HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > SSP: Local Portland > Downtown & City of Portland

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted: Nov 20, 2009, 8:23 PM
NJD's Avatar
NJD NJD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 582
This article is mostly about the Streetcar, but is a good sign the OSC is moving forward...


City is eager to get Portland streetcar turned around
DJC Thursday, November 19, 2009



Planners of the Portland Streetcar Loop never wanted the streetcar to travel the wrong way on a one-way street near Portland State University.

But the temporary alignment along Fourth Avenue between Montgomery and Harrison streets was meant to be just that - temporary, according to Rick Gustafson, director of operations for the Portland Streetcar project.

The plan always had been for the tracks to cut through a site bounded by Southwest Montgomery and Harrison streets to the north and south, and Southwest Fourth and Fifth avenues to the east and west. But before this year, there was no official plan for a building on the site.

“When you’re putting a streetcar in the middle of a block, you need the building proposal,” Gustafson said. “Now that the configuration has been set for the Oregon Sustainability Center, there’s work being done to secure financial resources to build the real alignment.”

The city of Portland has submitted an application for a $2.55 million ConnectOregon III grant to help pay for the $4 million project to realign the streetcar track diagonally through the site of the future Oregon Sustainability Center, much like the track currently cuts through PSU’s urban plaza. The streetcar’s current single track would be replaced with a double track to allow two-way travel through the Oregon Sustainability Center site.

But besides providing a dramatic entrance to the center, the realignment will improve traffic flow in the area, according to Shoshanah Oppenheim of the Portland Bureau of Transportation’s streetcar project management team.

“Removing the tracks on Fourth and Montgomery will allow us to manage the flow of traffic for pedestrians, cars and trains better,” Oppenheim said. “There are conflict points with the contraflow of the streetcar there, as well as the moving of pedestrians around Harrison and Fourth Avenue.”

Traffic jams near a streetcar stop at the transit mall at Fifth Avenue and Montgomery Street are a frequent occurrence with the current streetcar alignment, Gustafson said. If a streetcar stops on the transit mall’s only lane of auto traffic, an increasing line of vehicles begins to form behind the idling streetcar.

“It’s a hazard because cars start to consider driving into the light-rail section to avoid the streetcar,” Gustafson said.

Oppenheim says the realignment project is in a good position to take a slice of the $100 million ConnectOregon III pie. The program will award grants to non-highway transportation projects that improve connections between the highway system and other modes of transportation, as well as projects that improve the flow of traffic and remove delays. The remaining cost of the project will be paid for with South Parks Blocks Urban Renewal Area tax increment financing allotted for the Oregon Sustainability Center.

The city’s application for a ConnectOregon III grant will be reviewed by the Oregon Department of Transportation in the first quarter of 2010. Final review is scheduled for June 2010 and a decision is expected to be made in August 2010.

Damin Tarlow of Gerding Edlen, who is working on the development of the Oregon Sustainability Center, says the new alignment can bring visitors from all over to the doorstep of Portland’s most sustainable building without ever having to enter a car.

“When someone flies in to PDX from around the world, they will be able to get from the airport to the Oregon Sustainability Center by MAX and streetcar,” Tarlow said. “All of the parts and pieces are coming together.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted: Nov 21, 2009, 8:01 AM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 1,481
Can't wait for this to start construction. I'll be able to see this building (and Russia) from my house.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted: Jan 25, 2010, 8:43 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 1,893
Local officials take Oregon Sustainability Center message to D.C.
Delegation seeks federal funds to help build the $120 million project

The Portland Tribune, Jan 25, 2010

An Oregon delegation that includes Portland Mayor Sam Adams, Portland State University President Wim Wiewel, Nancy Hamilton of Gov. Ted Kulongoski’s office, Janet Gagnon of Solar World and several local entrepreneurs travel Washington, D.C., this week to lobby for money to build the proposed $120 million Oregon Sustainability Center.

The center is expected to serve as both a technological model and a hub for sustainable practices, policy, education, research and entrepreneurship. The building to house the center also will be considered sustainable and meet the rigorous certification protocol of the Cascadia Green Building Council’s Living Building Challenge.

“The Oregon Sustainability Center is an on-the-ground example of green jobs and sustainability leadership,” Adams said. “Our time in Washington, D.C., will help us identify the champions and funding opportunities to help make the Center a reality.”

The delegation plans to meet Monday and Tuesday with representatives of the Department of Energy, the Department of Commerce, Housing and Urban Development, the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Green Building Council.

A reception is planned Monday evening at the U.S. Green Building Council’s headquarters, sponsored by the Portland Sustainability Institute, U.S. Green Building Council, Oregon BEST, Ball Janik LLP and Lane Powell. It will highlight the sustainability center building and Oregon’s leadership in sustainability.

“We’re eager to help Oregon and the Portland metro region extend its leadership in creating livable communities and a green economy, by sharing the Oregon Sustainability Center’s clean energy jobs and innovation message,” said Janet Gagnon, government relations manager for Solar World, which last year opened a new plant in Hillsboro.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted: Feb 2, 2010, 10:39 AM
RoseCtyRoks's Avatar
RoseCtyRoks RoseCtyRoks is offline
shozbot!
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: City Of Roses
Posts: 207
I'm wondering how the lobbying is going in D.C. this week, for some federal $$ to help with this project. Anyone think it would be a hard sell, with the EGWW Federal Bldg project already receiving so much attention and money?

The folks at SERA especially, will certainly be busy for a while with projects like these going forward. I heard that there were some possible design glitches? changes?....not that it's totally back to the drawing board, but something that could definitely slow this down a bit. I'm sure hoping it's not the case.... Anyone hear anything similar?


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted: Feb 3, 2010, 7:17 AM
awg awg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Downtown PDX
Posts: 141
Quote:
I'm wondering how the lobbying is going in D.C. this week, for some federal $$ to help with this project. Anyone think it would be a hard sell, with the EGWW Federal Bldg project already receiving so much attention and money?

The folks at SERA especially, will certainly be busy for a while with projects like these going forward. I heard that there were some possible design glitches? changes?....not that it's totally back to the drawing board, but something that could definitely slow this down a bit. I'm sure hoping it's not the case.... Anyone hear anything similar?
Where did you hear that from? I haven't heard anything like that... but the building wasn't "designed". My understanding was the goal was to evaluate whether or not a living building at that scale was possible (turns out yes, that appears possible).

If the answer was yes, the next question was how much would it cost and could tenants be found to pay the premium rent a building like that would need to command. The trip back east was probably to see if federal money could make the premium smaller.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted: Feb 3, 2010, 3:41 PM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NYC Metro
Posts: 8,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by awg View Post
Where did you hear that from? I haven't heard anything like that... but the building wasn't "designed". My understanding was the goal was to evaluate whether or not a living building at that scale was possible (turns out yes, that appears possible).

If the answer was yes, the next question was how much would it cost and could tenants be found to pay the premium rent a building like that would need to command. The trip back east was probably to see if federal money could make the premium smaller.
Well in technicality, that is what lobbying is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 1:12 AM
crow's Avatar
crow crow is offline
momentum
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: portland
Posts: 521
bump..
some early elevation studies, which show how the different exposures are treated. I think the east and west elevations are especially intriguing how the skin wraps and changes from southern to northern exposure.




This project is rumored to be going into Schematic Design early this spring...although it may be a different size and shape while still chasing the Living Building Challenge.

Last edited by crow; Mar 10, 2010 at 4:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 5:00 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 1,893
^^^Hey, what happened to the other three views?

I mean, thank you for posting them in the first place. I really liked the north elevation. How do you engineer a dramatically cantilevered solar roof like that that is also seismically sound?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 10:08 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NYC Metro
Posts: 8,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by tworivers View Post
^^^Hey, what happened to the other three views?

I mean, thank you for posting them in the first place. I really liked the north elevation. How do you engineer a dramatically cantilevered solar roof like that that is also seismically sound?
Dont worry too much about it being seismically sound, from the sounds of it, Portland would be wrapped in so much chaos to even notice if that thing came down.

Actually I am really impressed to see some architecture that is actually trying to visually push itself in Portland at this scale.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 2:50 PM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,098
i hope it's just the drawing, because i've liked the renderings i've seen up until this one, but this looks to me kind of 80's almost. in a bad way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 3:15 PM
crow's Avatar
crow crow is offline
momentum
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: portland
Posts: 521
Quote:
Originally Posted by bvpcvm View Post
i hope it's just the drawing, because i've liked the renderings i've seen up until this one, but this looks to me kind of 80's almost. in a bad way.
80's - really? that is a funny thing to say. i think the elevations give a better look at how the curved shape actually changes as it wraps. I think you also have to be careful how much you read into either technique of rendering. They can be deceptive.

20 ft deep trusses hold the array in place, and of course seismically strengthened with lateral trusses as well. No visions of 2012 coming from the top of the building.

I took the other three elevations off, b/c they were big and I was trying to re-size them, but now photobucket is creating some trouble...I will insert them later.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 4:08 PM
Delaney's Avatar
Delaney Delaney is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 125
I think they should make it more visually chaotic. It needs another dozen moves on top of the two dozen moves they've already made.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 4:38 PM
crow's Avatar
crow crow is offline
momentum
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: portland
Posts: 521
delete

Last edited by crow; Mar 11, 2010 at 9:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 4:41 PM
crow's Avatar
crow crow is offline
momentum
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: portland
Posts: 521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delaney View Post
I think they should make it more visually chaotic. It needs another dozen moves on top of the two dozen moves they've already made.
...snarky

feel free to peck away Delaney

Last edited by crow; Mar 10, 2010 at 5:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 7:19 PM
PacificNW's Avatar
PacificNW PacificNW is online now
Inhabited Sculpture
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florence, Oregon
Posts: 2,885
I like how this center is turning out but I think the comment posted by Delaney is funny.
__________________
"I had this job once where I had to attach things together with small pieces of metal. It was riveting."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 8:09 PM
mmeade mmeade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland
Posts: 78
I'd really love to see these renderings with a bit more context. The apartment building on the block may not be the prettiest thing to look at, but it isn't going away. Also, it would be interesting to see how this compares with the heights of the buildings surrounding it on either sides.

For a building that makes so much about solar and wind access, I would think that this type of thinking must be taking place. I only wish it would show up in the renderings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 8:18 PM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NYC Metro
Posts: 8,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmeade View Post
I'd really love to see these renderings with a bit more context. The apartment building on the block may not be the prettiest thing to look at, but it isn't going away. Also, it would be interesting to see how this compares with the heights of the buildings surrounding it on either sides.

For a building that makes so much about solar and wind access, I would think that this type of thinking must be taking place. I only wish it would show up in the renderings.
I actually love that little apartment building, how many old wood structure buildings does Portland have left in its downtown?

Also, how would solar and wind show up in a rendering?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 9:52 PM
mmeade mmeade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland
Posts: 78
Sorry, I didn't intend to come off so negative about the apartment building. It may be the exact polar opposite of this tower though, and I am curious as to how the two will relate to eachother. It is curiously absent in almost all the renderings I have seen of the Sustainability Center.

For the second question, buildings cast shadows, both with light and wind. If my memory serves, the prevailing winds in Portland through the warm months tend to come from the West/NW. The new PSU rec center sits directly west of the building and will affect the first few floors of the tower. The new tower may be set back enough, and the rec center might be far enough away that this doesn't matter. It's hard to tell without seeing it. One thing is for sure though, until the rest of the neighborhood is built up this building will dwarf most of the development around it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2010, 9:57 PM
crow's Avatar
crow crow is offline
momentum
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: portland
Posts: 521
the montage renderings certainly show the context, but in reality the surrounding structures should show up in the elevations - that would be helpful. As for solar access, this building certainly takes away the solar opportunity of the two story motel to the north.



Conversely if something above current zoning was built on the block on the southside of Harrison, then the net zero energy of the OSC would be compromised. maybe solar zoning, or air rights being purchased need to be a part of the discussion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted: Mar 11, 2010, 4:47 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Go By Streetcar!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,970
Hmmm, kinda looks like they took the roof from the Rose Garden, added solar panels, and stuck it on this building. LOL...Still excited about it though!
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > SSP: Local Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:57 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.