HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum

Since 1999, the SkyscraperPage Forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web. The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics. Welcome!

You are currently browsing as a guest. Register with the SkyscraperPage Forum and join this growing community of skyscraper enthusiasts. Registering has benefits such as fewer ads, the ability to post messages, private messaging and more.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise & Supertall Proposals

    

SugarHouse Casino Hotel in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Philadelphia Skyscraper Diagram
Philadelphia Projects & Construction Forum
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2009, 12:29 PM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
The Hammer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Polis Philou Adelfou
Posts: 4,044
PHILADELPHIA | Sugarhouse Casino Phase 3 | 300 ft

UPDATE 12/20/11: The current site plan is below, from PlanPhilly. Larger image found at source.



ORIGINAL POST: Well...it will have a green roof. Hopefully.

Renders from howardmodels.com



From http://www.planphilly.com/node/8618 (snip):
Quote:
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers says it's satisfied – again - with the archaeology done at the SugarHouse site and no further digging needs to happen before a permit is issued.

This doesn't mean the Corps is close to deciding whether or not to give SugarHouse the permit it needs to build its casino project as planned. The Corps also looks at environmental and other issues, and some are still outstanding. But if the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission and federal Advisory Council on Historic Preservation concur with the Corps' assessment, it will mean SugarHouse has satisfied the federal requirement for a historical review of its Delaware Avenue.

“We're certainly hopeful, but we'll take our directions from the Army Corps,” said SugarHouse spokeswoman Leigh Whitaker.

While SugarHouse is pleased, some of the consulting parties – a group of local historians, neighborhood activists and archaeologists who advise the historic review process – are not.

“It's a farce,” consulting party Torben Jenk, a preservationist and amateur historian, said of the process.

The Corps previously announced its satisfaction with the dig last August. That action peeved the consulting parties, who were frustrated that the Corps had taken this step, and others, without an in-person meeting. This was especially true since many of the consulting parties – including Jenk and Philadelphia Archaeological Forum President Douglas Mooney – had long been dissatisfied with the archaeological work done by SugarHouse archaeologist consultant A.D. Marble of Conshohocken.
And from http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?se...cal&id=6731967:
Quote:
PHILADELPHIA - March 27, 2009 - -- One of Philadelphia's proposed slot-machine casinos has received its first construction permit from the city.

Developers of the SugarHouse Casino were issued a foundation permit for the construction site on the Delaware River waterfront on Friday.

SugarHouse spokeswoman Leigh Whitaker says it will be a few weeks before developers are able to discuss a construction timeline, including laying the foundation.

Civic groups and city officials have challenged the locations of SugarHouse and the city's other proposed casino, Foxwoods Casino Philadelphia.
Discuss.

Location: 1000 block of N. Columbus Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA
Tenant: SugarHouse Casino (no duh)
Architect: ?
Status: Permits & Site Prep Interim Phase Complete; Phase 1(A?) proposed
__________________
CCME | CtL | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)

Last edited by hammersklavier; Dec 21, 2011 at 3:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2009, 9:14 PM
1SharpeMan's Avatar
1SharpeMan 1SharpeMan is offline
Just call me "Sharpie"
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bucks County
Posts: 37
NOw, this is just electronic gameas and slots, right? This place, for now, will not have any "real gaming tables for some time?
I hope I am wrong!
__________________
Just call me "Sharpie"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2009, 9:18 PM
phillyscooter phillyscooter is offline
Loma Prieta quakesurvivor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 79
The Sugar House font makes me think of Porky's and a 1960 Supermarket entrance at the same time....
__________________
I choose not the suffocating anesthetic of the suburbs, but the violent jolt of the Capital, that is my choice. - from the motion picture, the hours
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2009, 2:01 AM
Ninjawho's Avatar
Ninjawho Ninjawho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 527
Its been a while since we talked about the riverfront development...but...did the casinos submit redesigns to better interact with the Praxis plan or was the Praxis plan around the casinos?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2009, 7:26 AM
tua21506 tua21506 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: philadelphia -umm loft district/chinatown, i don't know what its called
Posts: 216
Parking garage

WOW just what everyone always wanted on the water front a massive parking garage...lol......well at least it is going to bring in revenue for the city......I too hope there is a re-design in accordance with the Penn Praxis plans....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2009, 8:29 AM
kilbride102 kilbride102 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NE Philly
Posts: 188
If i recall, Penn Praxis doesn't have any teeth so Sugarhouse can build what they want as long as they get the permits from the city
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2009, 8:23 PM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
The Hammer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Polis Philou Adelfou
Posts: 4,044
Yes indeed. Penn Praxis has no physical teeth whatsoever insofar as already-permitted developments are exempted from the plan. Nutter has endorsed it, though, and several of its early recommendations are moving forward. Insofar as SugarHouse is concerned, though, they do have the ability to build and ignore the city, but I'm hopeful the city can prevail upon them for better massing/siting on their spot.
__________________
CCME | CtL | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2009, 8:32 PM
Plokoon11 Plokoon11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 957
Is this really under construction? Or are they still digging for historical importances?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2009, 6:30 AM
bucks native's Avatar
bucks native bucks native is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NEPA Valley
Posts: 1,298
Those look like cars, not trees, on top of the parking garage. Piece of crap!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2009, 3:03 AM
brenster brenster is offline
i heart philly
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dillsburg,PA
Posts: 148
i thought i remember reading something saying that the parking was going to be moved away from the casino and they were working with the penn praxis recommendations.
__________________
I heart Philly
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2009, 8:13 PM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
The Hammer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Polis Philou Adelfou
Posts: 4,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plokoon11 View Post
Is this really under construction? Or are they still digging for historical importances?
No building yet. They just got a key permit, though.

What I would to improve this...
1.) Make the garage smaller.
2.) Make the garage smaller.
3.) Bring it out to the street.
4.) Stick some retail on its streetside.
5.) Put a walking trail between it and the river.
6.) Make the garage smaller.
7.) Put a green roof on top of the garage.
__________________
CCME | CtL | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 12:08 PM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
The Hammer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Polis Philou Adelfou
Posts: 4,044
From http://www.metro.us/us/article/2009/...8-85/index.xml:
Quote:
The state Gaming Control Board will hear from the two developers planning to build slots parlors in the city this week to find out where their long-delayed plans stand.

The status hearing is on Wednesday morning in Harrisburg.

A state court last month put a special master in charge of overseeing the SugarHouse Casino project to make sure the city wasn't slowing it from starting to build. The city issued the casino a foundation permit to begin work late last month.

Meanwhile, Foxwoods Casino is still putting its plans together to attempt to get state approval to build its project on Market East instead of along the Delaware River waterfront.
__________________
CCME | CtL | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 1:05 PM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
The Hammer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Polis Philou Adelfou
Posts: 4,044
From http://www.planphilly.com/node/8633
Quote:
PGCB time change flap, more blame game

The starting time of Wednesday’s Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board meeting – at which SugarHouse and Foxwoods casino interests have been asked to detail why they have yet to open – has been moved up from 11 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.

The switch angered some local activists who plan to show up by the busload and believe the time change was made to discourage Philadelphia residents from making the trip to Harrisburg. But the Control Board says the change was necessary to get other business out of the way, and the Philadelphia casino discussion won’t happen until about 11 a.m.

“We find it already shameful that the PGCB plans to hold a public meeting on Philadelphia casinos outside our city,” says a press statement released by Asian Americans United on Friday. "In addition, the PGCB has announced that there will be no opportunity for public comment. But this latest move further demonstrates PGCB’s determination to thwart public participation.”

Gaming Control Board spokesman Doug Harbach said the PGCB has a full agenda, and so it decided to start early so the meeting doesn’t run too late. The items not related to SugarHouse and Foxwoods will be dealt with first, he said, and so the discussion that many from Philadelphia want to hear “is not going to happen until 11 or later, anyway,” he said.

AAU also questions why there will be no public comment period. Harbach said this is standard procedure at a regular board meeting. The Board has held regular meetings outside of Harrisburg, Harbach said, but that involves spending state money on travel and overnight accomodations - expenses that won't be incurred during this budget crunch. If this was a hearing on a petition regarding a Philadelphia casino, the meeting would be held in Philadelphia, he said. Hearings also include time for public comment period.

“If (a Philadelphia casino) requests a significant change to the condition of their license, such as moving to a different location, we will come into the city,” he said.

A hearing is likely on the horizon for both SugarHouse and Foxwoods. SugarHouse’s operating license expired late last year. The casino has asked for an extension. There will be a hearing, which has not yet been scheduled, before the board makes a decision.

Foxwoods’ operating license will expire this summer. Foxwoods’ license is for a site at Columbus Boulevard and Reed Street, along the riverfront in South Philadelphia. But under pressure from the city, Foxwoods agreed to explore an alternative location: Either at the Burlington Coat Factory or the former Strawbridge’s site at Market East.

City officials once hoped to persuade SugarHouse to move off of the waterfront, too. But they have recently said they have given up that effort, and now hope to convince the casino to make some design changes that will make the slots operation more compatible with the city’s long-term goals for waterfront development.

Harbach said he tried to reach Casino-Free Philadelphia this morning to alert them of the reasons for the time change Wednesday, and that State Rep. Michael O’Brien was trying to reach AAU board member Helen Gym.

Both casinos have blamed city government for delays in construction. Each took that argument to the State Supreme Court. The administration denies stalling and says it wants to get SugarHouse and Foxwoods up and running as quickly as possible. The High Court sided with the casinos in both cases and appointed a Special Master to act as a go-between as the casinos deal with the city.

Friday afternoon, O'Brien and Sen. Lawrence Farnese announced that they wrote to the Gaming Control Board with their observations on why Philadelphia does not yet have an open casino.

The Board should blame the casinos, not the city or others who “have intervened on behalf of affected residents” for the delays, a press statement says.

Both lawmakers oppose the board-approved riverfront locations for SugarHouse and Foxwoods and are working to have the casinos relocated to other sites within Philadelphia.
In their letter, O'Brien and Farnese elaborated on various permits the gaming operators have not received for their sites. "Sugarhouse has chosen its location, a location fraught with problems which seems to have no end in sight," the letter states.

The letter says Foxwoods’ original chosen location also has many problems, and the legislators are pleased that Foxwoods is now focused on a new location.

But Asian Americans United, Casino-Free Philadelphia, and other groups that have fought against the casinos hate the Market East site, too. They say that just like the waterfront sites, Market East is too close to residential neighborhoods.

The location of Wednesday's Gaming Control Board meeting remains the same:The State Museum Auditorium at 303 North Street in Harrisburg. The PGCB moved the meeting to the auditorium in expectation of a large crowd.
__________________
CCME | CtL | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 1:21 PM
pwp pwp is offline
Hello.
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Philly
Posts: 425
With respect to a potential redesign in alignment with the Penn-Praxis recommendations, SugarHouse said at one point it'd be open to reconsidering their plans. But that was a few months back and could have been an empty statement. Who knows.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 9:09 PM
We Got Five We Got Five is offline
Western Suburbs
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,003
Quote:
Ye but if you realize that if they build this possible a building boom could emerge along the water front.
They might build another Slot House on the riverfront...we'll never see walkable riverfront with condo's, hotels, townhouses, etc...no one will want to live next to a slot house.

Can you imagine a neon "SUGARHOUSE" sign next the Ben Franklin Bridge? My god, I cringe. Most of my distaste comes from the lazy lingo regarding "tax revenue." Bring companies here, cut taxes, and create jobs. Slot revenue is a failed stop gap.

---------------------------------------

I don't want to start an anti-casino rant...I'm just concerned about our city. We're not a savvy bunch and my fear is that this endeavor will cripple the momentum we have going for us right now.
__________________
Philadelphia City Council raises taxes for the a 4th straight year! We will never learn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 9:16 PM
Plokoon11 Plokoon11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 957
Man no wonder in the simcity games I put down casinos and my advisors always yelled at me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 9:39 PM
brenster brenster is offline
i heart philly
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dillsburg,PA
Posts: 148
__________________
I heart Philly
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 11:42 PM
DocAwesome's Avatar
DocAwesome DocAwesome is offline
The Doctor Is In
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Franklintown
Posts: 113
Table Games is to Slots, as:
A) Permanent Casino is to "Temporary" casino

Did we just give carte blanche to put up a cheap slot box "temporarily"? Pros and cons of the casinos aside, ay meu deus.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2009, 3:56 AM
kilbride102 kilbride102 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NE Philly
Posts: 188
The casino at Philly Park is a tempoary one , I think. I believe that they are now starting to build the permanent casino with more slot capacity and the possiblity to accomidate table games in the future. I would assume that Sugarhouse would do the same thing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2009, 4:41 AM
Pennsgrant Pennsgrant is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by We Got Five View Post
They might build another Slot House on the riverfront...we'll never see walkable riverfront with condo's, hotels, townhouses, etc...no one will want to live next to a slot house.

Can you imagine a neon "SUGARHOUSE" sign next the Ben Franklin Bridge? My god, I cringe. Most of my distaste comes from the lazy lingo regarding "tax revenue." Bring companies here, cut taxes, and create jobs. Slot revenue is a failed stop gap.

---------------------------------------

I don't want to start an anti-casino rant...I'm just concerned about our city. We're not a savvy bunch and my fear is that this endeavor will cripple the momentum we have going for us right now.

I dont think they have the money for a neon sign. Looking at the plans of Sugarhouse that lot is poised to be 80% surface parking lots. The interem phase that they plan to shoot up is absolutely hideous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
   
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise & Supertall Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:36 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.