i guess you're right.
it's not as though the mainsteam media would promote one candidate as honest, intelligent, youthful, forward thinking, popular... and the other as extremist, racist, corrupt, stupid, deceitful, fringe...
it's not as though Hollywood or the 'pink glove' do exactly the same; endorse one ideology, ridicule the other. -same with 'print'.
so it can't
be media driven.
(funny; up here in canada -gov.funded cbc
just adores the tories and lambastes the grits & socialist party)
some folks are excused of 'lemming' behaviour if they really ,really want to elect a FIRST (fill-in-the-blank
with all due respect to that long forgotten american M.L.King, 'content of character' ain't where it's at no more.
Damn your principles, vote your colour/race!
regarding "not checking out the presentation first", you're right. i didn't. sorry for having been so irrelevent. i'm canadian.
i have checked out this most excellent presentation since, however. great stuff. (love the expose about south philly & east L.A. bunch of uneducated hillbillies) very
accurate. eg. Q
oes race affect your vote? = effects the vote 'negatively'
(what if these rednecks just wanted to vote for the first.... octogenarian? nevermind)
like you, i'm sold.
we libs are so enlightened, so progressive, because we're exposed to and seek out such wisdom.
yes, it's because the cons/republicans have always been, still are, the party of slavery, segregation, secession and now, socialism!
wow. nate went trolling for racism and found some! -good job.