HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum

Since 1999, the SkyscraperPage Forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web. The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics. Welcome!

You are currently browsing as a guest. Register with the SkyscraperPage Forum and join this growing community of skyscraper enthusiasts. Registering has benefits such as fewer ads, the ability to post messages, private messaging and more.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 9:23 AM
bornagainbiking bornagainbiking is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Hamilton
Posts: 775
Speed limits on Trans-Canada

Should we have a new maximum of 120kph on the open sections and 100 in populated areas?
NS and NB are 110 and doesn't seem to be an issue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 10:18 AM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 3,708
Posted speed is arbitrary - the unit thing that matters is what speed we design for. That's the speed people will go at.

So yes, either we should fully own the fact that our highways are designed for 120km/h, or we should stop designing them for a speed 20% over the intended limit in the name of the perverted pseudoscience of North American road design and its claims of 'safety' which are unsubstantiated at best and empiric failures the rest of the time. /rant

Sorry to any road engineers on the forum.
__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 12:10 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 3,045
I was in NB & NS , 2 weeks ago, and 110 km/h was very alright ! ... I don't know what we're waiting for in QC & ON ...
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 8 200 000
MONTREAL ==> 4 100 000
QUEBEC CITY ==> 800 000
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 1:26 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 13,964
Alberta is 110 km/h already.
__________________
Alberta 2014 - 4.2 million | Calgary 2014 - 1.5 million | Edmonton 2014 - 1.4 million
Alberta 2024 - 5.2 million | Calgary 2024 - 2.0 million | Edmonton 2024 - 1.8 million

Fortis et liber
Strong & free
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 1:38 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is offline
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 7,546
The speed limit in NB may be 110 km/hr, but I can guarantee you the average road speed on the freeway system here is 120-124 km/hr.

And yes, that's perfectly fine here. Our highway network is new and traffic volumes are relatively low, so 120 km/hr is perfectly safe with good weather conditions.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 1:55 PM
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Sandy Hill, Ottawa / McBurney Park, Kingston
Posts: 1,391
My one issue with raising speed limits is what happens to those who like to drive slower. I don't drive much but when I do drive on the 400-series I always go at 100-105 because it's way more fuel efficient than driving at 120.

Personally I like the idea of having a speed limit of 100 in the rightmost lane and 120 in the others.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 1:55 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
perspicacity 24/7
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 49.8955° N, 97.1384° W
Posts: 4,880
MB is only 110 in the westernmost parts where the traffic counts are quite light. Once you get east of Brandon, the infrastructure is not really up to par in relation to the traffic counts... with all of the at-grade intersections and other infrastructure deficiencies I'm not sure that boosting the limit beyond 100 is really a wise idea (given that most people are going 5-20 km/h over the limit anyway).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 2:23 PM
Acajack Acajack is offline
CanadiEn errant
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Canada's Wretched Hive of Scum and Villany
Posts: 12,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
My one issue with raising speed limits is what happens to those who like to drive slower. I don't drive much but when I do drive on the 400-series I always go at 100-105 because it's way more fuel efficient than driving at 120.

Personally I like the idea of having a speed limit of 100 in the rightmost lane and 120 in the others.
Well, on German autobahns you often have three lanes, and the right-hand lane often has people pulling trailers and campers and going 90, the centre lane goes about 140-150 and the left lane has the speedsters going 180 or at lot more.

FYI people going too slow on divided highways can be dangerous. Though I don't think 100-105 is too slow, in good weather anything below 80-90 definitely is. In Quebec as some know the freeways have a posted 60 kmh minimum speed as well.

Moral of the story is if you aren't going to be driving reasonably fast you should stay off the freeways and take the secondary highways.
__________________
Ask me about Canada!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 2:53 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador
Posts: 13,496
We still have quite a few sections of the TCH that are 60 km/hr through and near communities. And we have several very long stretches that are 90 km/hr - such as the entire route through Terra Nova National Park.

The rest, though, is 100 km/hr. But people drive faster. I averaged 120-130 km/hr and I was very much near the slower end of average speed.
__________________
I vow to thee, my country - all earthly things, above; entire, and whole, and perfect - the service of my love.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 3:33 PM
wacko wacko is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 264
The speed limit of the Trans-Canada Highway in Saskatchewan is generally 110 kph. I'm one of those people who like to play it safe and drive at only about 3 kph above the posted limit. The highway is twinned throughout its entire length in Saskatchewan, so people are free to pass me by if they want. The same is also true of the Yellowhead Highway west of Saskatoon. (East of there, it becomes an undivided two-lane highway, but I've never driven that stretch.)

I'm not sure there's a rationale for increasing speed limits on the major highways. Higher speed limits require a longer stopping distance, aren't very fuel-efficient, and only cut off a few minutes per hour of driving. Actually, I've sometimes wondered why governments don't simply mandate car manufacturers to limit the top speed of their vehicles. I mean who other than law enforcement would need to go at 180 kph or whatever? I'm sure physically limiting cars to 130 kph would be just fine.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 3:47 PM
Boris2k7's Avatar
Boris2k7 Boris2k7 is offline
Majestic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,947
Driving the QE2...

Limit 110
Pulling 120
Getting passed by people doing 140

__________________
"The only thing that gets me through our winters is the knowledge that they're the only thing keeping us free of giant ass spiders." -MonkeyRonin

Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 4:08 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
ruff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in my room
Posts: 8,301
^Yep.

I always remember the stretch between Ottawa and Montreal being stupid fast as well. Anything less than 120 and you felt like a road hazard because the semi-trailers were mostly doing 130.

I don't think we really need to raise the speed anymore. A standard 110 across Canada would be nice and a little more enforcement of lower speeds. maybe raising the minimum speed to 70 would be a good idea. The rate at which you catch a car doing 60 is unbelievable when you're doing 120.
__________________

-- No, the last thing we need is some paternalist weighing whether we are sufficiently noncontroversial to be admitted to subsidized quarters in a Utopian dream city. -- Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 7:49 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The heart of central SWO.
Posts: 3,607
[QUOTE=1overcosc;6695433]My one issue with raising speed limits is what happens to those who like to drive slower. I don't drive much but when I do drive on the 400-series I always go at 100-105 because it's way more fuel efficient than driving at 120.

Personally I like the idea of having a speed limit of 100 in the rightmost lane and 120 in the others.[/QUOTE]

I'd be happy to try anything that would get the slowest traffic out of the middle lane(s)!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 8:01 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,251
[QUOTE=kwoldtimer;6695955]
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
My one issue with raising speed limits is what happens to those who like to drive slower. I don't drive much but when I do drive on the 400-series I always go at 100-105 because it's way more fuel efficient than driving at 120.

Personally I like the idea of having a speed limit of 100 in the rightmost lane and 120 in the others.[/QUOTE]

I'd be happy to try anything that would get the slowest traffic out of the middle lane(s)!
I like that idea too.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Development Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 8:05 PM
bornagainbiking bornagainbiking is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Hamilton
Posts: 775
I've driven the Autobahn and they are very strict on slower traffic keep right.
The left lane can be wide open and poof a streak of colour passes you.
I too did the GTA to Hfx run.
NB was a dream.
I truly believe before anything you need a intense educational TV blitz to educate the masses to proper rules and practices.
On the 407 it was empty and the only guy out there in the left lane (5 lanes). doing about 110. Forcing people to pass on the inside lanes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 8:07 PM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Dense City
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Castlegar BC
Posts: 2,820
BC is the first and only province to have 120km/h speed limits. However not sure how much of our TCH is now rated at 120. They're mostly on the Coquihalla and Island Highway.
__________________
British Columbia is named after the Columbia River, a 4 minute walk from my house
Exactly halfway between Vancouver and Calgary
castlegar.ca
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 8:43 PM
Marty_Mcfly's Avatar
Marty_Mcfly Marty_Mcfly is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 1,822
Still only 100 km/h for most parts in NL, which is okay considering large portions of the highway are only 2 lanes total. The portion near Corner Brook, and from Whitbourne on to St. John's where the highway is divided could be bumped higher; I usually drive 120 on that stretch and it's safe on a good day.
__________________
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof."
-Christopher Hitchens
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 9:24 PM
VIce VIce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Alberta is 110 km/h already.
Except for that terrible, terrible stretch through Calgary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 9:36 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 3,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by VIce View Post
Except for that terrible, terrible stretch through Calgary.
Actually it is 100 now (Ring Road). And to be truly accurate the same applies to the TCH through Edmonton. Lower speed limit on the 'old' original road but 100 on the Ring Road bypass.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 10:03 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
The internet is a K-hole
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,366
There's been some talk lately of increasing the limits on Ontario's 400-series highways as well (though, it seems there's been "some talk" of it forever). All's I know is the existing posted speed limits are completely meaningless. As it stands, the 100 km/h "limit" is the defacto minimum, while 120 is the norm for most and up to 140 in the left lane is acceptable (traffic permitting). I don't see why we even bother with these speed limits when they don't actually reflect the reality of what the roads were designed for, how people drive, and how the rules are enforced.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
   
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:28 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.