HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Mar 6, 2008, 4:22 AM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 9,296
H2o | 169 M | 45 F | Proposed

There is finally some detail coming out about this project, located at the corner of 4th Street and 11th Avenue SW (currently a parking lot with an adjacent building that will be incorporated)

It was proposed last year and a few Calgary forumers got a bit of a peak at but until recently theres been no renderings released. Plus some information from one of the forumers who works for the city with an unofficial height: 269M to the top of the spiral.

Still no name for the project however. The developers had indicated in the past that they'd wanted to be in the ground for this project by spring 2009.The project will incorporate an already existing building, the Duff Building, which is located on the east of the site. The tower will have both above and below grade parking, then number of floors of office space. Above the office space will be residential with a spiral feature on the roof which will serve to hide some of the related mechanical systems. In total there will be 45 floors (33 residential and 12 commercial I believe was the breakdown).

Renderings courtesy Bokimon






__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Mar 7, 2008, 10:22 AM
StatenIslander237's Avatar
StatenIslander237 StatenIslander237 is online now
Welcome to the Island
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 1,542
Not a bad design....decent height......LOVE the way it's placed away from the other tall buildings, it extends the skyline......folks, I think we may have a winner!
__________________
"Also, to be frank, I like dense cities best and care about them most." from The Death And Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs.
~Visit Staten Island~
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Mar 7, 2008, 2:20 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
ruff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in my room
Posts: 7,922
269m? It would be the tallest in Calgary by quite a bit (albeit some is the pointy top), but The Bow is only 236m. Bankers Hall pictured in the last picture is 197m. In that picture it's not looking close to 269m, although the perspective is quite deceiving. The overall style isn't doing much for me, but the location is definitely interesting.
__________________
get to know your SkyscraperPage photographers ... skyscraperpage on flickr ... Enter photo contest #117 - fresh (Jan 13th)

-- No, the last thing we need is some paternalist weighing whether we are sufficiently noncontroversial to be admitted to subsidized quarters in a Utopian dream city. -- Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Mar 7, 2008, 3:28 PM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 1,540
A bit of number crunching shows the average height per floor to be around 5.3 metres (assuming the spire is around 30 metres). Give me a break... no residential is going have floor to floor heights of 17+ feet...
__________________
My Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=52344624
A proud member of the former Airborne Regiment, 87-88
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Mar 7, 2008, 5:08 PM
CtrlAltDel CtrlAltDel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 697
It's 169m not 269m. One of the Calgary forumers misread the DP.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Mar 7, 2008, 6:20 PM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 1,540
Thanks... that sounds WAY more realistic.
__________________
My Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=52344624
A proud member of the former Airborne Regiment, 87-88
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Mar 7, 2008, 7:19 PM
Spocket's Avatar
Spocket Spocket is offline
Keep yo pimp hand strong
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Changchun , China
Posts: 1,994
Yeah, I found that to be an incredible figure too. Thanks for the correction on the height.

I rather like the design (personal taste , to each their own I suppose) but I have to admit that the location is what makes it that much more appealing. What are the odds that this thing will actually get built though ?
__________________
Giving you a reason to drink and drive since 1975.

I am the English teacher about whom your mother warned you .

They call me Captain Goodgitch . Nobody knows why .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Mar 7, 2008, 7:58 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vs;hstu
Posts: 12,586
Even 169m is quite tall for the area it's going into. I'd rather see it around 130m myself, but I can live with 169m
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Mar 8, 2008, 6:10 AM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 9,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spocket View Post
Yeah, I found that to be an incredible figure too. Thanks for the correction on the height.

I rather like the design (personal taste , to each their own I suppose) but I have to admit that the location is what makes it that much more appealing. What are the odds that this thing will actually get built though ?
Hard to say. Procura is currently building another building that has seemingly been under construction for an eon now (the Montana). They do seem to take their time, and the lot for this one is pretty prime, by the time its completed there will be 3 other brand new towers within a block of it (an office building across the intersection thats nearing completion, an office condo to the east, and another residential on the block to the north.
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Mar 8, 2008, 6:38 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
ruff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in my room
Posts: 7,922
Hey mersar do you have the names/heights of the other towers in that area that are proposed? I'm curious how this area is going to build out.
__________________
get to know your SkyscraperPage photographers ... skyscraperpage on flickr ... Enter photo contest #117 - fresh (Jan 13th)

-- No, the last thing we need is some paternalist weighing whether we are sufficiently noncontroversial to be admitted to subsidized quarters in a Utopian dream city. -- Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Mar 8, 2008, 6:42 PM
pablosan pablosan is offline
Up Up and Away
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,379
That is a pretty interesting looking building.
__________________
DenZone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Mar 8, 2008, 6:47 PM
Boris2k7's Avatar
Boris2k7 Boris2k7 is offline
Majestic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,191
There is another tower just across the street that is proposed, but only around about as tall as the brown building to the centre left of the second rendering (~65m). There are a pair of condo towers, 84m and 92m, under construction a block to the north. And then just north of those towers is the proposed Alberta Boot project which should clock in at about 125m and 180m. And across the CPR tracks to the north of that is the Eighth Avenue Place office project at 166m and 211m. Other than the Alberta boot project, there are no buildings of comparable height in the immediate area.
__________________
"That's the most passive-aggressive, hall monitor bullshit I've heard yet." -freeweed

Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: Mar 8, 2008, 7:04 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
ruff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in my room
Posts: 7,922
Thanks Boris2k7. Alberta Boot <<shudder>>. I'll have to look that one up.
__________________
get to know your SkyscraperPage photographers ... skyscraperpage on flickr ... Enter photo contest #117 - fresh (Jan 13th)

-- No, the last thing we need is some paternalist weighing whether we are sufficiently noncontroversial to be admitted to subsidized quarters in a Utopian dream city. -- Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted: Mar 8, 2008, 7:07 PM
Boris2k7's Avatar
Boris2k7 Boris2k7 is offline
Majestic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,191
__________________
"That's the most passive-aggressive, hall monitor bullshit I've heard yet." -freeweed

Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted: Mar 8, 2008, 7:10 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 16,322
I like it. Construction should be about a year off.
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted: Mar 8, 2008, 11:36 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
ruff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in my room
Posts: 7,922
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boris2k7 View Post
Nice. Seriously better than what I was imagining. Then again, no one wants to see what I was imagining.
__________________
get to know your SkyscraperPage photographers ... skyscraperpage on flickr ... Enter photo contest #117 - fresh (Jan 13th)

-- No, the last thing we need is some paternalist weighing whether we are sufficiently noncontroversial to be admitted to subsidized quarters in a Utopian dream city. -- Jane Jacobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted: Mar 9, 2008, 6:14 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 34,932
decent attempt, but failed at incorporation of the elements. I also am of strong belief it is trying to use all of the current "contemporary parts" that are popular right now in design.

7/10
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted: Mar 25, 2008, 6:06 AM
coolguyj's Avatar
coolguyj coolguyj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 73
i dont like that second rendering but the first and third are awesome
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted: Mar 25, 2008, 6:29 AM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
oops.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,617
ew
__________________
There's a very subtle perfection in everything I do.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted: Apr 25, 2008, 7:49 PM
Thinner6's Avatar
Thinner6 Thinner6 is offline
Hypnotized
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 551
New rendering:

Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:35 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.