HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2009, 5:37 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,352
Renaissance Stuck on First Base (Washington Post)

Renaissance Stuck on First Base

Close to Nationals Park, SE Riverfront Area's Promise Has Drawn Residents, but Few Amenities Have Followed

By Lisa Rein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, September 13, 2009

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...091202457.html

Jack Whitsitt might just have the best view in Washington. From his building's rooftop pool at dusk, he sees the shimmering dome of the U.S. Capitol, planes landing at Reagan National Airport, the Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery --and nearby, the center-field lights of the new Nationals Park.

In May, Whitsitt and his wife moved into Onyx on First, a new condominium tower in Southeast, wowed by the full-circle panorama of the Potomac and Anacostia rivers from the top of the city's newest neighborhood. But something is tarnishing that glorious view: a giant crane suspended in the sky above L and First streets, left by a developer whose half-built office project went bust this summer. Fourteen stories below, new street lamps light empty sidewalks on a Friday night.

Baseball was supposed to transform the riverfront, a mile south of the Capitol, from a seedy backwater of warehouses, public housing and strip joints into a busy cityscape of restaurants, clubs, shops and 24-7 entertainment. But some developers who promised block after block of urban opulence for Washington professionals have delivered only craters in the ground and temporary parking on weedy lots.

That's left the 2,100 newcomers in freshly painted townhouses and high-concept buildings, with such names as Velocity and Axiom at Capitol Yards, to fend for themselves in what looks like an abandoned construction zone.

Most of the everyday comforts they were promised have failed to materialize as builders fell victim to the tight credit market that resulted from last year's financial collapse. "Everything's brand-stinking new, and it's on pause," said Whitsitt, 31, an artist and cybersecurity worker at the Pentagon whose two-bedroom unit is all granite counters and exposed ceiling ducts. "We're in a wait state for a while." His wife, Paivi, orders groceries from Amazon.com rather than walk to the Harris Teeter a mile away or the Safeway across South Capitol Street watched over by security guards.

To outsiders, it seems crazy to pick up and move to a place where the only sit-down restaurants are Five Guys and Subway, the nearest grocery aisle is the refrigerated case at the CVS and happy-hour crowds shoehorn into the lobby bar of a Courtyard by Marriott.

"All my friends are like, 'What are you doing living down there?' " Amanda Young, 28, a strategy and operations consultant for the Air Force, said as she picked up dry cleaning on New Jersey Avenue a few days after she moved into the Onyx from a shared house in Glover Park.

Yet for everything the Capitol Riverfront is not, it is this: jagged and textured, where so much of Washington is buttoned-down. A relative bargain in a city of pricey real estate. A convivial community happily captured inside its utopia, while more established neighborhoods can be anonymous, stuffy even.

"In Glover Park, people act super-cool," Young said. "They don't talk to you." The week she moved into the Onyx, she recognized a woman in the elevator. "She was like, 'Wasn't I out with you with a group a people this winter?' "

Before a neighborhood arrives, there are always some people willing to gamble on a vision of what will be. Here, no one knows when that will happen.

Developers marketing the neighborhood have dubbed it "The Front," to evoke a vibe of edgy and fresh. "Something at my front door," said Liz Wainger, who does public relations for the developer-funded Business Improvement District.

But right now, there's not much at anyone's front door except "For Lease" signs where a restaurant or coffee shop would go if conditions were right. A grimy "Market Deli carry-out" sign looks promising, but no carryout has been prepared there for some time, and the store has been shuttered since thousands of families were moved out of the Arthur Capper/Carrollsburg public housing complex. Domino's opened on M Street last month, featuring low-carb, thin-crust pizza for a white-collar crowd -- plus chef salads. "The closest you can get to a salad at Five Guys is a pickle," manager Joe Burr joked.

Some popular Capitol Hill eateries have sniffed around, said Michael Stevens, the business district's executive director, seeing the potential in 35,000 daytime workers at the Navy Yard, the new federal Department of Transportation headquarters and other offices.

"But the restaurants are worried about what happens at night," Stevens said. "Everybody's just kind of reeled in until there are enough people living here."

Developers take the long view. Neighborhoods are not molded when the first concrete is poured, especially these $8 billion sprawling waterfront redevelopments planned to have 34 million square feet and 9,100 residents.

"Even if the economy hadn't fallen apart, the neighborhood wouldn't look that different than it does today," said Doug Olson, executive vice president for Monument Realty, whose mixed-use project anchoring the neighborhood is now a 35-foot-deep crater. "This is a 10- to 15-year neighborhood."

So for now, the residents hope for what could be as they dream of a river esplanade where they can walk and a water taxi with regular service beyond the baseball-game trips now offered. A Harris Teeter is on the way -- but not for at least three years, local officials say. Yes, there's a Starbucks, but on weekends it closes at 3 p.m.

Empty luxury towers in a bad market have silver linings, such as free parking and health clubs and three months' free rent offered by builders desperate to fill their condominium units with renters, which means that Young is paying $1,650 a month for a one-bedroom apartment originally marketed for $2,200.

Services are brought in and sent out: Cornercopia, a bodega-turned-gourmet deli, has sushi delivered by courier every day from Sticky Rice on H Street. The Onyx lays out bagels and cereal in the lobby on weekday mornings and offers to send out dry cleaning to Hyattsville.

There's a Metro stop, no shortage of street parking and highways to jobs in every direction. At least five congressmen have moved in, plus Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and hundreds of Hill staffers.

"I'm getting a brand-new clean unit with a gym, computer lab and a rooftop pool," said Rep. Aaron Schock, a GOP freshman representing central Illinois who is renting a co-op in the Capitol Yards, lured by the newness he wouldn't have found on Capitol Hill. "There are definitely brownfields out my window," Schock said. "But there's opportunity." He can't remember a meal he's eaten at home since he moved in last January besides his breakfasts of cereal, milk and orange juice, which he buys at CVS.

Businesses have gotten creative. In July, the Artomatic art festival took over Monument's empty nine-floor office building, and DOT turned a back lot behind its headquarters into an outdoor movie theater. The Circulator bus that whisks tourists from museum to monument every 10 minutes stops right at First Street, so Whitsitt and his wife jump on for free rides to Eighth Street, the Hill's new restaurant row.

There are a few baseball fanatics, but baseball isn't what drew most of the new residents. Still, if the Nats could open a white-tablecloth restaurant not just reserved for club-level ticket holders on game days . . .

That's not likely anytime soon, because dining service would interfere with games, said Gregory M. McCarthy, the team's vice president for government and municipal affairs. But he said the best way the Nats can generate a buzz among potential residents is by expanding the stadium's offerings in the off-season.

So the people in The Front create their own entertainment, on rooftop playgrounds where the grill with piped-in propane serves as the local restaurant and introductions are made around the pool. There are socials and pizza parties, happy hours, Sunday brunches.

It was kebabs and ribs after work on a Friday in August, as Stacey Steele and her new friends grilled and sipped Heinekens on the Onyx roof. The 37-year-old Navy analyst joined forces with an event planner, a Senate staffer, two transplants from Richmond and Tennessee who lost their jobs during downsizings, a few friends from the leasing office. Five other groups filled the tables around them. "The roof's an extension of our living room," said Sheronda Alexander, a new Air Force analyst who is still trying to sell her house in Memphis.

Planes circled on the horizon. "That's our free entertainment!" someone joked. It might not be much on the ground, but on the roof there are plenty of pleasures: fireworks on the Fourth of July, many of the city's tourist destinations in their sightlines -- and Billy Joel and Elton John together in concert on a recent Saturday night, the music as good in their living rooms as the two sang to a stadium crowd. For one night, the construction crane was forgotten.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2009, 6:16 PM
krudmonk's Avatar
krudmonk krudmonk is offline
Of Heart's Delight
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sannozay
Posts: 1,597
Eh, the child in me thinks that's what they get for funding a cricket team from Montreal instead of hometown champions DCU. The realist knows a baseball team, with 81 regular home dates should be a bigger draw. Bad teams and dull stadia (reportedly) will work against that, though.
__________________
real cities are full of fake people
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2009, 6:53 PM
novawolverine novawolverine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,847
There's definitely overbuilding in that area, which is what a lot of cities are facing. That's going to take some time to fix, but in the meantime, the area will need to try and attract some basic services to make the neighborhood more appealing to live. It's definitely a long-term thing, it may take longer, but it'll be fine in the long run IMO. I definitely agree on the issue of public funds for the stadium.

It's good to know that construction in that area hasn't completely stopped and that there are still plenty of people working in that area, so it's not a complete boondoggle of a situation.

It's also possible that when the DC United build a stadium that it'll be in nearby Buzzard's Point which isn't too far away.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2009, 8:03 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 42nd Ward
Posts: 6,374
Somewhat surprising that none of the developers were big enough fish to build these basic amenities like a grocery store and some retail spots, even if those retail spots are initially filled by national chains rather than the much coveted 'boutique retail concepts'.

I compare to the K-Station development in a recently desolate no-mans-land of truck staging yards wedged amongst viaducts (eventually about 2,000 units total spread over 5 highrises... 2 compeleted, two under construction, and one still on the boards) that, importantly, included a grocery/pharmacy across the street and a small pocket park with a green lawn, dog area, and kids playlot. With these amenities completed concurrently with the rental units, the most recent 39-story tower was largely leased within a couple months, even in the awful 2009 economy and with downtown residential supply thought of as 'overbuilt.' Basically everyone I've talked to who've moved in cite these amenities in immediate proximity as a major reason for their choice, even with (a) so much new residential space (both in rental buildings, and condos for rent by accidental landlords) available throughout downtown and (b) the immediate area being more or less unknown from a highrise rental standpoint until the last year or so.

The basic amenities are so important that it's amazing that so many developers built in no-mans-land without a plan to deal with it to make their product more attractive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2009, 8:55 PM
novawolverine novawolverine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,847
There actually is a large chain grocery store announced to lease the bottom floor of a building that is breaking ground next year if I recall. But I agree, it's basic stuff like that that is necessary for the neighborhood to thrive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 7,183
Maybe because sports stadia do not revitalize neighborhoods.

And the Nats' attendance stinks. They should have stayed in Montreal.

Then the MLB would have one sick franchise in the Expos, not two in the Nats and Orioles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Sep 15, 2009, 11:19 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,352
Novawolverine-- correct, there are plans to build a Harris Teeter as part of the Yards development. Here is more information about the project: http://dcmetrocentric.com/2009/09/09...comming-to-se/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2009, 12:46 AM
novawolverine novawolverine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,847
Aren't the Nats like 16th or so in attendance? Maybe it's value. If they play better and get some stars than their attendance will be better. There has been some effect on the Orioles attendance but Peter Angelos is a bad owner and their front office management hasn't been very good. I definitely think the region can handle two baseball teams. The Orioles still have a good following of loyal fans and the DC area has a lot of people who will support the Nats when they improve.

Also, it's not just the stadium although it's a large component. The Department of Transportation moved it's HQ to a nearby location, there's a lot of brownfield development potential there, it's near the highways and is near the water, which is another large component of this area's development. There are a load of projects happening in that area despite the economy killing a few. Like the article said, it's a longer term project but there still needs to be more basic services to create more of a neighborhood in the short term.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2009, 2:11 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by novawolverine View Post
Aren't the Nats like 16th or so in attendance? .
The Nats are 25th out of 30 teams, just barely ahead of Kansas City.

And they play in a brand new ballpark, in the fourth largest and second wealthiest metro area in the country. And they're a new franchise, so there's still some lure from curious fans.

Their attendance would be closer to dead last if it wasn't for the proximity to NYC and Philly. Whenever their teams are in town, the visiting fans sell out the park.

And Baltimore's attendance is barely ahead of the Nats. And this for a franchise that used to be among the top three every year.

At this point, it would appear that the region cannot support two teams. Baltimore used to be one of the wealthiest franchises. It's now one of the least profitable, and officially a "small market' franchise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2009, 2:29 AM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,352
Crawford:

Quote:
Their attendance would be closer to dead last if it wasn't for the proximity to NYC and Philly. Whenever their teams are in town, the visiting fans sell out the park.

And Baltimore's attendance is barely ahead of the Nats. And this for a franchise that used to be among the top three every year.
I saw the Nats play the Red Sox earlier this summer and there must have been 8 Boston fans for every Nats fan. Camden Yards is still enjoyable to go to because it is such a great deal compared to the Nationals or Yankees. We went to a game in July and paid $15 each for tickets right next to the field out in left field. Good beers were also $5 each, a deal compared to the Nationals stadium. Going to the O's game, followed by a trip to the Inner Harbor makes for an enjoyable day.

The area around the Nationals stadium will eventually develop but it will take time. The change from the previously forlorn neighborhood is already noticeable but now it is awfully quiet when there isn't a game-- vacant lots and tumble weed.

As Novawolverine noted, the US DOT headquarters is two blocks from the stadium and directly across the street from the Navy Yard metro station. This neighborhood is also very close to Barracks Row and Eastern Market, two great sections of DC.

As stated in the article, there are some great deals for those who are willing to take some risk in a neighborhood that will still take years to fully develop. A friend of mine is getting a 3-bedroom rowhouse with a garage at a price that you would normally have to live 20 miles from DC to afford.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2009, 4:11 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 42nd Ward
Posts: 6,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
Maybe because sports stadia do not revitalize neighborhoods.
Bingo. It's amazing that the myth that a sports stadium (often taxpayer funded) can achieve such miracle turnarounds has survived so long.

How many times has it actually happened? People attributed everything short of a cancer cure to Camden Yards, but it seems plausible gentrification would have occurred anyway by the harbor. Anywhere else?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2009, 4:46 PM
novawolverine novawolverine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
The Nats are 25th out of 30 teams, just barely ahead of Kansas City.

And they play in a brand new ballpark, in the fourth largest and second wealthiest metro area in the country. And they're a new franchise, so there's still some lure from curious fans.

Their attendance would be closer to dead last if it wasn't for the proximity to NYC and Philly. Whenever their teams are in town, the visiting fans sell out the park.

And Baltimore's attendance is barely ahead of the Nats. And this for a franchise that used to be among the top three every year.

At this point, it would appear that the region cannot support two teams. Baltimore used to be one of the wealthiest franchises. It's now one of the least profitable, and officially a "small market' franchise.
So what makes the Washington Capitals get by alright? It's no more of a hockey region than it is a baseball region. And hockey as a sport isn't more popular than baseball is nationally and in the media. I don't think it's possible to come to a real conclusion until these two organizations get their act together and give the fans a good team. It doesn't help that the salary system in the MLB doesn't lead to much parity. Baltimore definitely isn't the same kind of market that DC is, but they can be a lot more successful.

Visiting/transplant fans are fine. It's just a fact of life in this area and there will be a lot of them whether the team is good or bad, so that doesn't really work against the team.

I agree with the arguments that publicly funded stadiums are a bad idea and that stadiums aren't the best way to revitalize a neighborhood. Like Viva said, it's very likely that this area, like Camden Yards, would have gentrified anyway given its location and abundance of land. I wouldn't be surprised if the development around the area, not due to the team, ends up helping the team more than the economic activity spurred w/ the relocation of the team.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2009, 6:01 PM
blockski blockski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC
Posts: 269
Attendance has dropped off for the Nats (since they first moved to DC) and for the Os because both teams are horrendous.

The Nats are really bad.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcs...ss=dcsportsbog

Quote:
As the Nats have settled into the Jim Riggleman era, their total loss pace has also settled in, in a zone much less horrific than we originally expected. For weeks, they've been on pace for somewhere around 103, 104, 105 or 106 losses, none of which are historically ghastly. No big difference between those numbers, you're thinking? Well, not so fast.

See, the Nats finished with 102 losses a year ago. They'll almost certainly reach 100 losses again this year, making them one of five teams to record back-to-back 100-loss seasons in the past quarter-century. Here are those seasons:

* Kansas City Royals, 05-06 and 04-05
* Detroit Tigers, 02-03
* Tampa Bay Rays, 01-02

So this would already be very bad, in the long-term view. But all back-to-back seasons of misery are not created the same.

See, in those 25 years, 13 teams have recorded at least 200 losses in back-to-back seasons. But only three teams have recorded at least 208 losses. If the Nats limp home with, say, 103 losses this year, they'll be just extremely bad. If they reach 106, they'll be historically bad. And if they truly crater and finish the year 5-17, giving them a two-year total of 211 losses, they would have put together one of the three worst stretches of baseball in my lifetime. (I'm 33.)
Considering that and the recession, the Nats attendance is just fine.

No, stadiums do not revitalize neighborhoods on their own. However, the entire premise of that Post article is just asinine. Did they expect the area to magically turn around in less than two years? Hell, they couldn't even build the baseball stadium that fast.

There should be a moratorium on writing these kinds of articles for at least several years.

Are they underperforming? Yes. Are they doing better than Montreal? In attendance - yes - and financially? Hell yes.

Don't get me wrong, there's a ton of cynicism over the team (what do you expect when they can't spell the team's name correctly on their own uniforms), but the Nats aren't the problem. DC and Baltimore combined are home to about 8 million people - more than enough to support two ballclubs.
__________________
City Block
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2009, 7:44 PM
IconRPCV's Avatar
IconRPCV IconRPCV is offline
Downtowner
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 282
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
Bingo. It's amazing that the myth that a sports stadium (often taxpayer funded) can achieve such miracle turnarounds has survived so long.

How many times has it actually happened? People attributed everything short of a cancer cure to Camden Yards, but it seems plausible gentrification would have occurred anyway by the harbor. Anywhere else?
PETCO Park has done much to revitilize the East Village of Downtown San Diego.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted: Sep 16, 2009, 7:59 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,352
I wonder how much of the low attendence can be explained by the fact that much of DC picks up and leave for the month of August?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted: Sep 18, 2009, 4:56 AM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
The Nats are 25th out of 30 teams, just barely ahead of Kansas City.

And they play in a brand new ballpark, in the fourth largest and second wealthiest metro area in the country. And they're a new franchise, so there's still some lure from curious fans.

Their attendance would be closer to dead last if it wasn't for the proximity to NYC and Philly. Whenever their teams are in town, the visiting fans sell out the park.

And Baltimore's attendance is barely ahead of the Nats. And this for a franchise that used to be among the top three every year.

At this point, it would appear that the region cannot support two teams. Baltimore used to be one of the wealthiest franchises. It's now one of the least profitable, and officially a "small market' franchise.
i didnt think rich people even cared about baseball??
__________________
Portland!! Where young people go to retire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted: Sep 21, 2009, 2:23 PM
tackledspoon's Avatar
tackledspoon tackledspoon is offline
Candy Jail
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,943
I see three things here:
1. As already discussed, a tax-payer funded stadium has failed to be the cultural magnet that was sold to the city.
2. The developers in the area around the stadium were apparently too shortsighted to provide retail and commercial space in their early projects, and now that the market is in the tank, those things are unlikely to show up anytime soon (with the possible exception of the Harris-Teeter mentioned above)
3. I know nothing about the area around the stadium, but I'm willing to bet that, if it's a waterfront in the Northeast, there's a good deal of unused warehouse space that could be converted to commercial space and used to house markets, dry cleaners, bars, galleries and any number of other amenities that the neighborhood currently lacks. While new construction requires massive amounts of start-up capital and rehabilitation can be pricey, there's also a shit lot of grant money available to enterprising people who are willing to invest in struggling areas and build in innovative ways. Neighborhoods don't have to be rebuilt by developers. It would probably be better for the long-term economic health of the neighborhood if some of the money being spent in the neighborhood went right back into it. You won't get that if you sit on your hands and wait for a developer to come slap up a Harris-Teeter, a Starbucks and a Friday's.


Edit: I should note that I am by no means proposing a universal or fail-safe solution, but one that is plausible in any formerly "marginal" neighborhood that has seen a good deal of luxury residential development in the past decade, without any accompanying commercial development.
__________________
Colin

Last edited by tackledspoon; Sep 21, 2009 at 2:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted: Sep 21, 2009, 7:24 PM
blockski blockski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by tackledspoon View Post
I see three things here:
1. As already discussed, a tax-payer funded stadium has failed to be the cultural magnet that was sold to the city.
2. The developers in the area around the stadium were apparently too shortsighted to provide retail and commercial space in their early projects, and now that the market is in the tank, those things are unlikely to show up anytime soon (with the possible exception of the Harris-Teeter mentioned above)
3. I know nothing about the area around the stadium, but I'm willing to bet that, if it's a waterfront in the Northeast, there's a good deal of unused warehouse space that could be converted to commercial space and used to house markets, dry cleaners, bars, galleries and any number of other amenities that the neighborhood currently lacks. While new construction requires massive amounts of start-up capital and rehabilitation can be pricey, there's also a shit lot of grant money available to enterprising people who are willing to invest in struggling areas and build in innovative ways. Neighborhoods don't have to be rebuilt by developers. It would probably be better for the long-term economic health of the neighborhood if some of the money being spent in the neighborhood went right back into it. You won't get that if you sit on your hands and wait for a developer to come slap up a Harris-Teeter, a Starbucks and a Friday's.


Edit: I should note that I am by no means proposing a universal or fail-safe solution, but one that is plausible in any formerly "marginal" neighborhood that has seen a good deal of luxury residential development in the past decade, without any accompanying commercial development.
The stadium has failed? The developers have failed?

The freaking stadium hasn't even been open for two full seasons. We're mired in the worst recession in recent memory.

There are plenty of legit reasons to criticize stadium funding and the associated development claims, but you're passing judgment way too soon.

It's as if you're baking a pie, and I tell you that it's not going to work before you even get back from the grocery store with the ingredients.
__________________
City Block
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted: Sep 22, 2009, 2:30 AM
tackledspoon's Avatar
tackledspoon tackledspoon is offline
Candy Jail
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,943
Maybe I should have been a bit more precise in my speech and said that "the stadium has thus far failed to become the cultural magnet that the city was promised, and given the state of the economy, the effect that stadiums have classically had on similar neighborhoods, and slow pace of development, it is improbable that it will any time soon."
As for the developers, I didn't say that they failed, only that it's pretty myopic to build thousands of residential units without also building retail space in the area. I understand the slow, grating pace of urban development, and I'm fully aware that it's risky for businesses to expand into areas like the one described in this article. However, unless this article is grossly misleading, the neighborhood now has enough residents to support at least a mid-sized supermarket. You'd think that there would be some ground-floor retail in these new projects that's been waiting for just such a tenant.
__________________
Colin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted: Sep 22, 2009, 2:01 PM
blockski blockski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by tackledspoon View Post
Maybe I should have been a bit more precise in my speech and said that "the stadium has thus far failed to become the cultural magnet that the city was promised, and given the state of the economy, the effect that stadiums have classically had on similar neighborhoods, and slow pace of development, it is improbable that it will any time soon."
As for the developers, I didn't say that they failed, only that it's pretty myopic to build thousands of residential units without also building retail space in the area. I understand the slow, grating pace of urban development, and I'm fully aware that it's risky for businesses to expand into areas like the one described in this article. However, unless this article is grossly misleading, the neighborhood now has enough residents to support at least a mid-sized supermarket. You'd think that there would be some ground-floor retail in these new projects that's been waiting for just such a tenant.
The article is grossly misleading. There is ground floor retail space. There is a ton of stuff planned for the area.

And no, as currently constituted, there aren't enough residents to support a grocery store. There will be, but people have to move in to the buildings that are already built or under construction. Many were planned as condo buildings, and people aren't buying them right now - not because of a lack of demand, but because the price points don't work out and people don't want to sell their current house to finance a move.
__________________
City Block
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:11 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.