Quote:
Originally Posted by Zionide
1) I'm not sure what that has to do with the issue. I was referring to the people who, in the last two days, expressed what I perceived to be indifference or nonchalance in regard to the sign. If those individuals were part of the "pity party" originally, expressing indifference now is quite a change. Most urban enthusiasts I know are passionate enough about their views that they don't "get over" these things easily... hell, I'm still annoyed about the demolition of the Newhouse (28 years ago) and I'm still downright pissed about the demolition of the Utah Savings and Trust Building in 1991.
2) I didn't come late; I've been here two years longer than you have. Granted, I missed some discussion earlier this year when I didn't stop by for a couple months.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zionide
.
I'm surprised some of you urban enthusiasts are so okay with losing some pretty hefty neon signage for the supposed comfort of a relative few people---people who knew beforehand what they were getting view-wise.
|
Someone reading your above statement that I bolded could interpret it 2 ways:
1) I can't believe 100% people here don't agree with me! (which, of course, never happens ever with anything here).
2) I can't believe you guys aren't all instantly as pissed off as I am about this when I heard about it only a few days ago (the Michael Scott reaction).
Either one seemed to warrant my snarkyness / teasing (I'm sure you understand, you seem like a
kindred spirit in that regard).