Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web. The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics. SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.
BOSTON | Federal Reserve Bank Building | 614 FT / 187 M | 32 FLOORS | 1977
An anchor to the downtown Boston skyline (actually the tallest in DT Boston), the Federal Reserve Bank Building is a sleek, aluminum-skinned tower that looks more like a wall heater than a skyscraper.
Designed by Hugh Stubbins (Landmark Tower, Yokohama; Chase, Indianapolis), the building had major security requirements in the programming that required the first office floors to be substantially above street level. Giving these floors a similar treatment as Gunnar Birkerts did in Minneapolis four years earlier, Stubbins created a very slender vertical box with elevator cores at either end (kind of gives the building 'ears').
The tower was then given a very unique tri-angular shade element on the facade at each floor that has a very distinctive look. As I said, kind of like a wall heater.
The aluminum shines in the sun, and gives off a metallic hue in cloudy weather.
I'd have to say that this is probably my favorite tower architecturally in Boston. It doesn't have the purity or height of Hancock, but it's massing and materials due to program make it a subtle monster on the south end of the Boston skyline.
Even if you are 1 in a million, there are still 7,000 people just like you...
It looks a lot newer than 1977. When I came across it heading to South Station, I really loved it, but I assumed it was just as old as the other recent buildings along Atlantic/Central Artery/Rose Kennedy Greenway or whatever the hell you call it.
Either way, it's wonderful. The aluminum gives a dappled appearance that looks fantastic. I wish more architects would use this material for their big flat surfaces.
__________________ la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
It's interesting that you mention Gunnar Birkerts. This building has the same massing for the same program as Minneapolis's Reserve building, but Birkerts had also designed an aluminum clad building (the IBM Building in Southfield, Michigan) with triangular sun shades. The sun shades were different though, they were integrated into the facade more and they were part of a bunch of other environment/performance related considerations.
But all together this fine building seems to be a combination of ideas found in those two Birkerts projects.
It's nothing overly special, especially a city the caliber of Boston should be proud of. Boston has been privileged with such rich history, yet tainted with b class brutalist high rises since the 70's. The other stands next to the Hancock Center. But not disgusting, either.
One of my least-favorite towers in the city, but more because of it's location and "tower in the park" pedestal base than because I dislike the tower itself. Although I suppose a Fed Reserve building won't have the most accessible ground floor retail and such. It is impressive as you walk out of South Station.
I love this tower and always have. It was so very, very impressive for many years after it was built--quite prominent on the skyline from all angles before the subsequent infill over the decades gradually hid it from view from the north and partially from the west.
"A single round-trip flight between Chicago and Frankfurt, Germany burns about 3.5 tons of carbon dioxide--that's about what a medium-sized car in the United States burns for an entire year." --Hari Sreenivasan, PBS NewsHour Weekend, Sunday April 13, 2014
Wow. Thanks for posting. I wasn't aware of this tower but I love it. Ardecila, you're spot on when you say it looks like something more recently built. And yeah, that aluminum has a great effect—really, the same as stone when used on large planar surfaces.