting buildings in Boston.
__________________
I like the Raleighs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2012, 12:30 AM
Guiltyspark's Avatar
Guiltyspark Guiltyspark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 656
I like it. It looks amazing at night as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2012, 1:42 AM
Larry King Larry King is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 158
it sucks
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2012, 5:29 AM
Jasoncw's Avatar
Jasoncw Jasoncw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 284
It's interesting that you mention Gunnar Birkerts. This building has the same massing for the same program as Minneapolis's Reserve building, but Birkerts had also designed an aluminum clad building (the IBM Building in Southfield, Michigan) with triangular sun shades. The sun shades were different though, they were integrated into the facade more and they were part of a bunch of other environment/performance related considerations.

But all together this fine building seems to be a combination of ideas found in those two Birkerts projects.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2012, 2:49 AM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
Khurram Parvaz
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,035
It's nothing overly special, especially a city the caliber of Boston should be proud of. Boston has been privileged with such rich history, yet tainted with b class brutalist high rises since the 70's. The other stands next to the Hancock Center. But not disgusting, either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2013, 1:24 AM
ThatOneGuy's Avatar
ThatOneGuy ThatOneGuy is offline
Come As You Are
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Constanta
Posts: 856
I've grown to ike this building. It's unique and has a cool shape/facade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2013, 1:55 AM
Shawn Shawn is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 3,561
One of my least-favorite towers in the city, but more because of it's location and "tower in the park" pedestal base than because I dislike the tower itself. Although I suppose a Fed Reserve building won't have the most accessible ground floor retail and such. It is impressive as you walk out of South Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2013, 4:47 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 19,796
I love this tower and always have. It was so very, very impressive for many years after it was built--quite prominent on the skyline from all angles before the subsequent infill over the decades gradually hid it from view from the north and partially from the west.
__________________
2014: the United States Supreme Court Imposes Corporate Sharia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2013, 5:48 AM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,587
Wow. Thanks for posting. I wasn't aware of this tower but I love it. Ardecila, you're spot on when you say it looks like something more recently built. And yeah, that aluminum has a great effect—really, the same as stone when used on large planar surfaces.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:44 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.