HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3461  
Old Posted: Aug 6, 2012, 11:39 PM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,871
Apple's upcoming 3D mapping has been updated to include Phoenix. Looks pretty cool.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3462  
Old Posted: Aug 6, 2012, 11:49 PM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickw252 View Post
Anyone know if anything is happening with the Hotel Monroe? Last news I heard was back in March when a buyer was in the due diligence stage of its purchase.
Hotel Monroe sale dead, but possible deal still remains

There was actually an article on this in Friday's Business Journal...

A $7 million deal between the prospective buyer of the long-empty, 81-year-old Hotel Monroe and the downtown Phoenix building’s receivership owner has been terminated.
But the buyer — Evergreen Development Co. Inc. — could come back and buy the Phoenix building later if it can secure financing and environmental damage to the 31-story building can be fixed.
Phoenix-based Evergreen has been looking to buy the empty Hotel Monroe building at Central Avenue and Monroe Street from ML Manager LLC, the receivership entity that took over for the bankrupt Mortgages Ltd. commercial real estate firm.
ML Manager COO Mark Winkleman said the current deal with Evergreen is off but a new deal could be crafted.
“There has been a technical termination of the escrow in order for the buyer to avoid forfeiting its earnest money. We are still analyzing a couple of issues and it is uncertain as of this moment whether or not the escrow will be reinstated,” Winkleman said.
Evergreen representatives said the company needs more time to move forward with the possible sale.
“Evergreen continues to work toward the acquisition of the Hotel Monroe property,” said spokeswoman Lauren Charpio.
Evergreen and ML Manager are working through the complicated deal details. Charpio refused to say when a new deal might be brought forth or what was causing delays.
Evergreen and Westroc Hotels and Resorts CEO Scott Lyon could redevelop the weather-beaten Monroe building into a 150-room boutique hotel. The 13-story, 157,000-square-foot property sits on a prime parcel in downtown Phoenix just south of the Chase Tower.
It is one of the remaining projects caught up in the demise of Mortgages Ltd., which resulted in a spate of commercial foreclosures and bankruptcies throughout the Valley. It’s also an undeveloped eyesore in the middle of downtown Phoenix.
The building has been vacant for several years and exposed to the elements. Several potential buyers have come and gone without buying the commercial building.
Now-defunct Scottsdale developer Grace Communities bought the building in 2007 for $27 million via Mortgage Ltd. financing. Grace went under and the property reverted to Mortgages Ltd. and subsequently ML Manager.
Evergreen develops real estate projects including shopping centers, most anchored by Walgreens stores. Westroc owns the Hotel Valley Ho in Scottsdale and the Sanctuary Resort in Paradise Valley.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3463  
Old Posted: Aug 7, 2012, 12:05 AM
HooverDam's Avatar
HooverDam HooverDam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Willo, Midtown, Phoenix, Az
Posts: 4,281
http://www.phoenix.gov/news/080612usairways.html
Quote:
Mayors Meet With US Airways, Phoenix Hub Retained


Phoenix Mayor Greg Stanton and Tempe Mayor Mark Mitchell met last week with US Airways officials, who agreed that Phoenix will remain a primary western hub for the airline even after a possible merger with American Airlines.

US Airways chairman and CEO Doug Parker indicated that a merger would make the Phoenix hub stronger because the American aircraft fleet and route network would provide greater access from Phoenix to destinations nationally and worldwide, and as a result, the majority of existing local employment would remain in Arizona.

Company officials also indicated they are open to discussing with Phoenix and Tempe the opportunity for the region to be the location for new jobs that may be created, should the merger occur. The airline also agreed to continue its corporate giving program within Arizona.

“US Airways isn’t just a name in Phoenix; it is part of our city through jobs, our economy and our everyday travel,” Stanton said. “Phoenix and Tempe are currently home to US Airways, and we were glad to be reassured that US Airways remains committed to the Phoenix metro area.”

Mitchell said the 265 flights per day that US Airways flies from Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport provide critical connections to the world for business travelers and offer leisure travelers the opportunity to travel to Phoenix and support tourism, the second largest sector of the Arizona economy. Additionally, the nearly 2,000 jobs US Airways provides in Tempe and the roughly 9,000 people it employs overall in metropolitan Phoenix are critical to the regional economy.

“It is vitally important that we retain our hub status and as many of the jobs we have as possible,” Mitchell said. “We also must position the region as the preferred location for future growth opportunities. Those are the primary responsibilities we have in participating in discussions like the one last week.”
Well thats good news, even if I would never fly US Airways I'm glad it looks like jobs will be staying in the Valley.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3464  
Old Posted: Aug 7, 2012, 12:12 AM
nickw252 nickw252 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Encanto Palmcroft, Phoenix
Posts: 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by HX_Guy View Post
Hotel Monroe sale dead, but possible deal still remains

There was actually an article on this in Friday's Business Journal...
Hmm, I don't know how I missed that. Thanks for the update. I really hope the building gets restored. It would be a shame for such a great building to sit vacant much longer, and it would be a terrible loss if the building were torn down entirely.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3465  
Old Posted: Aug 7, 2012, 6:23 AM
N830MH N830MH is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by HX_Guy View Post
Apple's upcoming 3D mapping has been updated to include Phoenix. Looks pretty cool.

Wow! Very cool! Thanks!

Perhaps, if you want to download the Google Earth. Please go to www.google.com and type it down the search box and say "Google Earth".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3466  
Old Posted: Aug 7, 2012, 7:31 AM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Foster City, CA
Posts: 4,325
I seriously doubt Phoenix will actually remain as a significant hub unless there's some overarching reason for the combined US Airways/American to have hubs so close to each other. Honestly I give it two years before PHX is left holding the bag if the merger is approved. Would love to be corrected wrong on the matter...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3467  
Old Posted: Aug 7, 2012, 3:51 PM
PHXflyer PHXflyer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean View Post
I seriously doubt Phoenix will actually remain as a significant hub unless there's some overarching reason for the combined US Airways/American to have hubs so close to each other. Honestly I give it two years before PHX is left holding the bag if the merger is approved. Would love to be corrected wrong on the matter...
I agree. In the last 5 years alone take a look at how mergers fared for Milwaukee (Midwest/Frontier), Las Vegas (America West/US Airways), Memphis (Northwest/Delta), or Cincinatti (Delta). Cleveland (Continental/United) will be the next and if this merger goes through, Phoenix won't be far behind. I'm not saying PHX will decimated to such a large extent as any of those cities, but it will have less flying overall by a merged US Airways and American.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3468  
Old Posted: Aug 8, 2012, 2:09 PM
floc34's Avatar
floc34 floc34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 53
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=wK_BlCWOg24

Interesting video regarding downtown Phoenix
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3469  
Old Posted: Aug 8, 2012, 5:31 PM
ASUSunDevil ASUSunDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by floc34 View Post
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=wK_BlCWOg24

Interesting video regarding downtown Phoenix
Awesome video. So many misconceptions of AZ, and Downtown is only getting better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3470  
Old Posted: Aug 8, 2012, 5:57 PM
HooverDam's Avatar
HooverDam HooverDam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Willo, Midtown, Phoenix, Az
Posts: 4,281
Interesting video, it seems more geared at locals who have conceptions/misconceptions about Downtown PHX. Most visitors don't really have any preconceived notions about what Downtown PHX is, though most do complain that there's "nothing to do" and "where's the shopping?" and such, so we still have a long way to go.

It is funny that the character mentions how PHX has great Mexican food though in reality Downtown PHX (the CBD that is) doesn't really have any Mexican places.

The very fact that such a video needs to be made, or that someone felt it needs to be made, shows that Downtown still has a very long way to go.

EDIT: Also, it seems weird that they promoted taking a taxi to downtown and not LRT.

VVV You're probably right, I didn't think of that! Though if thats the case it certainly didn't address the lack of hotel rooms in Downtown PHX, probably because there's no way to sugarcoat the lack of rooms.

Last edited by HooverDam; Aug 8, 2012 at 7:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3471  
Old Posted: Aug 8, 2012, 7:41 PM
pbenjamin's Avatar
pbenjamin pbenjamin is offline
METRO: Encanto
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 304
Actually I thought it was at least partially geared towards convention planners, who may have a lot of the misconceptions about downtown Phoenix that the video attempts to address.
__________________
Paul
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3472  
Old Posted: Aug 8, 2012, 9:14 PM
ASUSunDevil ASUSunDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbenjamin View Post
Actually I thought it was at least partially geared towards convention planners, who may have a lot of the misconceptions about downtown Phoenix that the video attempts to address.
This is also who I assume the video was targeted towards. Downtown still needs a grocery store, a shopping mall, and some more hotel/office and residential towers. It will happen
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3473  
Old Posted: Aug 8, 2012, 10:58 PM
phxSUNSfan phxSUNSfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASUSunDevil View Post
This is also who I assume the video was targeted towards. Downtown still needs a grocery store, a shopping mall, and some more hotel/office and residential towers. It will happen
A shopping mall...no. That is a suburban construct, but a retail street or district with shops facing the street and entrances off the sidewalks...yes. Something like Mill Ave but bigger with more offerings and some department stores. A real downtown experience. That won't happen anytime soon. I am, however, warming up to the idea of a City Target in downtown Phoenix...

Chicago:
http://chicago.racked.com/uploads/Ci...pening0912.JPG

Minneapolis:
http://www.phototour.minneapolis.mn.us/pics/7472.jpg

But not like the one in Seattle...another big, blank gray wall despite the fact that it has plenty of windows:
http://blog.seattlepi.com/insidebell...3/IMG_0286.jpg

Last edited by phxSUNSfan; Aug 8, 2012 at 11:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3474  
Old Posted: Aug 9, 2012, 12:06 AM
Vicelord John Vicelord John is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Eastlake, Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 5,404
every major city's shopping district I've ever been to has at least one mall, the largest of which is the Water Tower Center in Chicago. Yup, that's definitely as suburban as it gets. /sarcasm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3475  
Old Posted: Aug 9, 2012, 12:06 AM
doppelbanger doppelbanger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by phxSUNSfan View Post
A shopping mall...no. That is a suburban construct, but a retail street or district with shops facing the street and entrances off the sidewalks...yes. Something like Mill Ave but bigger with more offerings and some department stores. A real downtown experience. That won't happen anytime soon. I am, however, warming up to the idea of a City Target in downtown Phoenix...

Chicago:
http://chicago.racked.com/uploads/Ci...pening0912.JPG

Minneapolis:
http://www.phototour.minneapolis.mn.us/pics/7472.jpg

But not like the one in Seattle...another big, blank gray wall despite the fact that it has plenty of windows:
http://blog.seattlepi.com/insidebell...3/IMG_0286.jpg
I think some type of mall would be fine in downtown phx. Even better if it was a mix outdoor/indoor mall, in my mind what Cityscape should have been. Manhattan, San Francisco, Chicago etc all have malls in their downtown city core. Phoenix ultimately needs a combination of a lot of different things in order to make the downtown and midtown areas more appealing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3476  
Old Posted: Aug 9, 2012, 12:24 AM
phxSUNSfan phxSUNSfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by doppelbanger View Post
I think some type of mall would be fine in downtown phx. Even better if it was a mix outdoor/indoor mall, in my mind what Cityscape should have been. Manhattan, San Francisco, Chicago etc all have malls in their downtown city core. Phoenix ultimately needs a combination of a lot of different things in order to make the downtown and midtown areas more appealing.
We are starting to argue semantics here (along with VL John) but when I think of a mall I think of Metro Center, or Chandler Fashion and not an urban retail plaza like in Manhattan or Chicago. Generally those centers are built inside highrises or multiple buildings on multiple floors because retail space along streets are nearly nonexistent...which creates a need for building up.

Phoenix is basically a wasteland of street level retail and that will need to be addressed first. Some type of indoor/outdoor retail center with all sides having ground level retail facing the street and having sidewalk access would make sense in Phoenix LONG AFTER the city develops a "shopping boulevard" in downtown. And after enough residential density is built to support that level of retail activity.

Last edited by phxSUNSfan; Aug 9, 2012 at 12:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3477  
Old Posted: Aug 9, 2012, 12:29 AM
HooverDam's Avatar
HooverDam HooverDam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Willo, Midtown, Phoenix, Az
Posts: 4,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicelord John View Post
every major city's shopping district I've ever been to has at least one mall, the largest of which is the Water Tower Center in Chicago. Yup, that's definitely as suburban as it gets. /sarcasm
Thats also a trend thats very 30 years ago. Most malls, suburban and urban, across the country are dying in some form or fashion. Look at PV, Christown, Los Arcos, MetroCenter, Desert Sky, Park Central, etc. locally. Many have been retrofitted to become New Urbanist town centers, others have been converted into things more closely resembling Desert Ridge or Tempe Marketplace. Fashion Square (and malls like it, i.e. Copley Place in Boston), because of its long standing cache in the community, is able to buck the trend.

Arizona Center was supposed to be our 'downtown mall' and that fell flat for a variety of a reasons. Even though its brutally hot here 4 months out of the year, I think the development of more and more outdoor shopping centers over the past 15 years has shown that in this market, thats probably the smart way to go.

Plus where would you even put a traditional "mall" in downtown PHX? There's really not the contiguous land area for it unless you wanted to do 1. mass 'urban renewal' or 2. Elevated said mall above the street in various buildings, connected by street deadening skywalks. Either way, both bad ideas.

Our best hope is to hope for an interconnected series of pedestrian/shopping/nightlife type, ie URBAN type of streets.

*Roosevelt between the 7's as the artsy, bohemian, boutique district (its already getting really close to being this). Eventually this could expand from 15th Ave to 16th St, though at much lower density beyond the 7's.

*Jackson St evolving into the nightlife area, something akin to Mill Ave or 5th Ave in Scottsdale.

*Washington from 1st Ave to 2nd St being sort of the hub of the whole system, combining retail & nightlife (it already has the beginnings of this).

*Central from Jackson to Roosevelt being something akin to Boston's Newbury street, that is made up of smaller middle to higher end stores, nightlife, hotels, etc. We see the beginnings of this already with the Westin, Michaels Jewlers, Urban Outfitters, the Public Market & nightclubs on North Central.

* Van Buren between the 7's being home to the more major department type stores and chains. AZ Center is the start of that, and the Urban Form code calls for similar uses along the Van Buren corridor. So if we ever get a Downtown department store again, thats likely where it would go (with the exception of a City Target @ CityScape)

* Lower Grand from the I-10 to Van Buren as a secondary artsty, bohemian, boutique shopping street. This will likely take the longest to develop because its the furthest off the beaten path, furthest from LRT and being able to support multiple boutique type streets within the City core might be tough.

Or since a picture is worth a thousand words:


Downtown PHX currently lacks any place to stroll, shop, and simply enjoy all things urban. We have lots of pockets of good stuff, but its hard to stumble upon because you'd have to pass too many parking lots, blank walls and dirt lots. Until we have at least one fully connected street (I think Roosevelt gets there 1st), Downtown will be far from complete. Working on a complete network like I've outlined is likely a 50 year mission, depressingly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3478  
Old Posted: Aug 10, 2012, 6:30 AM
ASUSunDevil ASUSunDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by HooverDam View Post
Thats also a trend thats very 30 years ago. Most malls, suburban and urban, across the country are dying in some form or fashion. Look at PV, Christown, Los Arcos, MetroCenter, Desert Sky, Park Central, etc. locally. Many have been retrofitted to become New Urbanist town centers, others have been converted into things more closely resembling Desert Ridge or Tempe Marketplace. Fashion Square (and malls like it, i.e. Copley Place in Boston), because of its long standing cache in the community, is able to buck the trend.

Arizona Center was supposed to be our 'downtown mall' and that fell flat for a variety of a reasons. Even though its brutally hot here 4 months out of the year, I think the development of more and more outdoor shopping centers over the past 15 years has shown that in this market, thats probably the smart way to go.

Plus where would you even put a traditional "mall" in downtown PHX? There's really not the contiguous land area for it unless you wanted to do 1. mass 'urban renewal' or 2. Elevated said mall above the street in various buildings, connected by street deadening skywalks. Either way, both bad ideas.

Our best hope is to hope for an interconnected series of pedestrian/shopping/nightlife type, ie URBAN type of streets.

*Roosevelt between the 7's as the artsy, bohemian, boutique district (its already getting really close to being this). Eventually this could expand from 15th Ave to 16th St, though at much lower density beyond the 7's.

*Jackson St evolving into the nightlife area, something akin to Mill Ave or 5th Ave in Scottsdale.

*Washington from 1st Ave to 2nd St being sort of the hub of the whole system, combining retail & nightlife (it already has the beginnings of this).

*Central from Jackson to Roosevelt being something akin to Boston's Newbury street, that is made up of smaller middle to higher end stores, nightlife, hotels, etc. We see the beginnings of this already with the Westin, Michaels Jewlers, Urban Outfitters, the Public Market & nightclubs on North Central.

* Van Buren between the 7's being home to the more major department type stores and chains. AZ Center is the start of that, and the Urban Form code calls for similar uses along the Van Buren corridor. So if we ever get a Downtown department store again, thats likely where it would go (with the exception of a City Target @ CityScape)

* Lower Grand from the I-10 to Van Buren as a secondary artsty, bohemian, boutique shopping street. This will likely take the longest to develop because its the furthest off the beaten path, furthest from LRT and being able to support multiple boutique type streets within the City core might be tough.

Or since a picture is worth a thousand words:


Downtown PHX currently lacks any place to stroll, shop, and simply enjoy all things urban. We have lots of pockets of good stuff, but its hard to stumble upon because you'd have to pass too many parking lots, blank walls and dirt lots. Until we have at least one fully connected street (I think Roosevelt gets there 1st), Downtown will be far from complete. Working on a complete network like I've outlined is likely a 50 year mission, depressingly.
When I said "Shopping Mall" I wasn't insisting they move Metro Center to Downtown PHX. I'm talking about something similar to a Scottsdale Quarter type mall. A Horton Plaza, like San Diego has, would probably be overdoing it.

Yes, PHX does need to become more walkable, but once developers start building like crazy again and all the dirt lots are suddenly gone, your "50 year mission to stroll, shop and simply enjoy all things urban", will be accomplished in 20 years. I imagine that in 10 years most of the PHX naysayers will be gone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3479  
Old Posted: Aug 10, 2012, 7:18 PM
phxSUNSfan phxSUNSfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASUSunDevil View Post
When I said "Shopping Mall" I wasn't insisting they move Metro Center to Downtown PHX. I'm talking about something similar to a Scottsdale Quarter type mall. A Horton Plaza, like San Diego has, would probably be overdoing it.

Yes, PHX does need to become more walkable, but once developers start building like crazy again and all the dirt lots are suddenly gone, your "50 year mission to stroll, shop and simply enjoy all things urban", will be accomplished in 20 years. I imagine that in 10 years most of the PHX naysayers will be gone.
New Urbanism in a traditional downtown! NOOOOO...LOL! I know some of you disagree but I'm still thinking of traditional street life and shopping along a corridor or corridors first. I'm not sure 10 years is enough to transform downtown Phoenix. Can we attract an additional 30,000 residents into the footprint of downtown like has been pointed to as necessary for real retail development (recent Republic article)? Highly doubtful...

That would be an ADDITIONAL 30,000 in less than 1.5 square miles on top of the 10,000-12,000 residents here already. I'm thinking in 10 years an additional 10,000-15,000 is reasonable but not more...

Last edited by phxSUNSfan; Aug 10, 2012 at 7:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3480  
Old Posted: Aug 11, 2012, 2:28 AM
SunDevil SunDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ (I'm back!)
Posts: 291
Just gonna say, Spokane has a mall in it's downtown, Phoenix has much more people and stuff going on downtown than Spokane. I've lived in both cities. Spokane's downtown, however, is much more a focal point of the city than Phoenix's downtown and most of it has to do with the fact that it has a giant park along the river front downtown that happened to host a worlds fair. So I guess my conclusion is Phoenix could support a downtown mall (adapted to it's surroundings and not a giant enclosed arena type place) because it has more people downtown than a place like Spokane.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:21 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.