HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted: Nov 21, 2009, 6:08 AM
Thymant's Avatar
Thymant Thymant is offline
Aggie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dallas/San Antonio
Posts: 271
Wow, coming along fast!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted: Nov 23, 2009, 4:39 AM
SouthmoreAve's Avatar
SouthmoreAve SouthmoreAve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thymant View Post
Wow, coming along fast!
rather slow considering how long ago the project actually started, but im sure it will progress faster once it goes above ground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted: Nov 23, 2009, 6:53 PM
Wattleigh's Avatar
Wattleigh Wattleigh is online now
Poppity Pop Pop Pop!
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston - Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthmoreAve View Post
rather slow considering how long ago the project actually started, but im sure it will progress faster once it goes above ground.
I don't think it's all that slow given that it's a really compact site that is pretty deep, due to the two-level underground component.

For a site that's been active for only about five months, it's a bit quicker than expected from my perspective.
__________________
See a map of Houston-area projects (updated on occassion)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted: Nov 23, 2009, 7:29 PM
SouthmoreAve's Avatar
SouthmoreAve SouthmoreAve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wattleigh View Post
I don't think it's all that slow given that it's a really compact site that is pretty deep, due to the two-level underground component.

For a site that's been active for only about five months, it's a bit quicker than expected from my perspective.
It is compact, ill give you that, buts its not that tall.

But what do i know, ive only begun to follow construction projects since last year, so my experience and knowledge is naive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted: Nov 23, 2009, 8:14 PM
shakman's Avatar
shakman shakman is offline
Chairman
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Frederick, MD /Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,634
From experience in the construction industry, it takes time for a structure to come out of the hole. Once above grade, minus any stringent seimic requirements, structures tend to rise quick - from the ones have been on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted: Nov 23, 2009, 10:15 PM
Complex01's Avatar
Complex01 Complex01 is offline
Endless Moments...
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas...
Posts: 2,929
Almost on the ground floor. Yea...

__________________
Wizard's First Rule: People are stupid; given proper motivation, almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted: Dec 7, 2009, 2:26 AM
SouthmoreAve's Avatar
SouthmoreAve SouthmoreAve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 291
Looks like it's made some good progress.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted: Dec 7, 2009, 7:34 AM
JoninATX's Avatar
JoninATX JoninATX is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,308
not long now before we see the building rise above ground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted: Dec 7, 2009, 8:56 PM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Millvale, Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,636
So anyone know how tall its going to be, havent heard anything on that front? Its not going to be tall at all, I dont think, maybe only 240ft or so.
__________________
My fine art photography website : http://fineartamerica.com/profiles/c...itherland.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted: Dec 7, 2009, 9:17 PM
salaverryo salaverryo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 59
About 23/24 floors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted: Dec 7, 2009, 9:27 PM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Millvale, Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,636
I was at the ground breaking ceremony a long time ago and they said it was going to be 19 stories, has it changed back to the original plans again?
__________________
My fine art photography website : http://fineartamerica.com/profiles/c...itherland.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted: Dec 8, 2009, 12:45 AM
SouthmoreAve's Avatar
SouthmoreAve SouthmoreAve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 291
We havent even seen a good rendering yet, and this thing is almost on ground floor! But, if it looks anything like that hand-drawn(?) image, i'll be pleased. Quality over quantity, please! I'd rather get this 200 footer than a 500 ft box.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted: Dec 8, 2009, 1:48 AM
AstrosFreak's Avatar
AstrosFreak AstrosFreak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh - Houston
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthmoreAve View Post
We havent even seen a good rendering yet, and this thing is almost on ground floor! But, if it looks anything like that hand-drawn(?) image, i'll be pleased. Quality over quantity, please! I'd rather get this 200 footer than a 500 ft box.
I'd definitely agree with that. For me, the deal breaker is going to be the cladding. If it looks cheap, this building could turn out pretty terrible, and with such a prominent location, I'm hoping they make the right call.

Plus, height wont really be a big deal there. If it's a little short, that's fine. We'll just have some other buildings behind it going taller to get a view of the park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted: Dec 8, 2009, 6:37 AM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Millvale, Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,636
I looked everywhere on the internet and even the developer of this project had no info on this building, strange, and emporis only had that it was under construction but had 22 floors, so guessing that each floor will be roughly 13 ft, it should be around 290 ft.
__________________
My fine art photography website : http://fineartamerica.com/profiles/c...itherland.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted: Dec 8, 2009, 2:03 PM
shakman's Avatar
shakman shakman is offline
Chairman
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Frederick, MD /Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,634
Hotels and residential structures tend to have less than 13 ft per floor - minus any roof top structure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted: Dec 8, 2009, 7:46 PM
Complex01's Avatar
Complex01 Complex01 is offline
Endless Moments...
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas...
Posts: 2,929
Well it should be a nice height, but i do wish there was a better rendering out. I guess we will wait and see...

But i do hope the will keep the spire. I like it...
__________________
Wizard's First Rule: People are stupid; given proper motivation, almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted: Dec 10, 2009, 1:44 AM
SouthmoreAve's Avatar
SouthmoreAve SouthmoreAve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 291
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakman View Post
Hotels and residential structures tend to have less than 13 ft per floor - minus any roof top structure.
Makes sense, luckily, this hotel has a roof top structure AND a (mini)spire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted: Dec 11, 2009, 1:25 AM
mfastx mfastx is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 223
Construction looks slow, but it should pick up when it reaches ground level.

This is my first post BTW, looking foward to watching this project. The less parking lots, the better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted: Dec 11, 2009, 3:24 AM
shakman's Avatar
shakman shakman is offline
Chairman
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Frederick, MD /Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,634


Welcome aboard. Buckle up and enjoy the ride.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted: Dec 12, 2009, 1:31 AM
SouthmoreAve's Avatar
SouthmoreAve SouthmoreAve is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 291
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfastx View Post
Construction looks slow, but it should pick up when it reaches ground level.

This is my first post BTW, looking foward to watching this project. The less parking lots, the better.
You picked just the right time to join and watch this project go up, since it will soon reach ground level.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:03 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.